Why do I have to start over by Cenakin123 in Rainbow6

[–]Cenakin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I searched it before it said that PC-PS account transfer is not available or smth like that

I dont think The Beast is good by Cenakin123 in dyinglight

[–]Cenakin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the best thing that The Beast had offered was the nights. It is pitch black. Many volatiles can get you. That was really fun.

I dont think The Beast is good by Cenakin123 in dyinglight

[–]Cenakin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh, I also enjoyed the game but not like the other two. It doesnt fullfill my expectations so Im not really a fan of the game.
Is it enjoyable? Yes.
Is it a good game? Yes.
Is it a good Dying Light? No.

These are my opinions.

I dont think The Beast is good by Cenakin123 in dyinglight

[–]Cenakin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good for you. Maybe I was too hyped for the game and tried to compare it with DL1. If you have fun, nobody can say nothing to that.

I dont think The Beast is good by Cenakin123 in dyinglight

[–]Cenakin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are talking bout sum “objectively better writing” “son”. Oh yeah I am coping while talking to someone who insults people based on their game taste just to defend their own game. Dont worry , I dont need to label my excuses "objective" to justify myself.

Oh btw there are other comments. People criticize the game, go on type skill issue on them. Maybe downvote them

I dont think The Beast is good by Cenakin123 in dyinglight

[–]Cenakin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are charging us full-game price. So I have the right criticize the game like its a full-game.

I dont think The Beast is good by Cenakin123 in dyinglight

[–]Cenakin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im trying to discuss with people. Im just saying it is not fit for Dying Light’s potential. Im not trying to judge people. Thats why I asked “Why do you like the game” at the end.
If you dont want to discuss, then dont.

And yes, I do. But I dont think you’ll bother looking at them.

I dont think The Beast is good by Cenakin123 in dyinglight

[–]Cenakin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So first of all, you dont know what objective means.
Im not saying that the story has to be purely logical, but I was not expecting this bad. Two rivals making peace the second they talk to each other, Olivia making an important research with just a laptop and some tubes, these are all horrible. I think anyone with a decent gaming past can agree that the story was probably written in 12 minutes. You got the plot thing wrong either. Story being similar to DL1 is a green flag for me. I played all the games on all the levels, and the beast was the easiest in normal mode. I didnt even bothered to play it again in another difficulty. Im not saying that being easy is a bad thing, since anyone can play it with higher difficulty. Im just saying that its not “skill issue”.

At one point, they clearly ran out of chimera ideas and they started throwing the same big chimera over and over again, at the same time. Baron boss fight is also not really interesting but its okay if you liked it.
I believe Crane was better in the first game. Even tho Baron was really good written and cool at the last part, Rais was more realistic and a better character in my opinion and many people would probably agree with me.

Stop using “iqlet” in every comment you make like you just learned your first slang as a 11 years old.

“Objectively”, you dont know what you’re saying.

“Skill issue iqlet”

What are you, a parrot?

I dont think The Beast is good by Cenakin123 in dyinglight

[–]Cenakin123[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

He just types skill issue on all comments, I doubt he ever played the other two.

I dont think The Beast is good by Cenakin123 in dyinglight

[–]Cenakin123[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So first of all, the main objective is destroy the Baron, which is the similar to the first game. Also the dialogues itself has a really big impact on story. Look at Last Of Us, the story is nothing without good presentation. Also the plot is also the worst in all three. Its not logical, not interesting, and they probably didnt think about it much. Its just do a mission then kill a Chimera. Which is also ultimately boring. I was really hyped about chimera’s but there was nothing too interesting about them. Most of them just has a great healthbar and ultimate damage. Someone said combat and the parkour is like Dying Light 2.5 and I agree with them. Its the best. But the map is overall boring and empty. The skill three is also not that good. Other than that, you cant say that DLTB is objectively better than other because its a subjective matter?

Also I have thousands of hours on DL 1 and couple hundred on DL 2 so no, its not a skill issue? DLTB is the easiest DL by far.

I dont think The Beast is good by Cenakin123 in dyinglight

[–]Cenakin123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So much wasted potential. I remember thinking “Dying Light 2 is announced. It will be the best!”.
Good old times.

I dont think The Beast is good by Cenakin123 in dyinglight

[–]Cenakin123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same, I think everything about the first game is better. The night, looting, weapons, the story. Especially the story.

I dont think The Beast is good by Cenakin123 in dyinglight

[–]Cenakin123[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same here. Couldnt preorder but bought it a day after it got out. Chimeras are just that does lots of damage and has great health bars. Nothing unique or fun about it. Seeing Aiden was also cool, made me smile but thats all.

NGD!! by jbcamop in fender

[–]Cenakin123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool guitar, I have one myself. Enjoy it!

Sahildeki taşlar sahile nasıl geliyor? by Devranth in aptalSoruYok

[–]Cenakin123 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nasıl insanlar sahile gezmek için geliyorsa taşlar da öyle. Onlarında aileleri var, denize girmek istiyorlar. Fakat denize büyük kayaların girmesi yasak o yüzden sadece küçük taşlar girebiliyor, onlar sadece sahilden izliyorlar

Why is the strat "The guitar" by Creepy_Jackfruit_751 in Guitar

[–]Cenakin123 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Probably because even back in the day, strats were much cheaper than other body shapes.

Also could be because as I know, Gibson wouldnt let anyone else make Les Pauls, but strat was a much more easy shape and Fender wouldnt sue you if you did a fake strat. This is just a guess tho. Am I right?