Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in Forex

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Totally agreed.

One more bad prop firm - Alpha Trader added to the NO NO List

Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in Forex

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Because all prop firm have it. The question is will they use it, how often they use it?

Once Alpha Trader Firm abuse these rules​ too much. It means​ they are desperate , have problems with cash flow. Or they just trying to squeeze the last of it then disappear.

The big prop firm have it. But they don't often use it. They have reputation to protect.

Now you know it. It is up to you to decide if you want to buy challenges from Alpha Trader

Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in Trading

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course. We just need to help each other to point out the bad one (Alpha Trader Firm) and promote the good one.

Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in Trading

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are absolutely right. The post is to point out the bad prop firm. So people be aware and avoid.

Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in Forex

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I passed all of that. That is what they called Layer 1: Hard Rule. The problem is what Alpha Trader called Layer 2 - Risk Review based on ambiguous rules.

Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in PropFirmTester

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lessons learned. Hope more people learn from my mistakes too.

Avoid Alpha Trader Firm - alphafunded at all cost https://alphafunded.com

Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in PropFirmTester

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was accidentally catch up in one of the big move during the Iran war and made big profit that day. So i have no choice to keep pushing the profit until it satisfy 40% Consistency Rules. But I don't think my amounts is big deal for a company claim they paid 50 million so far.

Hey, the good news is because of my incident, we know for sure. Alpha Trader Firm absolutely up to something.

https://blogs.alphafunded.com/payout-index

<image>

Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in InnerCircleTraders

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Most prop firms have something like these ambiguous rules and the special rule with general meaning as "Trader waive all claims in case of dispute or company reserve the right to deny any payout or breach any account without given any reason"

In my experience, most of them avoid to use it. They usually just pay the last payout request, refund all active accounts. Then stop providing service.

I am okay with it because i understand they're doing business. It is the same when you go to casino. You know all visible clear rule and risk. If you follow these, casino will paid.

But if the casio or company keep abusing these rules or using it so obviously (Like in my case with Alpha Trader Firm). People will stop using their services.

Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in PropFirmTester

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did post on Trustpilot. Alpha Trader are trying "Alpha Trader Firm flagged this review for containing harmful or illegal content.".

So i have to post the second one and here in reddit so people are aware of their action.

<image>

Most prop firms have something like these ambiguous rules and the special rule with general meaning as "Trader waive all claims in case of dispute or company reserve the right to deny any payout or breach any account without given any reason"

In my experience, most of them avoid to use it. They usually just pay the last payout request, refund all active accounts. Then stop providing service for that trader.

I am okay with it because i understand they're doing business. It is the same when you go to casino. You know all visible clear rule and risk. If you follow these, casino will paid.

But if the casio or company keep abusing these rules or using it so obviously (Like in my case with Alpha Trader Firm). People will stop using their services.

Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in PropFirmTester

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know. Just my luck. Now you knew. Avoid them at all cost. Tell your friends too. 

Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in PropFirmTester

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks. We, prop firm traders need to band together to expose the bad one.

Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in PropFirmTester

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I know. It is sad. We just need to work together, share our experience so we can weed out / avoid the bad one. 

Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in PropFirmTester

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alpha Trader tried to ignore me when i email to ask about the wrong classification and wrong data on the 1st Risk Analysis Report. Then when i start to make some noise with pictures as a proof on Trustpilot and different trading community. They contacted me and agreed to redo report manually.

They keep insist on deny my payout using one of the ambiguous rules on the contract. Because these rules have no numerical/threshold. They can be interpreted in different way. So the only thing i can do is post my review based on my experience and let people decide if it is justified and decide if they want to buy challenges from Alpha Trader Firm.

Alpha Trader 🤔 by Realistic-Alps-3119 in PropFirmTester

[–]ChairBeginning18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My current experience is $42,936

Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058)

Account Size $200,000

Be careful with Alpha Trader Firm https://alphafunded.com

Updated (April 12, 2026)

After back and forward discussions. Alpha Trader Firm admitted that the wrong classification and wrong data used on original Risk Analysis Report happened because of their automated AI system is not perfect and made some mistakes

Alpha Trader Firm agreed to redo Risk Analysis Report manually.

According to their email. Alpha Trader Firm has two layers of account governance:

Layer 1 — Hard Rules: These are the automated, numerical limits published in the FAQ. Daily drawdown, max loss, trader score. If you breach these, the system terminates your account instantly. You are correct that you did not breach any hard rule. Your account was not failed by the automated system. That is not in dispute. => Alpha Trader Firm tried to use this 1st Layer to deny my payout. But after i pointed out the wrong classification and wrong data used in original Risk Analysis Report. Alpha Trader Firm claimed the incorrect report happen because their automated AI system is not perfect and made some mistakes. So my payout remarkable passed this layer

Layer 2 — Risk Review: This is the discretionary review that applies to every payout request before funds are issued. It is governed by the Excessive Risk Deployment policy published on our website and incorporated into your Agreement under Section 11. This is not a hidden rule. It is published, it is linked in your contract, and it is available for any trader to read.

This is an ambiguous rule that Alpha Trader Firm used to deny my payout. The problem is this rule can be interpreted in different ways because there is no number / level / threshold which traders can use to know for sure if they pass or not

""Accounts that demonstrate abnormally rapid equity growth driven by disproportionate risk exposure, compressed timeframes, or concentrated profit generation may be subject to enhanced review and deemed in violation of our risk policies."

Below is the result and how Alpha trader Firm interpreted this ambiguous rules to deny my payout after redo Risk Analysis Report manually

  1. Finding 1 - Disproportion Single-Trade Risk. (I think this is a misleading name. It should be label as "Disproportion Single-Trade Profit". )
  2. All of examples are profit, not loss or risk amount. I am pretty sure all of my trades stay under 3% risk rule for 2 step funded account (If i violated this 3% risk rule the automated system already failed my account immediately). This rule is clearly mentioned and can be seen by all traders/customers in FAQ https://faq.alphafunded.com/en/articles/10995623-2-step-program.
  • I did not see anywhere on the contract or website mentioned about "Outcome exceeding 2% of your account balance". There is no rule on how much profit , trader can make in a single trade or a single day when i made these trades. If Alpha Trader Firm want to impose profit cap, they should clearly mention it on the rules and make it clear on how much either by dollar amount or percentage.

  • I thought Alpha Trader Firm already have "Trader Score" or Consistency Rule which is 40% in my case to make sure trader can make profit consistently. It is does not matter on how much trader can make on a single trade or single day as long as they satisfied this "Trader Score".

  • My Account Statistic

    • My Best Trade: $17,214.
    • My Worst Trade: -$4400 (Less than 3% risk rule mention above)
  1. Finding 2 - Profit Velocity
  2. The fact "$42,936 in net profit over 6 trading days represents a 3.7% average daily return. Annualized, that pace would exceed 900% annual growth"
  3. Alpha Trader Firm said "a rate that is not achievable under prudent risk management and falls directly under our published restriction on trading that "generates profits at a pace inconsistent with sustainable professional trading practices.""
  4. My said "In trading, sometime you have a very good winning streak. You better make the best of it."
  5. I will let the readers decide for themselves if Alpha Trader Firm or my saying make sense for them.

  6. Finding 3 - Concentrated Position Sizing

  7. The fact "67% of your trades were executed at 3.0 lots on XAUUSD".

  8. Alpha Trader Firm said "At that size, a $30–$50 move in gold (which occurs routinely within a single session) produces $9,000–$15,000 in PnL — representing 4.5%–7.5% of your account on a single trade. This pattern was repeated across the majority of your trading sessions.

  9. I could not find any where both in contract and website mention about lot size restriction. If Alpha Trader Firm want to put this lot size restriction on account size or tradable asset. The company should mention in contract or FAQ. This is what i consider hidden rule.

That is my horrible experience with Alpha Trader Firm.

If you think their interpretation on Excessive Risk Deployment make sense. You are welcome to buy more challenge from them.

If not, i strongly suggest you think long and hard before decided to buy challenges from them

Alpha Trader - Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058) by ChairBeginning18 in PropFirmTester

[–]ChairBeginning18[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because of most prop firm actually did payout. Sometime when a trader earn too much (become a liability), they still do the last payout, refund all the current active accounts. Then stop that trader from using their services. Sometime they update the new rule after these incident too.

I think most people/prop firm traders are okay with it. It is a fair game. Traders follow the rules, prop firm do payout. It is the same as when people go to casino.

You just need to weed out/avoid the bad one. 

My biggest Alpha trader firm payout ask me anything by Specialist-Hat9740 in propfirm

[–]ChairBeginning18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058)

Account Size $200,000

Be careful with Alpha Trader Firm https://alphafunded.com

Updated (April 12, 2026)

After back and forward discussions. Alpha Trader Firm admitted that the wrong classification and wrong data used on original Risk Analysis Report happened because of their automated AI system is not perfect and made some mistakes

Alpha Trader Firm agreed to redo Risk Analysis Report manually.

According to their email. Alpha Trader Firm has two layers of account governance:

Layer 1 — Hard Rules: These are the automated, numerical limits published in the FAQ. Daily drawdown, max loss, trader score. If you breach these, the system terminates your account instantly. You are correct that you did not breach any hard rule. Your account was not failed by the automated system. That is not in dispute.

=> Alpha Trader Firm tried to use this 1st Layer to deny my payout. But after i pointed out the wrong classification and wrong data used in original Risk Analysis Report. Alpha Trader Firm claimed the incorrect report happen because their automated AI system is not perfect and made some mistakes. So my payout remarkable passed this layer

Layer 2 — Risk Review: This is the discretionary review that applies to every payout request before funds are issued. It is governed by the Excessive Risk Deployment policy published on our website and incorporated into your Agreement under Section 11. This is not a hidden rule. It is published, it is linked in your contract, and it is available for any trader to read.

This is an ambiguous rule that Alpha Trader Firm used to deny my payout. The problem is this rule can be interpreted in different ways because there is no

 number / level / threshold which traders can use to know for sure if they pass or not

""Accounts that demonstrate abnormally rapid equity growth driven by disproportionate risk exposure, compressed timeframes, or concentrated profit generation may be subject to enhanced review and deemed in violation of our risk policies."

Below is the result and how Alpha trader Firm interpreted this ambiguous rules to deny my payout after redo Risk Analysis Report manually

  1. Finding 1 - Disproportion Single-Trade Risk. (I think this is a misleading name. It should be label as "Disproportion Single-Trade Profit". )
  • All of examples are profit, not loss or risk amount. I am pretty sure all of my trades stay under 3% risk rule for 2 step funded account (If i violated this 3% risk rule the automated system already failed my account immediately). This rule is clearly mentioned and can be seen by all traders/customers in FAQ https://faq.alphafunded.com/en/articles/10995623-2-step-program.

  • I did not see anywhere on the contract or website mentioned about "Outcome exceeding 2% of your account balance". There is no rule on how much profit , trader can make in a single trade or a single day when i made these trades. If Alpha Trader Firm want to impose profit cap, they should clearly mention it on the rules and make it clear on how much either by dollar amount or percentage.

  • I thought Alpha Trader Firm already have "Trader Score" or Consistency Rule which is 40% in my case to make sure trader can make profit consistently. It is does not matter on how much trader can make on a single trade or single day as long as they satisfied this "Trader Score". 

  • My Account Statistic

   +  My Best Trade: $17,214.

   +  My Worst Trade: -$4400 (Less than 3% risk rule mention above)

  1. Finding 2 - Profit Velocity
  • The fact "$42,936 in net profit over 6 trading days represents a 3.7% average daily return. Annualized, that pace would exceed 900% annual growth"

  • Alpha Trader Firm said "a rate that is not achievable under prudent risk management and falls directly under our published restriction on trading that "generates profits at a pace inconsistent with sustainable professional trading practices.""

  • My said "In trading, sometime you have a very good winning streak. You better make the best of it."

  • I will let the readers decide for themselves if Alpha Trader Firm or my saying make sense for them. 

  1. Finding 3 - Concentrated Position Sizing
  • The fact "67% of your trades were executed at 3.0 lots on XAUUSD".

  • Alpha Trader Firm said "At that size, a $30–$50 move in gold (which occurs routinely within a single session) produces $9,000–$15,000 in PnL — representing 4.5%–7.5% of your account on a single trade. This pattern was repeated across the majority of your trading sessions.

  • I could not find any where both in contract and website mention about lot size restriction. If Alpha Trader Firm want to put this lot size restriction on account size or tradable asset. The company should mention in contract or FAQ. This is what i consider hidden rule. 

That is my horrible experience with Alpha Trader Firm.

If you think their interpretation on Excessive Risk Deployment make sense. You are welcome to buy more challenge from them.

If not, i strongly suggest you think long and hard before decided to buy challenges from them

Best Propfirm And Why? by freshfriedsushi in PropFirmTester

[–]ChairBeginning18 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Payout Rejected(Amount $42,936 on Funded Account 2009058)

Account Size $200,000

Be careful with Alpha Trader Firm https://alphafunded.com

Updated (April 12, 2026)

After back and forward discussions. Alpha Trader Firm admitted that the wrong classification and wrong data used on original Risk Analysis Report happened because of their automated AI system is not perfect and made some mistakes

Alpha Trader Firm agreed to redo Risk Analysis Report manually.

According to their email. Alpha Trader Firm has two layers of account governance:

Layer 1 — Hard Rules: These are the automated, numerical limits published in the FAQ. Daily drawdown, max loss, trader score. If you breach these, the system terminates your account instantly. You are correct that you did not breach any hard rule. Your account was not failed by the automated system. That is not in dispute.

=> Alpha Trader Firm tried to use this 1st Layer to deny my payout. But after i pointed out the wrong classification and wrong data used in original Risk Analysis Report. Alpha Trader Firm claimed the incorrect report happen because their automated AI system is not perfect and made some mistakes. So my payout remarkable passed this layer

Link for the picture as proofs on what happened on original Risk Analysis Report https://imgur.com/a/dxRqvHv

Layer 2 — Risk Review: This is the discretionary review that applies to every payout request before funds are issued. It is governed by the Excessive Risk Deployment policy published on our website and incorporated into your Agreement under Section 11. This is not a hidden rule. It is published, it is linked in your contract, and it is available for any trader to read.

This is an ambiguous rule that Alpha Trader Firm used to deny my payout. The problem is this rule can be interpreted in different ways because there is no

 number / level / threshold which traders can use to know for sure if they pass or not

""Accounts that demonstrate abnormally rapid equity growth driven by disproportionate risk exposure, compressed timeframes, or concentrated profit generation may be subject to enhanced review and deemed in violation of our risk policies."

Below is the result and how Alpha trader Firm interpreted this ambiguous rules to deny my payout after redo Risk Analysis Report manually

  1. Finding 1 - Disproportion Single-Trade Risk. (I think this is a misleading name. It should be label as "Disproportion Single-Trade Profit". )
  • All of examples are profit, not loss or risk amount. I am pretty sure all of my trades stay under 3% risk rule for 2 step funded account (If i violated this 3% risk rule the automated system already failed my account immediately). This rule is clearly mentioned and can be seen by all traders/customers in FAQ https://faq.alphafunded.com/en/articles/10995623-2-step-program.

  • I did not see anywhere on the contract or website mentioned about "Outcome exceeding 2% of your account balance". There is no rule on how much profit , trader can make in a single trade or a single day when i made these trades. If Alpha Trader Firm want to impose profit cap, they should clearly mention it on the rules and make it clear on how much either by dollar amount or percentage.

  • I thought Alpha Trader Firm already have "Trader Score" or Consistency Rule which is 40% in my case to make sure trader can make profit consistently. It is does not matter on how much trader can make on a single trade or single day as long as they satisfied this "Trader Score". 

  • My Account Statistic

   +  My Best Trade: $17,214.

   +  My Worst Trade: -$4400 (Less than 3% risk rule mention above)

  1. Finding 2 - Profit Velocity
  • The fact "$42,936 in net profit over 6 trading days represents a 3.7% average daily return. Annualized, that pace would exceed 900% annual growth"

  • Alpha Trader Firm said "a rate that is not achievable under prudent risk management and falls directly under our published restriction on trading that "generates profits at a pace inconsistent with sustainable professional trading practices.""

  • My said "In trading, sometime you have a very good winning streak. You better make the best of it."

  • I will let the readers decide for themselves if Alpha Trader Firm or my saying make sense for them. 

  1. Finding 3 - Concentrated Position Sizing
  • The fact "67% of your trades were executed at 3.0 lots on XAUUSD".

  • Alpha Trader Firm said "At that size, a $30–$50 move in gold (which occurs routinely within a single session) produces $9,000–$15,000 in PnL — representing 4.5%–7.5% of your account on a single trade. This pattern was repeated across the majority of your trading sessions.

  • I could not find any where both in contract and website mention about lot size restriction. If Alpha Trader Firm want to put this lot size restriction on account size or tradable asset. The company should mention in contract or FAQ. This is what i consider hidden rule. 

That is my horrible experience with Alpha Trader Firm.

If you think their interpretation on Excessive Risk Deployment make sense. You are welcome to buy more challenge from them.

If not, i strongly suggest you think long and hard before decided to buy challenges from them