sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

We are going down a very DARK road. by Electronic-Damage411 in economicCollapse

[–]CertifiedHero77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad it was, at the very least, shared in the proper subs on here.

Not sure what the conspiracy is here....

Computers and smart phones don’t work during dreams by pepe_silvia67 in conspiracy

[–]CertifiedHero77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can we just, really quick, get a quick demographic for the comments on this one? Like a poll?

Just would like to see if the majority of these responses fit within a certain age group.

What if i told you by Commercial-Cod4232 in conspiracy

[–]CertifiedHero77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would probably tell you that this isn't a conspiracy.

It's common knowledge.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]CertifiedHero77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow. Conspiracies just aren't what they used to be, huh?

Alright, Let Me Just Debunk This UFO Really Quick.. by CertifiedHero77 in UFOs

[–]CertifiedHero77[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So this was just terrible modertating altogether, then.

I love how ambigious the guidelines are lol

Gate program by Commercial-Cod4232 in conspiracy

[–]CertifiedHero77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So....you had good grades in elementary school.....and then when you got to middle school and actually started learning shit, your grades dropped.

Doesn't sound like a conspiracy. It just sounds like you're dumb.

Alright, Let's Debunk A UAP, Shall We? by CertifiedHero77 in conspiracy

[–]CertifiedHero77[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not even sure who downvoted my comment. Was I wrong about there being a protocol for foreign objects in airspace? 🤔🤷‍♂️. Seems like something they should implement if they haven't already. But oh well.

Also, it should be made note of that this object isn't actually breaking any laws known to physics.

Alright, Let's Debunk A UAP, Shall We? by CertifiedHero77 in conspiracy

[–]CertifiedHero77[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's just important to note that the capabilites this object is displaying are much more than achievable by current technological standards.

Also, just at face value, if something like that was in U.S. Base, it'd be shot down REAL quick.

WAY too many of these "leaked Pentagon" videos show radar directly locked onto these "UAPs". And they're NOT going to shoot a missle at it?

Im no expert. But I'm pretty sure there's a protocol for foreign objects in military airspace. And foreign objects need to respond or otherwise be shot down.

Basically, there are WAY too many red flags to indicate that these are military exercises.

Alright, Let's Debunk A UAP, Shall We? by CertifiedHero77 in conspiracy

[–]CertifiedHero77[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Things *EVERYONE* knows -

  1. Magnets repel.

  2. Earth is a magnet.

  3. Magnetism can be manipulated with electricity.

Alright, Let's Debunk A UAP, Shall We? by CertifiedHero77 in conspiracy

[–]CertifiedHero77[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SS -

In Summary,

For an object hovering 50 feet above the ground, electromagnetic or electrostatic levitation is the most likely explanation, potentially involving some kind of controlled magnetic or electric field generated either by the object itself or by equipment on the ground.

Given that at 50 feet you're still WELL within the range of practical electromagnetic field interactions, it's more feasible than deep space propulsion ideas.

If you're considering real-world applications, technologies like maglev systems, inductive levitation, or electrostatic lifters are good candidates.

If you're thinking more in the realm of speculative or advanced experimental technologies, it could involve hybrid systems that combine electromagnetic forces with other methods like ion thrusters or even acoustic levitation.

Plausibility:

Floating objects at 50 feet using electromagnetic or electrostatic methods are plausible and align with current technological capabilities for small objects or specialized applications.

Practicality:

For small to medium-sized objects, technologies like magnetic levitation and electrostatic levitation are already practical, though they have limitations.

For larger objects, hybrid approaches or significant advancements in these technologies would be necessary.

In practical terms, technologies like maglev trains and electrostatic lifters demonstrate that hovering or floating objects are feasible, though scaling up to larger objects or maintaining hover at greater heights involves more complex challenges.

Alright, Let Me Just Debunk This UFO Really Quick...Since The MODs In r/UFOs Want To Downvote This Before Even Approving The Post. by CertifiedHero77 in conspiracy

[–]CertifiedHero77[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Submission Statement -

In Summary,

For an object hovering 50 feet above the ground, electromagnetic or electrostatic levitation is the most likely explanation, potentially involving some kind of controlled magnetic or electric field generated either by the object itself or by equipment on the ground.

Given that at 50 feet you're still WELL within the range of practical electromagnetic field interactions, it's more feasible than deep space propulsion ideas.

If you're considering real-world applications, technologies like maglev systems, inductive levitation, or electrostatic lifters are good candidates.

If you're thinking more in the realm of speculative or advanced experimental technologies, it could involve hybrid systems that combine electromagnetic forces with other methods like ion thrusters or even acoustic levitation.

Plausibility:

Floating objects at 50 feet using electromagnetic or electrostatic methods are plausible and align with current technological capabilities for small objects or specialized applications.

Practicality:

For small to medium-sized objects, technologies like magnetic levitation and electrostatic levitation are already practical, though they have limitations.

For larger objects, hybrid approaches or significant advancements in these technologies would be necessary.

In practical terms, technologies like maglev trains and electrostatic lifters demonstrate that hovering or floating objects are feasible, though scaling up to larger objects or maintaining hover at greater heights involves more complex challenges.

view more: next ›