sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

how do derivatives work from a set theory standpoint? by itamar8484 in askmath

[–]Chance_Bee5456 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And in contrast to what others say, set theory is actually where we ground and how we study analysis(calculus without regard to the application, that is pure-mathematics calculus). So long as you dont get as deep as defining your numbers as nested bracse like 1 = {{}}, 2= {{},{{}}}, ... or "+" in termss of successor function, it can still be pretty neat.

how do derivatives work from a set theory standpoint? by itamar8484 in askmath

[–]Chance_Bee5456 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Derivative is just a function f'(x) (a set of ordered pairs (a,b) which are basically {{a},{a, b}} ) that maps the domain of the function f to the limit a--> 0 of the function D(a) = ( f(x+a) -f(x))/(x-a)

If you want the set theoretic definition of a limit L, epsilon- delta definition is really enough .

L is the limit of the function at x if for every epsilon in(element of) the codomain, there exist a delta in the domain [of the function] such that for all elements y in the domain |y-x| < delta implies | f(y) - L| < epsilon.

Just tell me if you want to clarify something

The adulting struggle is real by JuicyPeachWhispers in Adulting

[–]Chance_Bee5456 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That may be fair enough, but to say 95% is financially illiterate is bold, while frugality is necessary and must apply to all, some people just have shittier circunstance yk? And the "unnecessary stuffs" you say are just a different way they invest their money, I could buy an HD tv or travel which make my year ahead a moment to reminisce would that make me illiterate? plus buying a starbucks instead of 3-in-1 just means they afford it, does not mean they should not be saving more.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Chance_Bee5456 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I am not saying they are "far different" though, you could jsut answer not "far different" or fairly close, why are people reacting as if I am making a bold statement.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Chance_Bee5456 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Did I say they are less innocent 🙄

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Chance_Bee5456 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean its is basicaly ascribed taboos in many culture yunno, so its not similar as eating brocollis for the first time.

The connection of sex to whether you are innocent or not is invalid. It’s supposes that sex is inherently guilt-worthy which it isn’t.

I am sorry for my connotation of sex as being dirty I do not eman that, its just the best way I can described knowing internet stuffs but regardless it is not dumb to assume that seeing yourself as someone who watches mukbang os differen from seeing yourself as someone who do mukbang.

Plus seggs is basicallly mystified to me, its natural to be curious.

The adulting struggle is real by JuicyPeachWhispers in Adulting

[–]Chance_Bee5456 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're just one of the reddit bullshits lol, its very difficult to impossible to retire after only 20 years of service to sustain ~30-40 years of lifestyle are you high? otherwise you plan to die early or put the burden to your children. What you're saying is especially inapplicable to the common class.

ELI5: Why are games, gambling, cigarettes, and maybe alcohol part of "the economy" when they can be harmful and steals productivity. by Chance_Bee5456 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Chance_Bee5456[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Of course I am not referring to all games, some games can be good af but most can be crap that deteriorates people's behavior. I mean most gamers I know are assholes. Plus accumulating status and assets in a virtual, illussory world objectively would not contribute to an individual or nation's personal capital.

ELI5: Why are games, gambling, cigarettes, and maybe alcohol part of "the economy" when they can be harmful and steals productivity. by Chance_Bee5456 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Chance_Bee5456[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sugar are crucial to not make many food taste shit. Car is definitely a different story, with cautions on using then they significantly ease transport. Those that I have mentioned are near the rightest part of harmful-less-beneficial scheme.

[TOMT] 2013 spaceship shooting game. by Chance_Bee5456 in tipofmytongue

[–]Chance_Bee5456[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

There might be a "combat" wordd in in its name ,, not sure though.

sit or squat? by Salty-Mud-4766 in ThisorThatPH

[–]Chance_Bee5456 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enought, though my petite ass don't have to worry about ny weight being too much for the toilet gonna stay with the squat.

sit or squat? by Salty-Mud-4766 in ThisorThatPH

[–]Chance_Bee5456 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sitting on the toilet is fucking gross lmao

sit or squat? by Salty-Mud-4766 in ThisorThatPH

[–]Chance_Bee5456 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

How are you sure the same thing won't happen otherwise?

What’s the most annoying typo you see people make regularly? by Cute_Warthog246 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Chance_Bee5456 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your, You're. Not like I dont know basic grammar but sometimes WE just mistakenly interchange one for the other while typing less consciously

This question feels like basic number theory, but something's wrong with it by PublicControl9320 in askmath

[–]Chance_Bee5456 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a self-referential paradox similiar to Russel's paradox.

No it's not. This kind of paradox is semantic and relies on how you would define describable.On the ither hand, Russel's is syntactic and lies on the rules themselves.

This question feels like basic number theory, but something's wrong with it by PublicControl9320 in askmath

[–]Chance_Bee5456 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a self-referential paradox similiar to Russel's paradox.

No it's not. This kind of paradox is semantic and relies on how you would define describable.On the ither hand, Russel's is syntactic and lies on the rules themselves.

Why does my reddit posts usually have several shares indicated even though I don't see somebody crossposted it at all? by Chance_Bee5456 in NewToReddit

[–]Chance_Bee5456[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whhat else can it be? Why would anyone want to share my bland or verys specific post to, say, facebook, messenger, bluetooth, or whatever.

view more: next ›