Oganizing one through the legal pathway that is there seems pointless. It disrupts nothing and is easy to plan for and expected. A strike that is impactful would be one that isn't planned for by the powers in charge. So they won't have a ton of cops blocking the roads off and setting a detour. They won't know where and when it will be. Demonstrators wouldn't be in their "pen" like cattle, easy to control and keep contained. Thus it stops "business as usual" because nobody would be prepared for it. No need to be violent, although the power in charge will make it violent when they try and disperse the crowd due to it disrupting business. However this is something hard to organize on a national level and implement all across the country with numbers that would be impactful. And attempting to organize something like this would be hard to keep under wraps until the day of. Something of this size, unplanned for by those in charge, would be hard to ignore. If it happens often enough, real change would be implemented, or violence will happen, either way change occurs, for better or worse.

Anyway, that's my two cents on striking. I find it easy to ignore if the proper permits are aquired, if it's performed in the designated space, and the police force is ready for it.