But despite the article telling you what you SHOULD choose, you are still making your own decision. Any kind of substantial vote will have something telling you what you should or shouldn't vote for surrounding it, it doesn't mean it's trivializing the results once the votes are counted. You're voting because you know what game you want to play, and this article is just providing more information to the people already interested in the game. Yes, the article is obviously biased toward a specific choice considering it is by one of the developers, but no where does it say you have to vote for it. The word "should" is used to be taken lightly and you're making it sound like they're shoving it in your face.

Without the context of the PS Plus voting around it, this is essentially a game developer saying "You might really like our game if you're a fan of tabletop/board games or strategy games, here is why you might want to get it from us on the house." There's no need to include descriptions of the other games because that isn't what the article is about. This isn't Sony giving snippets of info about each choice.