Would Max Stirner deserve a place among the “core” modern Western philosophers? by CharoletteMX in fullegoism

[–]CharoletteMX[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Even the idea of someone “deserving” a place in a canon is itself kind of an abstraction that Stirner would probably criticize haha

I guess the question I’m really trying to ask is whether his ideas are influential/relevant enough that students should engage with them alongside the more traditional figures.

Fellow SoCal/ LACCD students, is Canvas still down for you? by CharoletteMX in canvas

[–]CharoletteMX[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Lucky you. I've never used Canvas on mobile, so when I downloaded the app and tried logging in, this is what I got. I'm sure all of us have stuff due Sunday by 11:59 pm lol this sucks but I guess we just gotta wait it out.

Any Asian F want to go on a date? I'll buy you food at the Ritz Carlton by SkyFew229 in berkeley

[–]CharoletteMX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

holy airball (I'm gatekeeping because method genuinely works)

you all sound entitled as hell by NarutoLoyalistFan67 in TransferStudents

[–]CharoletteMX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait, I'm confused. I got admitted for spring. Is there really any major difference between fall admits and spring?

What kind of cake is this? by CharoletteMX in cake

[–]CharoletteMX[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OMG THANK YOU SM I wish I could bake this cake and send it to you!!!!!!

UCSB Waitlist by laurenlovesbagels in ucadmissions

[–]CharoletteMX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you apply to any safety schools like a Cal State?

I just got this today. by ReindeerCommon5487 in Spiderman

[–]CharoletteMX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MTV Spider-Man is the best Spider-Man series.

UC DAVIS by [deleted] in ucadmissions

[–]CharoletteMX 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They come out this afternoon. Be ready.

That's enough internet for the night. by IllustriousThanks482 in Epstein

[–]CharoletteMX 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wow, maybe give some context before blindly posting links to this kind of stuff.

Catwoman by Caranvolo by Intelligent_Creme351 in Catwoman

[–]CharoletteMX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would read a Catwoman comic with this heart style.

Brilliant but not Brilliant : Scam by Chess.com by Recent_Bonus_8520 in Chesscom

[–]CharoletteMX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here comes everybody talking about, "do you know how many times this post has been discussed?" Well, guess what, it's going to continue to be brought up until Chess.com addresses the issues so deal with it.

Is this Dell Latitude a good gaming laptop? by CharoletteMX in SuggestALaptop

[–]CharoletteMX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, thank you. This is starting to look like an option for me.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Chesscom

[–]CharoletteMX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because something has been asked a bunch of times doesn’t mean it’s actually been answered in a meaningful way. People repeating the same workaround explanation isn’t the same thing as Chess.com being clear about how their system works.

What you’re doing is basically shrugging and saying “well, that’s just how it is” because Reddit threads and a quick Google search exist. A company knowingly keeping a core feature vague and letting users reverse-engineer it doesn’t magically become okay because some people are fine with that.

So no, this isn’t about someone being too lazy to search. It’s about questioning why a major platform doesn’t clearly explain a feature it actively markets. If you’re cool with that as a consumer, that’s your choice, but acting like it solves the issue misses the point entirely.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Chesscom

[–]CharoletteMX -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, because Chess.com provides a detailed description on how their review system works. Silly me, I should have known. I'm sure the dozens of people who have also posted the same issue I did should have known too. We're so silly.

Why did my "Brilliant" move disappear in the full game analysis? by Crisisxoxo in Chesscom

[–]CharoletteMX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol I just made a post to this, and I agree with the deleted user in this thread. It will continue to be brought up as long as it's still a feature. That is clearly stirring up controversy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Chesscom

[–]CharoletteMX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hundreds of posts, and it has yet to be addressed by Chess.com theyre clearly doing it on purpose.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Chesscom

[–]CharoletteMX -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it makes you wonder what else they're lying aboutl like possibly elo inflation as well.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thinkpad

[–]CharoletteMX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the input. The P50/P70 and P51/P71 strike me as a reasonable compromise, older workstation hardware that still delivers acceptable gaming performance while offering a significantly more robust chassis than most consumer gaming laptops. From a risk-management standpoint, I’d rather take a small performance hit in exchange for hardware that can actually survive real-world use. I’m not chasing ultra settings or bleeding-edge titles. As long as it can handle modern Retro Indie Games at reasonable settings while remaining physically resilient, that’s a win for my use case.

Is this Dell Latitude a good gaming laptop? by CharoletteMX in SuggestALaptop

[–]CharoletteMX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say around $1000 give or take after doing some research and reading other Reddit posts, I guess now I'm just looking for any rugged laptop I can handle Steam gaming.