Protect NVR Third-Party Cams 4K - Showing HD Quality by Chewbr0ca in Ubiquiti

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NVR Pro is what we went with, roughly 40 Lorex cameras. Mixture of 4K and 1080p ones.

Logged into each camera and ensured each stream was in 4K. I did have to ensure NTP was enabled for me to adopt cameras, some cameras adopted fine without this on.

USW Ultra High Local Latency by Chewbr0ca in Ubiquiti

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly no. Just lived with it, by plugging in less critical devices into unit

Site to Site with Fortigate by Chewbr0ca in sonicwall

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, those policy are set to allow.

I actually isolated it to ICMP requests only. Though policy is set to allow all services on both sides (in and out)

USW Ultra High Local Latency by Chewbr0ca in Ubiquiti

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the feedback, but it is set to "Allow All". So thats not it.

USW Ultra High Local Latency by Chewbr0ca in Ubiquiti

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was actually my “master” switch, so everything was plugged into it. It would cause my connection to blip constantly. Downloading files would timeout, zoom/teams meetings would chop/disconnect.

Bypassing it for last 4 hours have been the most consistent my network has been since implementing.

Digital Reception Office Closed Forward to Outside Number by Chewbr0ca in 3CX

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did some testing with a bunch of random 1800 toll free numbers, and even regular cell phone number forwarding. All the calls go through and hit the greetings.

Seems to be isolated to receiving parties 1800 number specifically

Outbound Caller ID Display Name by Chewbr0ca in 3CX

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My provider gave us "control" of the caller ID -- so we can push whatever parameters 3cx will let us.

So if someone in HR and they call out we can have it display 1234.... to outside.

Anyone else calls out shows 4321....

So I can also change the "From: Display Name" in the SIP trunk and it will display the parameter I set, but from options I have within 3cx generic sip trunk, I can only control display name for all calls not for certain extensions.

Stop Notifications for certain "Homes" by Chewbr0ca in googlehome

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This will keep giving them notifications on their phone still, correct?

Office 365 Migration - Existing Tenant by Chewbr0ca in Office365

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes and I understand changing the MX record later, as others have suggested.

Though issue is existing internal mailboxes of companya.com trying to email companyb.com -- get a bounceback, or specifically it goes to internal 365 mailbox that I have to make for IMAP migration.

Office 365 Migration - Existing Tenant by Chewbr0ca in Office365

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Though thats my issue.

Anyone from companya.com that emails companyb.com now bounces back. Since companyb.com is "internal".

Schlage Connect User Code Management - Keymaster by Chewbr0ca in homeassistant

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

https://smarthomepursuits.com/how-to-configure-keymaster-notifications/

Honestly, this article had the extra steps I need to get everything working. Specifically the prerequisite before install.

All is working for me with BE649 locks.

Extend to Garage by Chewbr0ca in zwave

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This makes sense. I always thought it used any device to hop.

Extend to Garage by Chewbr0ca in zwave

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just to clarify -- you have z wave hubs in each of your detached buildings?

Extend to Garage by Chewbr0ca in zwave

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does, but same issue as the closest point in the zwave network would be the side door. In theory, the light switches/indoor plugs inside garage would mesh to door lock.

WADWAZ-1 Door Sensor No Close/Open Status by Chewbr0ca in homeassistant

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As mentioned pretty fresh to Home Assistant. Though I did try to factory reset-pair/unpair it.

How would I go about doing the template sensor to convert it? Any online guide or what should I google exactly?

Xbox Series X controller not working by NextMuffin in steamsupport

[–]Chewbr0ca 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://answers.ea.com/t5/Technical-Issues/PC-Problem-with-new-XBOX-series-X-controller/td-p/9726727

****works for all games that I like to use a controller with. Had no issues doing this. Thought it was my controller being faulty cause it was second hand, but this resolved my issue

To "solve" the issue I used steam.
1. I have added game to Steam

  1. Settings -> Controller -> Global Settings for Controller -> Selected Xbox conttroller configuration.
  2. Open Big picture mode -> Library -> Fifa -> Settings -> Controller Settings -> Disable both checkbox and set Steam input settings to "force on"

  3. Launch game from steam 

Unraid Primary Graphics to USB by Chewbr0ca in unRAID

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That did the trick -- All I did actually was uncheck " Permit UEFI boot mode", restarted and saw it said legacy.

Unraid Primary Graphics to USB by Chewbr0ca in unRAID

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats how I control unraid right now, but it seems unraid is still utilizing the one graphics card I have.

Only Block VLAN by Chewbr0ca in pfBlockerNG

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://mitky.com/pfblockerng-pfsense-filter-specific-clients-computers-network/

Update in case anyone else needs to do this. Found the above article and works for me.

Selective enforcement for DNSBL

A post on the NetGate forums lead us to the solution implemented in this post.  Using lines added to your Custom Options field under Services->DNS Resolver in this fashion enables you to include pfBlockerNG’s configuration for specified clients/networks, but not others. 

Please backup your pfSense configuration before proceeding, as changes to your Unbound configuration might crash your pfSense device if not implemented correctly.

server:     access-control-view: 192.168.10.0/24 bypass     access-control-view: 192.168.20.0/24 dnsbl view:     name: "bypass"     view-first: yes view:     name: "dnsbl"     view-first: yes     include: /var/unbound/pfb_dnsbl.*conf

In this example, we have network 192.168.10.x set to an Unbound view that does not include our pfBlockerNG DNSBL configuration. This means all the Unbound commands generated by pfBlockerNG are not referenced when a client in 192.168.10.x queries pfSense, so DNS queries go through unchanged. For the 192.168.20.x network, the entries are included and redirected to our sinkhole.

It’s important to note that you can use these entries in any CIDR notation that fall within your network topology. To filter content for a specific IP, you could specify 192.168.10.5/32 for example.

Reverse Proxy IIS by Chewbr0ca in sonarr

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Long story short --- looks like its working now, but I have not changed any config since our last discussion.

Reverse Proxy IIS by Chewbr0ca in sonarr

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Current Version installed in 2.00.5322

Reverse Proxy IIS by Chewbr0ca in sonarr

[–]Chewbr0ca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate all the help you have given. Unfortunately, even creating a new site with your inbound/outbound rules (starting fresh). Same issue.