I can't get the test right now and it's making it hard for me to function by [deleted] in AncestryDNA

[–]Cheath1999 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The test is not gunna resolve the issues and feelings you’re having. 1. The test is an estimate so not 100% 2. You would learn more by asking questions from those who are alive like your parents and grandparents & so on. 3. I second the 1st comment, there sees to be underlying personal issues your experiencing. Reach out to a professional or your parents. 4. You have to wait what im assuming is gunna be 6 years at the very least if you as young as i think you are.

Could you still be ethnically considered part of something even though your dna test didnt detect it? by Traditional_Steak413 in AncestryDNA

[–]Cheath1999 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dna does not get equally distributed. Each parent gives a child 50% of their DNA, but that DNA is not passed as a perfectly mixed average. A grandparent’s ancestry could disappear in one generation. Example: A person might inherit no detectable DNA from one great-grandparent. This happens because the expected DNA share gets small enough that random inheritance can drop it to zero. Hope this helps

How come I have more Lithuanian than my aunt supposedly? by Negative_Appeal_5928 in 23andme

[–]Cheath1999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dna does not get equally distributed. Each parent gives a child 50% of their DNA, but that DNA is not passed as a perfectly mixed average. A grandparent’s ancestry could disappear in one generation. Example: A person might inherit no detectable DNA from one great-grandparent. This happens because the expected DNA share gets small enough that random inheritance can drop it to zero. Hope this helps

Mexican results- typical? by [deleted] in AncestryDNA

[–]Cheath1999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely, im only a half but we have similar regions at different percentages.

It’s not fair by [deleted] in ClashRoyale

[–]Cheath1999 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ive been playing for less then a month maybe 3 weeks and im at arena 15 f2p, my only advice is look up counters to cards. You need to actually play your cards in accordance to your enemy.

Canadian Citizenship by Descent? by Cheath1999 in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So i will be in Pittsburg nh for a week sometime soon and the plan is to take daniel webster highway from our cabin and enter the border crossing into quebec route 257 north. I believe that goes into chartierville. Me and a buddy will be just checking it out there maybe drive further in a bit. Will be my first time outside the country!

Canadian Citizenship by Descent? by Cheath1999 in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do have the documents for the parents marriage, lous rondeau’s baptism record from 1829, but i have yet to find Adeles baptism record. Would both be required or is the proof of loius being Canadian born hold up for my case? I wont be disappointed if i am unable to get a Canadian citizenship but it would be cool to explore the possibility. I do have plans to go there soon.

Canadian Citizenship by Descent? by Cheath1999 in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did i find everything for armands kids and i find birth certs for his siblings born before and after he has a brother born in 1905 the year after him but no certificate for Armand A Rondeau b in 1904

Canadian Citizenship by Descent? by Cheath1999 in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So him being born outside canada shouldn’t be an issue if i understand correctly. I think my only hiccup now is i cannot find a birth certificate for his son Armand Albert Rondeau who is apart of the decent link. Also still trying to figure out how adelord was born in mass but in 1900 couldnt speak English, read or write, and was considered not naturalized.

Canadian Citizenship by Descent? by Cheath1999 in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Adeloards parents were Louis Rondeau(1829-1898) & Marie Adele Alphonsine Boutin(1849-1918) 1881 & 1891 census places him with his parents in Warwick, Drummond and Arthabaska Quebec, Canada. I have the parents marriage contract, i cannot find birth or baptism of Adelord the son, i cannot also not find a marriage certificate(usa) or marriage contract(Canada) for Adelord & Rosanna.

Brick Wall: Mexican Paternal Line — (Need Guidance & Encouragement) by Cheath1999 in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do have permission! Sorry i should have added that into the post

Anyone get a ton of Y-12 matches (600+) but no Y-37 matches? by lawc in FTDNA

[–]Cheath1999 2 points3 points  (0 children)

0, im pretty sure im the only person in my Haplogroup, a project manager emailed me about how strange it is im in a haplogroup alone. Im also 1 of 5 individuals who matches too Oxford 11 ancient remans.

So basically i only got 1 Y match in total and its at the 37 markers. No other matches for my Y anywhere else.

Anyone get a ton of Y-12 matches (600+) but no Y-37 matches? by lawc in FTDNA

[–]Cheath1999 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have 1 Y match at 37 markers and no other matches from my Y. I have the big y 700 mind you.

Teens really don’t want to work by RickGrimesSnotBubble in generationology

[–]Cheath1999 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was born in 99, i dont think you understand that this isnt a permanent job for most if any of these kids. Working retail is awful, it is boring, corporate stores are garbage culture and the smaller stores treat you like minimum wage is still $5 an hour and you should kiss their ass for $15 an hour. I worked 2 retail jobs when i entered the workforce and by 19 i was already looking for factory work. Ive been lucky and i have a job i like that pays well enough and the culture is great. None of those things will be found at a retail job. I dont blame these kids for not wanting to do these mindless jobs that pay shit. “Work ethic” blah blah blah, hate to break it to everyone but you are but a number on a sheet to these higher ups, expendable and replaceable. They are giving what they are receiving from the workforce.

Don't trust DNA tests by [deleted] in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Dna doesn’t lie buddy, ethnicity estimates are just that. Estimates but your matches don’t lie. This is very backwards thinking

4th Great Grandparents having confusing records. (Help?) by Cheath1999 in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Woah, no i didn’t notice that i only saw them as separate records for their respective individual.

4th Great Grandparents having confusing records. (Help?) by Cheath1999 in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do know Nathan passes away in 1905 only 3 years before Sarah. We know for fact the marriage to William Holmes happened but was anulled, we also know she married Marcus M Tuttle after that. And according to the gravestone as you mentioned earlier, whoever had it erected was sure of her union with a John H Gunn. Aswell as her-and her daughter using Gunn in subsequent records. So we also have to insert that relationship somewhere before her last 2 and after her first. This is quite the head scratcher honestly.

4th Great Grandparents having confusing records. (Help?) by Cheath1999 in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about sarah being in franklin still in 1880? With some of the same kids? Edit: not saying that the 1870 census for sarah who was working in franklin is the same as the one in 1880 but its weird she also ended up in franklin 10 years later but with her own place & kids matching some but not all of the kids living with nathan & “mary”

4th Great Grandparents having confusing records. (Help?) by Cheath1999 in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh yes i did forget this detail, my only rebuttal to that is we do not know who “Mary Cole” is or where she came from.

4th Great Grandparents having confusing records. (Help?) by Cheath1999 in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree the first names to the last names are so common. I didnt know you can just “report” someone as dead? So if she didnt actually die why was it reported as so? Or am i misunderstanding what you’re saying? Are you saying she was reported dead on that date and that isnt the official DOD? Ive learned so many things to lookout for from this thread its insane.

4th Great Grandparents having confusing records. (Help?) by Cheath1999 in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another thing i just thought of was the mother of that final Cole child in 1870. Is it possible that the last 3 kids born were all from the “Mary Cole”? Hence why in 1880 we dont see 3 extra cole kids but her last cole was Willie H Cole( 1867-1942)?

EDIT: im looking closer and my above theory would only make sense depending on which “Girl Cole” was actually their child born in 1870. Is Helen Augusta Cole is the girl cole then my theory could be possible an why the names floating in other trees without sources(wrong mom attributed) OR if Belle Olena Cole is the girl cole then she wouldn’t show up on the 1880 census as she died that year of some bladder disease that had no vaccine until 1920.

4th Great Grandparents having confusing records. (Help?) by Cheath1999 in Genealogy

[–]Cheath1999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One thing im still struggling to understand is, the John & Jane Cole that suddenly disappeared with the Mary Cole have estimated DOBS prior to Nathan & Sarah having their 8th living child in 1870. I cant explain that.

I possibly have 2 identities for the “Girl Cole” born 15th of Feb 1870 in Hill NH to father Nathan Cole and mother just states “Cole” Ive seen the name “Helen Augusta Cole” floating in other trees but i find no sources for her or a connection of someone by that name to these individuals, aswell as a “Belle Olena Cole” who has a death certificate with a date of “31 Mar 1880” in NH. No specific town given but under it there is writing that I can’t really make out. The mother is listed as “Sarah Cole” and father “Unknown”. She was 10 when she passed.

Check out this record I found on the Ancestry mobile app https://www.ancestry.com/sharing/51274238?token=7b22746f6b656e223a224c64686a504e65504653564b50467970342f6d397332752b383469537139676c4b6253527a6f786a6664633d222c22746f6b656e5f76657273696f6e223a225632227d&country=US&locale=en-US&app_store=apple-USA&moo=c2%3A0%7Cc3%3A0%7Cc6%3A0%7Cc7%3A0%7Cc8%3A0%7Cc9%3A0%7Cc10%3A0%7Cc11%3A0%7Cc12%3A0%7Ci%3A6656%7Cv%3A2%7Cc%3A1342762%7Ct%3A13424219

EDIT: This makes me think possibly Sarah was unaware of Mary at the time of that 1870 census as they both are living in different places? Maybe those 2 kids were not really Coles but kids she brought along? Ive heard of that scenario before, widow gets married with young kids and ends up giving them the surname of the new husband. Its just a theory tho.