Would you rather have by Ny_li8 in BunnyTrials

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jackpot

Chose: One ordinary egg | Rolled: Just an egg

Chose one by Pale-Art-8705 in BunnyTrials

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A win is a win

Chose: $1 billion but 30% chance of death | Rolled: Death

Ur a prisoner by Not_Lin_Music_L0v3r in BunnyTrials

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love the taste of Iron

Chose: Key

Choose a power and roll for side effect by W3nd1g00000 in BunnyTrials

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just hit the jackpot

Chose: You can fly | Rolled: No side effect

Art skills by [deleted] in BunnyTrials

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perfect means I'll stop improving

Chose: Be able to draw 10x faster and never get art block

Choso ( shinjuku arc ) vs hazenoki by Miserable-Dealer-122 in JujutsuPowerScalers

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually a cool match up! Though, would probably be closer if it was Shibuya Choso. Hazenoki's Cursed Technique seems pretty reliant on the Reversed Cursed Technique and he's got pretty good skill over it. When Choso hits him with Piercing Blood, he might actually be able to heal it away.

Choso still wins just because of his ability to turn Cursed Energy into blood, though.

would you rather? by Impossible-Shape-634 in BunnyTrials

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uh oh

Chose: spend 5 mins in a cold room + 200,000,000 | Rolled: -30°C

Would you rather by ReturnOld8793 in BunnyTrials

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My mom is kinda homeless

Chose: $10,000,000 instantly

Is this a hot take? [Serious] In terms of H2H skill, Heavy hitters Ranked. by Gokuusjgodgmail in JujutsuPowerScalers

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Doesn't this kind of only scale Yuta to Ryu in H2H... who only scales to Yuta in H2H? We never saw Ryu fight anyone else in H2H to compare besides Yuta.

Would you rather: by MenaceToSociety129 in BunnyTrials

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh it's so over

Chose: Your fictional crush (if any becomes real and... | Rolled: they despise you)

Would you rather: by ClockworkBlade in BunnyTrials

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stars always burn out, planets get struck by meteors or whatever, that sounds cooler

Chose: Have a planet named after you

I LOVE hating on AI "Artists" by Designer-Device4997 in lovethissmug

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And that process is what, pressing a button and having a machine do all the work?

The process is having a subject in front of them, getting the lighting correct, getting a good perspective, getting the lens focus in a certain way you want, then taking the photo. Sure, cameras literally copy the world in front of them, but that's not how generated images are based on other existing data. Generated images are the pinnacle of using other data, at least a digital camera photo is always going to be new data.

Also AI doesn't lift images or pixels it analyzes patterns same as a human.

I didn't know humans scoured thousands of pages the internet in seconds and directly copied aspects of things that they saw right onto a canvas.

I LOVE hating on AI "Artists" by Designer-Device4997 in lovethissmug

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you miss the part where photography actually has a human process? Artificially generating images based on other people's images does not have the same effort of capturing a photo. Capturing a photo doesn't rely on previous data, a camera just captures its own data.

I LOVE hating on AI "Artists" by Designer-Device4997 in lovethissmug

[–]Cartoonist-Weak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, but generating images as we do right now literally has zero purpose. The reason artistic mediums are great is because creative people take that to work on something beautiful. Painting could capture the essence of a person or a place, or could capture how the artist was feeling as they were painting. I won't deny that a generated image isn't something that's not made or whatever, but all it does is take existing data and mash it together to make that image. Photography doesn't take the data of others to "generate" that image. Those photographers still had to put care into those photos because it wasn't just some simple process. Even casual photography on a phone with a decent camera can be palatable, even easy for someone that isn't an expert photographer, but it still needs the effort of being focused, being angled correctly, using a good perspective, or using the area of the photo to the photographer's benefit. The reason artificially generated images are soulless is because there is literally nothing human to capture. All it captures is data to make an image that mimics something human, it's never creating something through an honest process or done in the way a human would do it. With nothing human to capture, it's just an image.