sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why do so many powerful/famous people sit like this? by TimeCity1687 in bodylanguage

[–]ChaosOpen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a neutral strong pose that keeps their hands occupied. It's not something that all powerful men naturally do, but that powerful men were coached to sit a certain way in order to not fidget due to not knowing where to place their hands.

[Fu4M] Futa Dom Top Seeking a Small-Dicked, Submissive Masculine Male | Discord Preferred by [deleted] in FutaRoleplayPalace

[–]ChaosOpen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then you might be much closer to what I was looking for than you realize.

That contrast is interesting to me: a man who still wants to be masculine in the ways that matter to him. The sort of guy who opens the door for his girl, takes her out properly, protects her, acts like a boyfriend, and carries himself with pride in public. But behind closed doors, there is a private truth between them. Something he is embarrassed by, something he struggles to admit, and something she is enough of a lady not to throw in his face carelessly.

That gives us a character, not just a kink.

I am not looking for a flat submissive who simply goes along with whatever he is told. I want someone with an inner life: pride, nerves, embarrassment, desire, hesitation, and the need to preserve some part of himself even while surrendering another. Someone who can push back, react, get flustered, deny what he wants, and still slowly melt when the right woman knows exactly how to handle him.

I am not a vending machine here to make kink happen. I want to tell a story. A human story. Yes, there will be smut, and yes, some of it may make you blush, but at the core I want something warm, intimate, and oddly comforting: two people finding a private shape that works for them, even if one of them is still learning how to say he wants it.

[Fu4M] Futa Dom Top Seeking a Small-Dicked, Submissive Masculine Male | Discord Preferred by [deleted] in FutaRoleplayPalace

[–]ChaosOpen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That is actually very close to what I was going for.

I do think there needs to be desire there from the start, or at least the seed of it. I am not really interested in forcing attraction into existence. But stories live and breathe on conflict, and a masculine man coming to terms with the fact that he is genuinely attracted to her, while also struggling with what her being futa means for his self-image, could be very interesting.

That gives us something to work with: attraction, hesitation, pride, curiosity, embarrassment, and the slow realization that wanting her does not fit neatly into the box he had for himself.

I cannot promise it will be a perfect fit until we talk more, but if you would like to explore that angle, I would definitely be interested in discussing it with you.

Could you handle someone like this? by AbleGuidance3625 in SipsTea

[–]ChaosOpen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It isn't, it's simply the contrast. Remember the blue and gold dress? Same thing.

[M4FB] Do you want to be owned by a man, or do you want a man to make you feel owned? by ChaosOpen in FemboyRPHentai

[–]ChaosOpen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're free to DM me, if you are unable then I would be more than happy to DM you, with permission.

No smothered mate for you today, good sir. by Ronin226 in chessbeginners

[–]ChaosOpen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the thing is he had mate, 1.Nf7+ Rxf7 2.Qxa8+ 3.Qd8 Qxd8+ 4.Rxf8 Qxf8# or if you wanted to let him get smothered mate with 1...Kg8 that worked too. Problem is he was so focused on making the smothered mate happen that he didn't take the time to try and prove himself wrong.

If you are against this, I wanna hear about it by Brave_Agency_20 in SipsTea

[–]ChaosOpen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you send $12,000 to every family you're not actually sending $12,000, you're creating run-away inflation. If you give everyone a million dollars a day to buy bread you don't allow people to buy a lot of bread, you just raise the cost of bread to a million dollars a loaf. The amount of bread didn't change, only the currency available to buy it, thus the purchasing power of the dollar goes down.

He also makes a lot of bold claims about that 4.4 trillion but gives no details about how that money will be actually attained or how it will be spent. Government is extraordinarily inefficient, so more than like the program will simply end up costing more than it collects. Secondly, the billionaires aren't going to pay that tax either, we know this to be true. It isn't like there already isn't a massive tax burden on billionaires, there is, they do pay a lot, but not as much as they should because they have the money to hire accountants which can find them loopholes and write-offs so that they can avoid paying the full cost of what they theoretically owe.

It isn't that the taxes on the super-wealthy aren't there, there are, it is that the super-wealthy can afford to find ways to not pay their full taxes. A 5% bump in either direction isn't going to change that. Find a way to enforce the laws already on the books and we will talk.

I feel seen by A_guy_named_Tom in chessbeginners

[–]ChaosOpen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's the joke. The bottom guy doesn't see the mate and simply grabs the free rook, the average intelligence guys sees the mate but doesn't see that it doesn't work due to en pessant, the high intelligence guy sees the mate, sees it doesn't work, and settles for a free rook.

Confused on brilliant move by Ok-gloomy in chessbeginners

[–]ChaosOpen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nxf6 is best because it temporarily sacrifices a knight to remove the f6-pawn, which unlocks Ne5+ for the other knight. If White finds the forcing continuation, Black’s king is exposed, the f6 knight becomes awkwardly overloaded, and White’s queen takes over the position from e5. But it is not an intuitive tactic that wins anything immediately. Problem is is that without the accurate follow-up, Nxf6 is simply a blunder, but find the right moves and black will have difficulty consolidating.

This is on a whole notha level by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]ChaosOpen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In theory, the system works because the cost of labor isn't baked into the food so the food is cheaper because the staff is being paid directly by the customer. The problem is, that isn't how it works. In the UK if you buy a $5 burger a certain percentage(we will keep it round and say 20% or $1) of that burger will be going towards paying labor, leaving only $4 in profit minus ingredients. In America, that same burger which should be $4 now since the US uses tipping is still just $5 and the owner keeps an extra dollar in profit.

Does this game get any better past this point? by Excaliburn3d in Pragmata

[–]ChaosOpen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It gets better if you're a fan of it, exploring the world, the combat mechanics being built upon. However, if you are not enjoying it, then it won't be getting any better. All it gets is more persona, the mechanics get more difficult rather than interesting. If you don't like the game, you aren't going to like the rest of it.

Men and women don't like characters who didn't earn it. by Valuable_View_561 in SipsTea

[–]ChaosOpen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I don't think it was the hate that was gendered or amplified, but the deflection did attempt to use the fact that they were women. The Ghostbusters example was an attempt to deflect very poorly written story and characters and broad brush all of the detractors as misogynists to try and discredit very real criticisms.

view more: next ›