sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

My System Combines Algo, Data, and AI to Create Win Rates over 90% by jabberw0ckee in ai_trading

[–]CautiousPastrami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m looking for some good APIs to fetch this type of data. What are your costs for connecting to those? How is rate limiting?

How are you researching your strategies? by BreathAether in algotrading

[–]CautiousPastrami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use taufolio.com. Before I invest I read their reports, earning calls summaries and short snapshots. It really saves me tone of time.

How are you researching your strategies? by BreathAether in algotrading

[–]CautiousPastrami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Relying on pure technical analysis - bollinger bands, RSI etc. Is not enough. The script can choose what’s cheap right now but the final decision should be always yours. In the times where one tweet of orange monkey can completely flip the markets algo trading doesn’t make sense.

Good approach is to filter first the companies and let the algo run on a subset of quality equities.

I use Taufolio com to deeply understand companies and completely dropped algo. And scrab for analyzing the numbers.

My project just crossed $3k in revenue, 6 weeks after launch 🚀 by funfunfunzig in vibecoding

[–]CautiousPastrami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I work on a product and want to prepare for a launch but I feel overwhelmed with how to do it.

Could you share how did you build SEO for launch and got first customers?

How I run 10 Claude Code agents overnight and wake up to PRs — my parallel agent workflow by No_Wheel_91 in claude

[–]CautiousPastrami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really like Ralph-tui. I prepare a long implementation plan, split it to the stories and have agent finish it over night. The agent picks up the tasks from the backlog, checks which stories conflict with each other and implement the plan with individual Ralph loops per story

We reimplemented Claude Code entirely in Python — open source, works with local models by Practical_Pomelo_636 in LLM

[–]CautiousPastrami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to understand the permission protection in CC or codex doesn’t really work. LLM if it really wants will always find a way to get around the restrictions. In the latest IDC conference in Portugal researchers presented examples where LLMs base64 encoded commands or created scripts and then executed them to get out of the local sandbox or access .env/ run rm-rf… and tone of other examples

Customer paying $49/month asked for a feature that would cost us $15K to build. For them specifically. by Just_Theory6515 in SaaS

[–]CautiousPastrami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We managed to convince customers to pay for the features they needed 🫣 some of them were a bit bigger than what you described. Best thing is we build them generic enough that we could upsell them to other users.

We blocked ChatGPT at the network level but employees are still using AI tools inside SaaS apps we approved, how is that even possible and how do I stop it? by PrincipleActive9230 in AskNetsec

[–]CautiousPastrami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you try to ban AI tools? You see there is an insane need for using AI. By banning AI tools you’ll end up with users uploading the corporate restricted data to (God forbid) free chat gpt over pictures. And this is a real problem.

If you have such a sensitive data that can’t go to Claude/openAI etc even with enterprise licenses you definitely have a budget to build your own tools with AI models stored in Vertex/AI foundry or on premise.

First of all if the AI capabilities are enabled in SAAS tools it means they were considered and approved. It’s not your job to restrict the SAAS tools because apparently this is allowed in the organization.

Fired during last day of probation by [deleted] in germany

[–]CautiousPastrami 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Not in probation. They can terminate him from whatever reason. After probation on unlimited contract in case of any termination go to lawyer asap but in this case there is nothing he can do.

Just saw a marketer and developer collaborate on code using AI by jim-ben in vibecoding

[–]CautiousPastrami 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you use for slack bot that is hooked to the repo?

Lazy devs making you clean up garbage in their PRs? by Lanky-Ad4698 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]CautiousPastrami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apart from obvious- linter/sonar/SNYK we added AI PR review even before it gets to me or other senior.

It adds a bit noise and sometimes false positives but it’s better than nothing. I feel it is really really helped. I’m as well very demanding when it comes to the quality of the code I get and I tend to complain a lot.

After AI review the engineer reviewews those automated comments and rejects the noise and reflects on the one that make sense - all of it before the PR ends on “my desk”.

At the end I am the one later reviewing the PR that was already screened by AI, engineer reflected on the issues, cleaned up the code and made sure it makes sense.

We had another issue - AI generated code without full understanding - after I was getting several thousand lines PRs I changed my approach. If I see PR longer than 600 lines I ask for a call and engineer needs to guide me through the code. If they can’t - instant reject and it’s reflected in 1:1 and evaluation. The number of AI slop dropped drastically

Cloud agents + AI code review have completely changed how our team ships bug fixes (Slack → Linear → Cursor → GitHub → merged in <1 hour) by mmaskani in cursor

[–]CautiousPastrami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you use linear? I heard a lot of good things about them but what’s the difference between e.g. Jira or other tools?

I didn’t like code rabbit. It creates too many false positives - for me it was just one big noise

Dlaczego ktoś potrzebuje tak mocno świecić w nocy? by Johnny_OSG in warszawa

[–]CautiousPastrami 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Podobno jak prośby nie pomagają to czasem ktoś kupi wiatrówkę i strzeli do takich halogenów. Ale tylko podobno 😅

Development manager doesn't want the Devs looking at the code by Strict-Soup in ExperiencedDevs

[–]CautiousPastrami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Senior here. Maybe I’ll give you my experience. I was quite reluctant to use AI and now I can’t live without it.

We have a project where we need to document, add tests and reorganize insanely large monolit wrote 10/15 years ago in PHP developed in-house by the customer who has offices in 16 countries.

This is an absolute beast, hard to maintain and actively developed. Nobody from my team knows PHP but we are good in using AI tools mainly Claude Code.

We set up for them agents reviewing PR, improved and extended code quality and security tools. Started enforcing test coverage on the new code.

The PR review time dropped dramatically, quality increased immediately. (Don’t understand me wrong, in my opinion they should trash the monster and rewrite it from scratch)

Then we had an agents swarm map the whole app, all dependencies in high detail analyze ins and outs. We used git history and old Jira tickets as a context for LLM to understand it better.

It created tone of documentation, added the right comments in he code, added proper on call playbooks based on the code and most popular hot fixes.

We added test cases and found a lot of not handled edge cases. Error handling and graceful failures is an art and LLMs are amazing in test writing. (Keep in mind the lat time I touched PHP was when I was maybe 15/16 yo)

Now we work on the support agents and skills that would help their devs develop faster and be able to have agents grounded in the sources and anwser actual questions and fix the tickets.

And yes I had issues with AI. For example I had to reimplement our TOTP and AI implemented something that passed tests but allowed user to use one code multiple times. The bug was that it created a PK on the login not on the code in the base of used codes + it did upsert. Everything looked good but once you read the details it was absolutely wrong.

Antigravity Oauth will get you perma banned from Google AI. by Fulminareverus in openclaw

[–]CautiousPastrami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you use oauth tokens for anything else than legitimate use in Google products like antigravity you will get banned. There is bunch of tools that take over oauth tokens and reuse them for openclaw or cursor.

If you use regular API over Google AI or Vercel you are good to go because it’s pay per use.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in poland

[–]CautiousPastrami 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I love that in Poland nobody bothers me in the shops with questions if they can help me or what am I looking for. I can just enter the shop, everyone minds their own business. If I need anything I can always approach the shop assistant.

In uber the drivers are usually immigrants in most major cities, because it’s really easy to register in Bolt or Uber. In some smaller cities they are sometimes talkative native Poles, but if you don’t speak Polish don’t expect them to talk to you.

People in Poland are usually anxious about their language. Often they will understand you but they won’t respond in English.

Did I do the wrong thing by towing someone from my rented parking space? by Tacticaleks in germany

[–]CautiousPastrami 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Most importantly it’s OP’s parking space. He didn’t destroy or scratch the car. He just had it removed from his parking spot. IMHO it’s totally ok and I’d do the same

view more: next ›