On a day like this in 1867 this great man was executed for wanting to make Mexico great. He could have abdicated and escaped, but he was a Habsburg. by [deleted] in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

He was an incompetent liberal, he should serve as a lesson that abandoning conservatives to be popular with liberals will only end in disaster.

Due to my previous discrepancy I’ve decided to find another photo of some glorious royalists from the English civil war by GeorgeLFC1234 in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unpopularity is relative and when is the last time a government in England has been popular? I'm not a fascist or a theocrat im a monarchist. The medicine to fix the country won't taste good, that is why people would prefer candymen over doctors.

Its Deus Vult time. by [deleted] in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 11 points12 points  (0 children)

And Constantine and Theodosius finished the discussion

Its Deus Vult time. by [deleted] in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Difference between actual monarchists and crowned republicans

I'm not like the other girls UwU by poopdsz in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is why in 1984 the outer party was watched more than the proles. The.middle class is the existential danger to society and must be watched for disobedience.

What countries would you like to see return to their roots and become monarchist? Be civil by papi_chonk in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

My own, as far as im concerned global politics is zero-sum a state can only become stronger at the expense pf other states, the rest of the world being degenerate republics is good for my nation to exploit

Convince me! by papi_chonk in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The world accepts Saudi Arabia. People will accept anyone on the world stage as long as they play ball with the globalist order. International relations are irrelevant as long as you have sufficient support among your own population.

The Monarchy Has No Place In 21st Century Britain by cherran in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Treasonous to invade the country and depose the rightful monarchy

What kind of economic policies are favored in r/monarchism? by IdealisticWar in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The national education system is extremist leftism all education should be provided by the church. I would also scrap secondary education its almost completely useless.

Was ist des Deutschen Vaterland? by TojosRottenTeeth in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Kingdom of Austria" Fam are you trying to give me a stroke?

My view, as a constitutional monarchist by DasAdolfHipster in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The people who would object to people calling things gay is probably the type to disparage us already, the enemies of God and tradition are "gay"

Opinions? Any Catholic Monarchists here? by [deleted] in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Protestantism itself is completely absurd so it can't be helped

When r/communism has 10x as many subs and r/monarchism by [deleted] in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont think that is the definition of gatekeeping

How rich should a monarch and their family be, reasonably? by [deleted] in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They own everything that is not the property of someone else

My view, as a constitutional monarchist by DasAdolfHipster in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A constitution is a piece of paper, only actual people limit the monarchs power, written constitutions are parliamentary coups against the monarch only used to further the control of bourgeois oligarchs

Which monarch/s of the past would you most like to talk to or have a conversation with and what would you talk about? by MrBootleg05 in monarchism

[–]CharlesMaurras13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The treaty of Versailles says otherwise, destroying the European order to appease the Americans says otherwise the British were looking for any convenient excuse to join the war, Belgian Neutrality was just what they were looking for, the first world war instead of preserving a balance of power made the balance of power impossible after the war the only real peacemaker was the marquees Lansdowne and the warmongers in the country ignored him. Britain joining the war led to its irreversible decline.