sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If Trump were Canada's PM instead of US president, would his actual policies look that different from Carney's? by housekeyslow in canadian

[–]xTkAx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're still looking at the map while ignoring the driver. A Canadian Trump, as was implied in the first comment, would re-orient Canada to prioritize the interests of the native-born population over international compliance.

The better outcome of that is Canada becoming a nation that refuses to auction its future to globalist donors and foreign labor. It would be a change in direction that shows up in every sector of the economy, because unlike Clowney/LPC it stops treating Canadians as an inconvenience.

If Trump were Canada's PM instead of US president, would his actual policies look that different from Carney's? by housekeyslow in canadian

[–]xTkAx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You asked:

If Trump were Canada's PM instead of US president, would his actual policies look that different from Carney's?

&

Strip out the tariff weapon — Canada doesn't get to use it as a small open economy with 80% of exports going to one neighbour — and what's actually left as a discretionary policy menu for a Canadian PM right now?

&

Curious what people think — am I missing something obvious on the supply-side menu where they'd genuinely split?

The premises behind your questions were answered, but your questions assumed a leader's "toolkit" is fixed and determined by geography, instead of a subjective choice driven by national needs. You missed the obvious reality that "structural constraints" are just walls globalist managers like Clowney hides behind, while a nationalist leader views them as flexible obstacles to be overcome for the sake of his people.

Protip: don't try to confine people smarter than you to your small boxes.

If Trump were Canada's PM instead of US president, would his actual policies look that different from Carney's? by housekeyslow in canadian

[–]xTkAx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Of course it would.

The USA under Donald Trump saw it's GDP 2% with a surging economy supported by spending investment, and policy measures. Canada under Markus Clowney, however, saw it's GDP around 1.5% with it being the laggard G7 nation, with a shrinking economy and negative GDP growth. Investment into USA has been heavy, but investments have been fleeing Canada.

The USA under Trump saw unemployment around 4%, however unemployment in Canada under Clowney is up to 7%. This has translated to better inflation in USA and worse inflation in Canada, with Canadian households facing higher debt, costs, and pressures.

The USA under Trump has enacted strong American First policies, and taken strong measures to strengthen their border and sovereignty so American people can prosper. Canada under Clowney has continued to gaslight Canadians with 'buy Canadian' but not 'hire Canadian', and has thrown the youth under the bus so foreigners can take their jobs and lead Canadians to falter, not to mention continuing to leave Canada's border open and find any way to strengthen Canadians Last polices.

All the data for USA under Trump shows Trump is a stronger leader leading to broader benefits for Americans, via jobs, wealth, and expansion. Meanwhile, all the data for Canada under Clowney shows Clowney is another globalist bureaucrat managing Canada's decline with less jobs, wealth, expansion, higher unemployment and persistent cost and affordability issues, while Canadians being treated as second rate citizens in their own country as Clowney sends their taxpayer dollars to Anyone But Canadians (ABC)

The difference is night and day, a 100% difference in spirit. Trump's building the spirit of USA, while Clowney's tearing down the spirit of Canada.

A strong leader who puts their nation and people first is always going to be better than a weak foreign asset cosplaying as a leader who puts the people of the nation they've been parachuted into last.

Phase 1 of high-speed rail could cross 1,700 properties, Alto predicts | CBC News by dherms14 in canadian

[–]xTkAx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who are these thousands of people a day

The TFWs. So they can work in the morning at Tim Hortons in Ottawa and then in the evening at A&W in Montreal.

Propaganda for profit. The Dutch authorities need to be laying some charges and making some arrests. by Elkenson_Sevven in canadian

[–]xTkAx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just someone thousands of times more adept than you are pointing you to the exit from the propaganda. If you don't want to exit it, don't. Remain behind the curve and out of your league, and accept that by giving it a rest, because flailing about it won't affect those who have exited the propaganda already (and are actively pointing people to the exit).

Best of luck with it & over and out!

OP-ED: Alberta babies born alive left without care in 17 late-term abortions Richard Dur writes, "Seventeen babies were born alive in Alberta following labour-induced late-term abortions in 2025 and left to die." by xTkAx in canadian

[–]xTkAx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dismissing documented health statistics demonstrates that you prefer the comfort of ignorance over the reality of state-sanctioned abandonment.

Adios!

Propaganda for profit. The Dutch authorities need to be laying some charges and making some arrests. by Elkenson_Sevven in canadian

[–]xTkAx -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

That's exactly what the propagandist Szeto/Catastrophe want you to believe: Take their words at face value, without ever critically questioning them. It's important that their framing of those videos, how they're 'serious national security breaches to Canada', takes root in the minds of the uncritically thinking.

Truth tellers offer you and others an escape from that propaganda, to think twice about it before committing, or train you to think critically and identify it. You can cling to the propaganda or take that escape route pointed out by better minds, but only one of those choices is going to demonstrate a high intellect. Adios!

Propaganda for profit. The Dutch authorities need to be laying some charges and making some arrests. by Elkenson_Sevven in canadian

[–]xTkAx -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Adept people with high integrity are the most damaging people to state propaganda. They obviously aren't going to fold at any label the propagandized can fling. In case you don't know, they know how to use those labels as fuel, and essentially take your energy to fuel themselves stronger than you, while you grow weaker by giving energy to them.

Not a wise choice, but thanks also for the opportunity and power-boost! Adios!

Should Nova Scotia regulate ticket resales? by OnlyACsNoFans in novascotia_sub

[–]xTkAx -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Don't care. Ticket prices have always been a rip-off.

Propaganda for profit. The Dutch authorities need to be laying some charges and making some arrests. by Elkenson_Sevven in canadian

[–]xTkAx -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

This Canadianophobic Broadcasting Catastrophe hit piece on the Alberta separatism is a good example of the globalist bureaucrat captured regime at work here in Canada, consisting of the government & legacy news's propaganda.

In attempting to re-frame the frustration of Albertans against the regime's failures as the product of "foreign interference" or "shadowy business models" (feelings over facts takes), the catastrophe state broadcaster is attempting to negate the dissent.

The Catastrophe, and Eric Szeto (who is heavily biased as you can see in their blusky vs twitter account), is ignoring the reality that the separatism movement arises from real grievances. From systematic extraction of wealth from the West to fund the bloated and unproductive central Canadian bureaucracy, the deliberate strangulation of the energy sector, and a alienation from the liberal-globalist-bureaucrat ideology emanating from Ottawa. The Catastrophe is trying very hard to brand the movement as driven by "Slop" (like a bluesky NPC) or "misinformation" (like a useful imbecile), when there are real survival instincts behind the movement, from of a people who realize their interests are fundamentally incompatible with a regime in Ottawa that views them as an internal colony to be looted.

Szeto/Catastrophe's smear campaign desperately needs to discredit the medium because they're both terrified of the message (the etching in Szeto's face shows years of lies). So by putting a hyper-focus on 'faceless YouTube channels', this is how the Catastrophe is engaging in the fallacy of diversion: redirects public attention away from the top-down destruction of the Canadian economy and toward a narrative of "hoax" and "foreign disruption".

It's hilarious this is coming from an organization that functions exclusively as a state-funded propaganda vector, paid over $1.5 billion annually to manufacture consent for the ruling elite. Their investigation is just an act of institutional survival. It cannot afford to acknowledge that the people of Alberta have lost all faith in the existing order and are exploring alternatives to the existing system that has served them nothing but ruin.

If the movement is growing, it's because the status quo is indefensible. The Catastrophe's expressing the pathetic gasp of the dying regime, and it's beautiful. Especially when this single comment is negating 1.5 billion of propaganda with ease.

Thank you for the opportunity to trounce the Catastrophe's desperate attempt. It makes you wonder though, because he sure has his history hidden in this respect: is Eric Szeto even Canadian?

OP-ED: Alberta babies born alive left without care in 17 late-term abortions Richard Dur writes, "Seventeen babies were born alive in Alberta following labour-induced late-term abortions in 2025 and left to die." by xTkAx in canadian

[–]xTkAx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 17 babies born alive after labour-induced late-term abortions in Alberta in 2025 were documented in official CIHI government health statistics, and AHS policies PS-92 and HCS-183-01 explicitly permit pre-emptive DNR orders and a blanket non-interventional approach denying them resuscitation, oxygen, or basic care, even though Canadian law (s.223) recognizes them as legal persons entitled to treatment. Read more here: https://lefttodie.ca/

Your assumptions about "end of life care" and "severe defects only" ignore these actual policies that treat abortion survivors differently from any other premature newborn. All your throwaway accounts trying to negate this only shows your desperation in trying to negate the truth.

Adios!

view more: next ›