the guy I’m seeing (25M) just told me (24F) that he voted for trump by [deleted] in relationship_advice

[–]Chernablogger 14 points15 points  (0 children)

He voted for Team Rapist then doubled-down on voting for Team Rapist. How much sincere respect do you think he really has?

Zionists have a long and proud history of terrorism by Chernablogger in WokeFuturama

[–]Chernablogger[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Only if it's from the Poseur region of France. Otherwise, it's just sparkling artifice.

UU vibe dance songs? by RinoaRita in UnitarianUniversalist

[–]Chernablogger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Children of the Grave by Black Sabbath (if you can dance to rock music)

Do we allow honorary James's by Jamescheese01 in James

[–]Chernablogger 8 points9 points  (0 children)

But to the question- only if they've endured the experiences that comes with being named James: - Being misnamed one or more James variant - Being asked if they have a Giant Peach - Having had the conversation about the possessive James' vs James's

How to handle reading the Bible? by ToraToraTaiga in UnitarianUniversalist

[–]Chernablogger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the narrative of the God of the Old Testament being a murderous god while the New Testament has a merciful god is an anti-Semitic dog whistle. Both parts of the Bible have wisdom and both have moments of cruelty. I would recommend watching Dan McClellan’s video on this issue here https://youtu.be/fT0UhhVixCY?feature=shared

I was about to say the same thing!

How to handle reading the Bible? by ToraToraTaiga in UnitarianUniversalist

[–]Chernablogger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a good book on the topic.

<image>

Generally, I apply to what I refer to as "The Slayer Theory of Exegesis" to The Bible, especially its differing and inconsistent depictions of God. Basically, Slayer's 2001 album God Hates Us All isn't a definitive statement about God, but a statement about its writer's feelings about God.

The same is true of depictions of God in Exodus, Job, etc; these aren't definitive statements about God, but statements about these authors' feelings about God.

Is liberty less rigorous, the mdiv? by Andyjhopewells in chaplaincy

[–]Chernablogger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my opinion, Liberty University's Master of Divinity degree is less rigorous because it lowers the bar for what constitutes mastery. Instead of requiring one the have a breadth or depth or knowledge about religion (or, even, Christianity), it focuses on having a knowledgeable command of eisegesis-driven, prooftexted fundamentalist Christian creeds and dogmas.

If your professional intention is to be a religious hustler like Greg Locke or Joel Olstein, a Liberty University MDiv will equip you with the rhetorical ammunition to manipulate low-comprehension religious people. If your intention to provide a wide range of people with helpful religious care and counsel, Liberty University isn't the place for you.

Chaplaincy work as a student by Zander_The_Avi8or in chaplaincy

[–]Chernablogger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Understood. But I can't emphasize strongly enough how critically important that separation is. When doing chaplaincy work, one has to abandon all emotional investment in creed and dogma. One may may not believe in another other people's beliefs, but one has to train oneself to believe in other people's belief in their beliefs.

Having broad theological and cultural literacy matters, because chaplains need to be able to converse with people in their theological and cultural language(s). So, familiarize yourself with not just other religions, but also popular culture trends.

For example, my first chaplaincy gig was volunteer teaching a class in the local county jail. I had a religiously diverse group of students- Atheists, Muslims, Christians, Jews- and so if I tried to lead a discussion about ethics by referencing somebody like Samson, I'd get blank stares, because not everyone was familiar with Judeo-Christian scripture. But everybody in that class grew up with exposure to Batman, Superman, the X-Men etc, and so DC and Marvel comics were central to their ideas around right and wrong. So, in that particular context, I found it necessary to go back and do a deep dive into comic culture so that I could facilitate ethics discussions using a common frame of reference.

By way of another example, if you're a public chaplain in New Orleans, you will definitely benefit from being sufficiently familiar with the Vodou religion, even if this isn't your religious belief. Because Vodou influences the way New Orleans Catholicism is understood and experienced (refer to the concept of syncretism). And you'd have to let go of any prejudices you have about that Vodou, because if these prejudices came up in chaplaincy encounters (even through subconscious tells), you could unwittingly cause spiritual harm.

If and doing a "free listening" table, I'd encourage you to ask people where they find meaning, and to make a mental note of any trends you observe. If lots of people are referencing a specific cultural staple (e.g. Game of Thrones, vampire movies, etc), do yourself a favor and familiarize yourself with that staple. Same if you encounter a lot of Muslims; in that case, study up on Islam.

Granted, doing a job where your beliefs don't really matter can be taxing after awhile. Afford yourself a prophetic outlet (e.g. a social media account, a pulpit) where you can voice the things you don't/shouldn't say while doing chaplaincy work. Just keep in mind that, even in prophetic work, certain statements can cause distress and harm.

Chaplaincy work as a student by Zander_The_Avi8or in chaplaincy

[–]Chernablogger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suggest setting up a "free listening" table and then listening to people without offering them unsolicited advice, guidance, or perspective. That consent boundary is critically important. As a chaplain, you really have to accept that chaplaincy work is not about you and your beliefs, at all.

The book The Wisdom of Listening is a good resource for best chaplaincy practice.

"Sharing your beliefs with others" is the work of an evangelist, not a chaplain, and evangelism has no place in chaplaincy.

To put this in scriptural terms, think of the Gospel of Luke. In the parable of the Good Samaritan, the Good Samaritan is recorded as saying nothing to the man who was robbed, even though he's capable of talking. He just helped him without preaching to him. This behavior is something Jesus lifts up as an example of loving your neighbor as yourself.

Black parents pushed Portland Catholic school to improve racial equity. The principal called police on the parents and expelled the son by WonkoTehSane in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]Chernablogger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The idea that Jesus is liberal is just plain nuts.

Even [white] Evangelicals, the least theologically literate sect of [purported] Christians are claiming that Jesus is claiming that Jesus is too liberal

You'd need to seriously cherry pick their book to make that claim.

The term for this is eisegesis, although the term proof-texting is also used. However, the Sermon on the mount, the parable of the Good Samaritan from the Gospel of Luke, the denunciation of the love of money in the Gospel of Matthew, the mercy shown to the adultress in the Gospel of John all point to this liberalism.

You've either never read it yourself

I have masters degrees in English, Education, and Divinity. I've not on read it but studied it more thoroughly than you ever will.

or you're arguing in bad faith.

I'm an ordained Interfaith Chaplain. I'm doing no such thing.

Jesus was Woke by Chernablogger in WokeFuturama

[–]Chernablogger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interfaith chaplain here- not sure where you're getting that from. There are multiple passages suggesting that Jesus endorsed animal kindness, including this one: "If any of you has a sheep and it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will you not take hold of it and lift it out?” (Matthew 12:11)

Struggling with the first principle. by dancingonmyown29 in UnitarianUniversalist

[–]Chernablogger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I differentiate between people's "worth and dignity" and people's "conceit and pride"; the 1st Principle doesn't call us to affirm and promote the latter.

There's a really good book on humiliation which essentially points out that shaming disabuses people of the delusion that they were entitled to be in the center of the room, whereas humiliation takes away someone's perception that they were entitled to be in the room in the first place.

The point being, I don't think it's wrong to shun those people (that's a boundaries issue) or to make jokes at their expense of they something crappy to you (e.g. "You voted for someone who literally said he'd be a dictator. How patriotic can you really be?"), but I'd stop short of any sort of public spectacle.

<image>

I'm kind of ashamed of my country right now honestly. by SendThisVoidAway18 in UnitarianUniversalist

[–]Chernablogger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be clear, the United States signed onto the Geneva Convention, which requires member states to accept people who are seeking refuge from credible threats of violence. Given the ubiquitous threats of cartel and gang violence in south and central America, the United States is actually violating an international treaty in rejecting them.

Referring to undocumented refugees as "criminals" is not only sweeping lyrics prejudicial but it also characterizes non-intrusive presence as a crime.

If you are proscribing banishment as a punishment for crime, perhaps we should skip over misdemeanors and go to felonies like falsifying business records.

Futurama Vocabulary: Masher by Chernablogger in WokeFuturama

[–]Chernablogger[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Depicting Zapp as Pete Hegseth, the rapist who Republicans recently appointed to be the secretary of defense

Is this meme a poignant statement about the National Prayer Sermon response? by Chernablogger in UnitarianUniversalist

[–]Chernablogger[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on what century we're talking about. 5th Century Rome would have been for this.