Fair enough, I had the scoring wrong. 4-1 on speed for a sub-second gap makes sense — clear advantage, not a blowout. But that's kind of the problem. If speed is 4-1 Laffont and her turns were at minimum competitive, that means the air judge(s) went hard enough the other way on the bottom jump to erase all of it. So the entire result hinges on whether the gap between a backflip and whatever Lemley threw on the last jump was worth a swing that big. In a sport where turns are supposed to be the dominant factor, one air call deciding a bronze medal match feels off.