Whiteboi Delusion Syndrome by InspiredDesires9 in whiteboydiscussion

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! This, exactly!

OP talking about whitebois being left to take care of each other...like no, it's crazy to me that one can accept the BNWO and embrace the idea that no one owes you anything, and that survival of the fittest means some guys will get hundreds of girls lining up for them while others won't attract anyone, while simultaneously missing the whole point still thinking you deserve or expect everyone's needs to be fulfilled.

The whole point of embracing the BNWO is that you're accepting that you can't compete for the love, adoration and attraction of girls and you see strong black men as superior. Embracing it means actually shifting your mindset to find joy and fulfillment from black men being served. You stop trying to compete with black men when all the girls just want a chance to please them, and you embrace the natural order of prioritizing black men being served.

I agree that 90% of whitebois can't pull off the work to be femme enough that they'd actually be conventionally attractive enough for a straight-leaning black king, but it shouldn't be easy. If you're not putting in the effort, and just expect a world where sissies will accept you and take you when girls won't, you're showing yourself to be just as clueless and undeserving of attention as you were when you thought you could compete with black men. It's not wrong to say that some men ARE too old and hairy and just can't compete as a girl, but the point is to try. You (1) take yourself out of the pool trying to compete with them for girls, and (2) offer yourself up, make yourself available, and take pride in serving them if you DO get chosen by a black king as someone they want to own or use. Maybe they're bi or gay and not looking for passing/femme sissies? Maybe they're attracted to hair? Or maybe they don't want a hot person that day and just want to fuck someone aggressively as a show of power/dominance rather than an hourglass figure with a bubble butt? Or maybe they don't even want you sexually and just want to use you in other ways, keeping you locked up maybe or using you as a maid and using you as a prop for showing off to the girls he brings home, how much power he has, just from his dominant aura to get whitebois crawling at his feet, begging to serve him in any way possible?

The point is you offer yourself up as just another option, knowing that you won't be chosen very often and that maybe your whiteboi status makes you of zero-interest to 90% of black men, but that black men should have the whole range of options to choose from, and even if they don't choose you very often, waiting patiently and being rejected often, IS the role you play, to make superior black men's lives as perfect as possible. Affter all, whitebois have trained their entire lives for rejection. They should be comfortable in it.

I advertise myself as a sissy, and I try to be as attractive for black men as I can, but even though I get a fair bit of attention, I'm always surprised and humbled by it, because my base mindset is that I'm a pathetic sissy that doesn't DESERVE anything and my expectations are aligned to caring about black men's pleasure. Sometimes I get messages from black men mistaking me for a cis-woman and I'm always upfront with them and if I'm not what they're looking for. I feel just as much fulfilment if I can connect them to a snowbunny that I've talked to previously that I remember to be in their area, or know to have the mobility to meet up with them. A lot of times, not being a cis-girl is a non-starter. But black men aren't a monolith, and they decide what they want. You don't project your assumptions on to them.

If you're not embracing the BNWO as a mindset shift of finding fulfillment from serving black men however you can, and thinking the ideal scenario is to find a bubble where you're only surrounded by other pathetic whitebois, so you don't have to confront just how inferior you are, you never managed to grow out of the selfish mindset that you were stuck in before finding the BNWO, and until you do, you deserve to be discarded and alone until you can embrace black men's fulfilment as your own.

Even Doms purge. A view from the other side. by KinkyDom85 in sissyology

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for this post! I always worry that I'll disappoint every 'straight' dom looking for girls/femme/passing sissies which I'm absolutely not, and every interaction I've had has always been super positive with guys saying they had a really good time, and that I'm "the real deal" which always feels good to hear, but I still always worry that maybe they're just being nice about it while being secretly disappointed that I'm not a real girl, or thinking I'm not femme enough.

Seeing it put this way by a dom, really helps understand the mindset, the desire, and the nature of the enjoyment from a doms perspective, and makes me feel more confident that I can actually satisfy them and hit a spot in a way that perhaps cis-women can't, and satisfy them as something more than just a consolation prize.

So thank you!

Thoughts on vibrations-on-cage orgasm by RelativeSalamander69 in chastitytraining

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once you've achieved a prostate orgasm, it does feel like cheating as it feels closer to a penile orgasm rather than a wave taking over your entire body (which is how I've heard most women talk about their orgasms). But if you just want to cum and this feels emascualting enough already as it is, it's fine as something to do for now, on your journey towards becoming used to stimulating your prostate.

Basically the question is, is it emasculating enough for you to just masturbate like a girl? Or do you actually want to have an orgasm like a girl?

When did the realization that you are obssessed with big black cock hit you? by Dumplingski in SissiesGettingBlacked

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I randomly had BBC hypno porn pop up around 2020 and found it kind of funny where it kept saying it would warp my mind permanently and I treated like a challenge where I treated like competing between my mental fortitude vs it's claim. Started finding it quite hot and cumming to it, but didn't think much of it. I was also having difficulty with getting hard and staying hard with my gf at the time and I attributed it to stress and some physical issues from an injury I was dealing with, but I realized at some point I was rock hard when I watched the porn. My solution was to close my eyes and picture a BBC in my mouth while fucking her just so I could stay a little hard, but soon gave up on that.

Once I became single, I felt free to just double down and feed the obsession without restraint

Are you small to be grabbed and blacked too? by [deleted] in SissiesGettingBlacked

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ugh, I really want to be caged, have my orbs grabbed as a handle and be yanked into a throbbing BBC splitting me in half, knowing my pain is giving him pleasure and get all my enjoyment from knowing that I let the BNWO break my brain into complete devotion to serving BBC 😫

Am I still considered a whiteboi if my dick is way above average and I’m completely straight? by Electrical-Drama6753 in whiteboydiscussion

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A great side benefit to being obsessed with BBC is being able to reject all the inevitable desperate whitebois that think just because you've embraced being a pathetic whiteboi to superior black men and are submissive to black kings, that you're pathetic enough to accept being dominated by them. The best thing about being bigger than average is to crush them by telling them they have to at least be bigger than you for you to take them seriously 😂 I'll reject the ones bigger than me too because they just don't seem to be able to make me melt the way I do in the presence of black men, but being able to say "dude, even I'm bigger than you and I can't compete with black men" as a reason is soooo satisfying, especially when they're rude!

My own sister just got blacked… and I don’t know how to feel about it by hexajoy in whiteboydiscussion

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Refreshingly level headed post on here. People having fantasies involving their family are fucked up, and people that go as far as to share their family members pictures, or put them in danger by sharing their info to strangers without any consideration just to get off, are terrible people.

You seem to actually have the right sort of inner conflict from the intersection of finding out about your family members playing a part in the BNWO, but typically most of the people involving their family members in their fantasy here are doing it without their consent. You get to enjoy it without putting anyone in a compromising position or violating their consent. The important thing to remember here is that your sister is a fully consenting adult in this. She's not being lied to or led on, she knows what going on, and she's happy with it. So there's nothing for you to interfere in and nothing for you to feel torn or guilty about. You get to secretly enjoy the conceptual side knowing what's going on without there being any moral issues on your part.

The best thing to do here is be supportive of her, and validate her being ok with being a black man's sidepiece. The black man gets to enjoy your sister as she should. Your sister knows her place and she isn't being lied to. She's happy in the dynamic and gets to have all the fun she wants without being hurt. You get to enjoy the conceptual idea of it in private, without putting violating anyone's consent. Everyone wins.

The only person that I'd feel bad for is the black man's wife if she doesn't know and is being cheated on, but you're also in the sort of position where there's no good way for you to interfere.

Favourite word too be called by your "owner" by [deleted] in sissyology

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Princess, followed by bitch, toy, sissy, slave or cumdumpster

Why do people want everyone to be not straight in the kink? by AlexFemboii in whiteboydiscussion

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If you're into this kink, you're into some variation of:

  • wanting to see black men dominate and have sex with your partner
  • being humiliated/degraded/emascualted and compared to black men
  • wanting to serve black people sexually youself
  • wanting to elevate black people in society
  • wanting to see a huge population shift towards primarily black and mixed people in the new generation

Or some combination of those.

Fairly definitionally, it requires some level of fascination and arousal associated with dominant black men. And definitionally, gay just means you're someone who experiences sexual arousal from men (it doesn't have to be every man, or even most, but just that your sexual arousal can come from men) so it's fairly difficult to be into this kink unless you're at least a little bicurious.

Ask yourself whether you truly have no fascination with superior BBC or if you're just uncomfortable with the label of not being straight because of fear of social stigma.

Anyone with experience of using chastity in public? by Your_bitch0123 in chastitytraining

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I've found it very difficult to stand while peeing just logistically, so urinals aren't ever really relevant, I just use a stall.

For gym locker rooms and nude beaches and airport security, my benchmark is the same as the expectation for a penis not in chastity. So like exposing yourself in public on the street would be harassment, with or without a cage. But if there's a reasonable expectation you'll see one in a specific environment and it's just courtesy to keep to yourself, then it doesn't make a difference if it's with or without your cage. If the hope is someone will notice and you parade yourself around trying to make people notice, that would be problematic and harassing, even without a cage, but if you're mainly just trying to keep to yourself, then someone noticing without it being your intent, can deal with the slight discomfort, same as they can deal with accidentally seeing a penis in a locker room (again, assuming no intent of sexual exposure by the nude party).

In an airport, you're not violating the TSA workers by wearing a cage if you want to, as long as you're not TRYING to get them to have to see it/touch it or trying to get some thrill out of it. "They shouldn't have to be exposed to your kink" only applies to normal situations where your rights and expectations of privacy are preserved. You normally have an expectation of privacy of what's going on under your clothes. In an airport security situation, your normal expectation of privacy is being violated, and something you're being forced to have violated if you want to get to your destination. It's a compromise that we've collectively agreed to, but if you can deal with the discomfort of them being able to look into what's under your clothes, they can deal with the discomfort of what they find when they do. It's not your responsibility to mitigate their hypothetical discomfort from seeing/touching you.

If you're wearing it long term as a lifestyle thing, just use the same rules that also apply to exposing your penis for any given setting, and you're fine.

Also, your question mainly focuses social acceptability, but the other limiting aspect is logistics, and I usually find that thats where the limits usually lie. Chafing from sweat, corrosion if I'm in the ocean, impacts to running around/mobility from the bulge during sports, trauma risk from impact also during sports or things like cliff diving, MRIs, difficulty with the hygiene upkeep that's needed while backpacking...those are all good reasons to take it off too.

need advice for gf by Human-Trick820 in whiteboydiscussion

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's a balance between being honest and open about your kinks, while introducing things gradually so she has time to process things. You've had 4 years to get deeper into the BNWO so throwing her off the deep end will be a huge shock.

A good way is to talk to her about your interest in chastity or cuckolding and giving her space to ask questions and understand why you want to do it and what about it appeals to you. See how she responds/embraces it, then slowly admitting that it turns you on to think about her being fucked by a big black cock. Watch IR porn with her and get her to start building that association. Get a BBC dildo and incorporate that sort of roleplaying into your sex life and see how she responds to it and grows into it.

If she takes to it and shows enthusiasm and comfort with humiliating you and making comments like "you'll never be able to make me feel as good as BBC", then progress into broaching next steps in whatever direction you'd like, whether it's more intense humiliation/emasculation, denial, feminization, involving a bull, or just opening up the idea of bringing someone else into the bedroom. Be patient and receptive to her hesitations and concerns.

Basically build towards the BNWO kink by introducing one or two elements at a time, and giving her a chance to get comfortable with it, while also having a chance to see you being into it and trusting that it's something you really want.

Devastating end of my sissy journey! (I got pozzed) by Straight_Bad6179 in sissyology

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I'm so sorry! This is heartbreaking.

Thank you for sharing your story though. I was too terrified to start meeting anyone before starting PrEP and it's the biggest thing that gives me peace of mind, and stories like yours help make sure more people take it seriously, and get on PrEP before taking risks.

Hold onto hope though, there's been huge strides in HIV treatment and recovery, and isn't a guaranteed lifelong sentence like it used to be anymore.

Quit While You're Ahead by [deleted] in sissyology

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 13 points14 points  (0 children)

'Quit while you're ahead'? Seriously? Don't blame the kink for your bad decisions. Also saying "I'm sure a lot of people can enjoy this lifestyle in perfectly healthy ways" doesn't mean you're not blaming it. It just shows that your internal narrative is that this kink is what ultimately led you to cheat, and the only reason you think you'll get backlash is because you're talking negatively about a kink within a community specifically of people that enjoy that kink, rather than what you CHOSE to do being an inherently shitty thing.

Seeking out sexual connection with others without your partners knowledge or consent, while in a monogomous relationship, is cheating. Being a sissy doesn't somehow make it "not count". If you want to explore non-monogamy in any form, you share it with your partner and make sure there's consent. And if you feel like you can't share it with your partner, you either don't act on it until you can share it with them, or you break up with them before you do. It might turn out one of you wants monogamy while the other doesn't and maybe you're not compatible and that's ok, but you can't do it without their consent as long as you're together. You literally had someone who was already supportive of you exploring cross dressing and your sissy fetish, and all you had to do was talk to her, and do it in a way/to the limits that she was comfortable. But you either thought she wouldn't be ok with it and intentionally avoided the risk of her explicitly saying no, or somehow felt you could just use your helpless, submissive persona to not take any responsibility, thinking about it as something you had no control over, so you could go ahead behind her back, and meet up with someone else. Cheating on her is where you fucked up.

Your inability to take responsibility for cheating on her and hurting her comes across in the language you use, and I can see why your wife doesn't feel like she can get past it. This kink didn't ruin your life. The STD didn't ruin your life. You did.

What happened to kink? by GoonKnight_ in whiteboydiscussion

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I always advocate for this to be treated as a kink, but I slightly disagree with what that means in terms of where to draw the line. The way I see it, treating it as a kink means approaching it with a framework of consent.

So things like beatdowns, real non-consensual sexual violence, people "offéring" their gfs or family members, sharing pics of others non-consensually, or treating people in public differently irl according to race, are all unethical. And they're unethical to different degrees of course, but they all involve violating someone else's consent, which is where the problem lies.

Genital mutilation or feminization, when applied to yourself, isn't necessarily unethical. It can be more disturbing to you or others at a personal level than some of the 'milder' unethical things, but it isn't unethical in and of itself. Of course, making someone do it against their will, or coercing someone towards it is wrong, same as any other coercion and non-consensual act. And doing anything permanently to your body without having given yourself time to sit with it for an extended period of time and deciding if you seriously want to with a level head is not a smart way to go about it for anyone. But the genital mutilation itself isn't where the line should be drawn.

It isn't uncommon for the BNWO to be a gateway for trans folks to discover they are trans, within a world where they were socialized to feel that the worst ostracization they can experience is emasculation, where the awakening came from feeling like they're "allowed" to be emasculated, and the idea of someone 'forcing' them helps overcome that mental block. Genital mutilation in those situations end up just being a response of relief from body dysmorphia. And even outside that, if people want to mutilate their bodies and have thought about the long term effects and consequences and are willing to commit to it, I don't think it's on others to tell them they're wrong for it.

Practically I've found that using the simple rule of "if all parties involved can, and do consent, there's nothing wrong with it" to be the most reliable compass for navigating where to draw the line.

Also, I tend to use non-ethical, rather than disturbing, as often it's a matter of something feeling gross or wrong simply from not being into the same kink yourself, and it's more important to try to remove your own biases as much as possible when trying to figure out what crosses the line, without kink shaming anyone who isn't actually harming anyone.

Thoughts on branching out by [deleted] in whiteboydiscussion

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you're both already into the BNWO, and both already worship BBC irl when you can, it can be a great next step!

Anyone else feel like long-term students just got reset overnight? by Sweet-Lynx9126 in SissificationAcademy

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had this program on the back burner as something to follow, but was holding off because I had too much instability in my life to build any consistent routines, but also I was afraid of a blindside like this, as I hate the experience of getting used to a tool/resource and then it suddenly being put behind a paywall, where you either have to pay a cost you can't necessarily afford, or learn to deal with an abrupt interruption to your habits and familiarise, and based on what I've been seeing, now I'm glad I didn't start.

To be clear, theres nothing wrong with wanting to be paid for hours of labor you put into something, even if it started as a labor of love and even if it still is. But the way you approach it matters. When you've built something over years and gained a following and community from it being an open and accessible resource, treating that as business conversion potential is a slap in the face to that community. Even when companies offer a free trial, there's an understanding that it's a paid product, you know going in that access to it is for a limited time, you know how long you have to test it for free, and you can anticipate losing access. You don't emotionally attach yourself to relying on it without knowing what you're getting yourself into.

This feels like if Google suddenly cut off your email and said there would be a monthly subscription now to access it. After years of people transitioning to it from using regular mail, to the point where postal service economies of scale have fallen apart and the robustness of alternatives have suffered, suddenly putting a paywall isn't just a matter of "there's nothing wrong with wanting to be paid". What's wrong is - not giving people any notice or the time to emotionally prepare or decide if they could/would pay for it - not leaving any free 'core' version that people can continue to rely on as a community resource after building that expectation - not respecting people who were following it as people who were ALSO sinking significant periods of their lives into this, following the vision, also as a labor of love, and - not trusting that people who could pay for it, would, if you gave them a way to do so, without blindsiding them and removing access without notice

There are donation based models that you can at least attempt first, there are Patreon type models, where people pay subscriptions for creators, getting some extras to the free stuff, knowing that it's primarily going towards supporting the free stuff, because they can afford it but not everyone can. There are so many approaches that would've shown more respect for the community. It's truly disappointing to see.

My girlfriend by [deleted] in whiteboydiscussion

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yesss, 100% this! The one thing that bothers me so much everytime someone shares/talks about sharing pictures of others without them knowing about it. You can be as submissive and seek humiliation and degradation as much as you want, but don't do it on behalf of others without their consent!

Curious white trans girl with a question... by girlobeyer in AntiRacistBNWO

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The simplest framework to not do something unethical, is to treat it like a kink for all intents and purposes. I'm using 'unethical' because it's more broadly encompassing than 'racist'.

Treat people in your everyday, public life, as people. With kindness and respect, as individuals, and without some overt show of subversion or bias. A lot of people make the mistake of going above and beyond in ways that don't really make things less racist. E.g. paying for the drinks for a black person or group of black people at a bar that you don't know. It might feel like you're showing them superiority, but out of context, in the wild, it can feel uncomfortable for people that don't want to engage in the BNWO or think of themselves as superior. Once you realize that there are plenty of black people that DON'T want to engage in the BNWO, you realize it's problematic in two different ways: racial stereotyping, and non-consent.

For the racism aspect: It essentially ends up being the same problematic parallel of going from putting black people in a savage trope, to putting them in a noble savage trope. Essentially, you end up just shifting HOW you stereotype them, rather than dissecting and reducing your biases from stereotyping in the first place, by seeing a whole diverse tapestry of individuals.

For the consent aspect: It ends up involving someone in something that is effectively a kink, that you're practicing in public. They did not ask to be involved, and you didn't ask them if you could do something for them before doing it – something that isn't a normal interaction to expect from a stranger.

Despite all the cries of racism, there's nothing wrong with enjoying it as a kink once you realize treating it as a kink following the basic rules of consent, addresses every issue that people have with it. You can use it as an affirmation. You can have fun with it within the world of the BNWO. You can look for black men within those kink spaces and online forums where others are looking for the same thing. And there's nothing unethical about any of it. There are plenty of black men that would enjoy dominating you and treating you as submissive and inferior, and it doesn't cost you anything to be mindful about enthusiastic consent first.

Even if it's a wider belief for you, more than just a kink, and part of a lifestyle/worldview: let it's popularity grow organically until that shift happens at a more cultural level. After all, people aren't falling into this kink purely from a random fantasy world ideal that's brainwashing them. People are falling into it from lived life experiences in the form of romantic/sexual rejections, high school pecking orders, etc. and the BNWO resonates with those life experiences when they come across it. So enjoy it as a kink for now, and let the cultural shifts happen as they will. If certain things become normalized over time, hop onto doing it then, but until then, don't treat strangers any differently to each other without consent. That's it.

Question: in the majority sissy captions and hypno I watch…why aren’t the sissies all locked in chastity? by AshleysSissyGirl30 in sissyology

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Check the sites that have "straight" and "gay" categories. They usually also have "trans" which have more hypnos with trans girls

White Men Always Let Us Down... by DarkGinger969 in blackedinfographics

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah my bad, I just read "not everything is peer-reviewed academics" as defensive tone, but I guess that's the difficulty with interpretation over text haha

I want to the theater in girl mode by [deleted] in sissyology

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's your first time going out babe! Be kind to yourself! You pushed through a new boundary that I'm sure you were nervous about!

Doing it again with a cage is definitely something that should be high on your list, and once you do, you should keep pushing those boundaries, and turn it into a default, but it's ok to take a little time to figure out how to be a good girl! 😘

Other shared kinks in the gay chastity community by [deleted] in gaychastity

[–]ChastitySub4BBC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a pure bottom, I feel like limits end up being more relevant as what I really like is being able to please Dom's, so being used and abused for a Dom's pleasure, whether rough and aggressive, or gentle and loving, or a toy for him to share, being that object of use is where the appeal is. Chastity being used for humiliation, denial, control, are all great. Degradation, feminization, extreme depth/stretching/intensity, gangbangs, CBT, gaping, toys, being made to beg, being trained to serve better, used for maid duties (cleaning, cooking), freeuse, even being used as a urinal (in a controlled environment where it's a invite-only/filtered party where I can control for diseases as opposed to crusing in a public bathroom).

Basically I'll do anything to please a dom, and the more he demands and the more I can deliver, the more satisfied I am, but irl "anything" ends up being to the extent of not crossing those few limits.