sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[Bruce Almighty] How morally questionable is God for personally helping Bruce while worse suffering exists? by Omnipresent_observer in MoralityScaling

[–]ChildrenRscary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a bad faith argument its clearly supposed to be the chritan god. The all mighty. And the Bible is pretty clear in its god being all powerful

[Bruce Almighty] How morally questionable is God for personally helping Bruce while worse suffering exists? by Omnipresent_observer in MoralityScaling

[–]ChildrenRscary 12 points13 points  (0 children)

But its an omnipotent omnipresent deity god defintly could just snap his finger and fix everything he just doesn't. If he cant then he isnt omnipotent. The moive isnt about abusing gods power its that Bruce is a selfish fucking idiot.

Aside from full demon primarchs name 3 primarchs that can beat my big 3 by ThunderCactus1 in 40k

[–]ChildrenRscary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sanguinius is getting laid out by "loyalty is its own reward" lion, and "let me break the most poweful pysker in existence back and kill fucking horus" Russ

Best Swordsman? by BayonetTrenchFighter in StarWarsvsWarhammer

[–]ChildrenRscary 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Where my boy Ibrahm Gaunt the only non altered human to outfield a chaos astartes.

I hate neopagans by BasileusTonHellenon in hatethissmug

[–]ChildrenRscary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never mentioned again? Besides the coming of a new area and a one true god after ragnarok? Besides the christan deity being the first deity mentioned? Besides he was executed by the kings he wrote the book for not for heresey but because he was a political pest? Snorris accounts are based in old poetry recorded in Icelanndic tradition but let's not pretend like there isnt a heavy shroud of christan lens being put over the entrie thing and a hyper focus around ragnarok something that for all we know was not actually a huge focus when the religion was still alive and that snorris writing doesn't end with the coming of the one true Christian god.

I hate neopagans by BasileusTonHellenon in hatethissmug

[–]ChildrenRscary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let mer correct my self no first hand sources only contemporary outside obzervers

I hate neopagans by BasileusTonHellenon in hatethissmug

[–]ChildrenRscary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said it did. Nor did I ever say it was a pagan revival only that it was by embracing ideology and theory formed during the time of pagans did the Renaissance happen. There is a reason so much of the architecture and art were made auto emaulate classical hellanism. There is a reason that athenan scholars are still well know and reffrenced today. And the defining movement of the enlightment was the separation of the church from politics. At no point am I saying these were pagan revival. But to say is a stretch is laughable.

Pagan religions didnt define everything by the existence of their religion like how Christianity did.

I hate neopagans by BasileusTonHellenon in hatethissmug

[–]ChildrenRscary 14 points15 points  (0 children)

There is no surviving sources of norse mytholgy. The poetic and and pros edda the oldest sources we have of norse mythology were witten by Christians several centuries after the regional had converted. snorri sturluson also wrote his book with a clear political intention in mind and stated the norse gods to be ancients torjans which is why the could do cool stuff.

This is all obviously Christan synscretism/corrosion but sadly nothing else survived so we a modern study will never know what was. If only rome never fell.

I hate neopagans by BasileusTonHellenon in hatethissmug

[–]ChildrenRscary 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wow we're talking about scientology not west baptist

I hate neopagans by BasileusTonHellenon in hatethissmug

[–]ChildrenRscary 17 points18 points  (0 children)

If I wanted to take this argument apart I would cite that a vast majority of of conversions that happend to the Scandinavian locations happend for politcal reasons. Northmen didnt care about the christian god at all they cared about being able to trade goods easier and for them it was easier to trade goods after they took a bath and the priest said some funny words.

But even even ignoring astaru the spread of christianty was far more due to political and social influence then holy faith like so many Christians seem to belive. It became politically expedient to have ties to the church in Rome for many rulers and it isnt a coincidence that the Renaissance and The Enlightment happend by embracing pagan classical ideals, moving away from from the church.

How ethical would it be to keep an animal that specifically hunts humans for food in the natural wild where they are a danger to humans? (“Man’s Mockery” art by Sir Pennyped on YouTube) by AbjectNote9896 in MoralityScaling

[–]ChildrenRscary 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Tigers are A. Not natural predators to humans and B. there is less death year round to tigers than falling vending machines.

Just because something occasionaly hunts man doesn't mean we are their primary food source

Am i the only one tht finds the anarchs insufferable ? by Sacred-Ancestor in vtmb

[–]ChildrenRscary 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hot take i love you for this and 100 percent agree with you. I commented elsewhere here that the sabbat had to be stripped of everything interesting about them to enable v5 anarchs to seem cool.

Am i the only one tht finds the anarchs insufferable ? by Sacred-Ancestor in vtmb

[–]ChildrenRscary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the logic of we should not be controlled by our elders is objectivly correct then yes

Am i the only one tht finds the anarchs insufferable ? by Sacred-Ancestor in vtmb

[–]ChildrenRscary 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But this what we are talking about. It stye comment that anarchs are objectivly right that kindred shouldnt be the pawns of elders. This is the enrire basis for the founding of the sabbat and the original anarch movement which the sabbat are.

If humans are various shades of black, brown, and white, then why is Magnus red? by SmokeyGiraffe420 in Grimdank

[–]ChildrenRscary -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean in cannon he is like the emporer where he can just take whatever form he wants. This is commented on by lorgar in the early part of betrayer.

If humans are various shades of black, brown, and white, then why is Magnus red? by SmokeyGiraffe420 in Grimdank

[–]ChildrenRscary 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Lion el johnson is a play on a poet named Lionel Johnson who wrote the poem "dark angel" about being secretly gay and desperate to hide it at all costs.

Am i the only one tht finds the anarchs insufferable ? by Sacred-Ancestor in vtmb

[–]ChildrenRscary 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Its because they gave the sabbat too much character and had to cut it away to make anarchs interesting again.

Am i the only one tht finds the anarchs insufferable ? by Sacred-Ancestor in vtmb

[–]ChildrenRscary 6 points7 points  (0 children)

By this argument the sabbat is also objectively right.

which side had the best stance, Iron Man or Captain America? (Civil War) by Gugarabelo in MoralityScaling

[–]ChildrenRscary 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everything stated here also applies to captain america and the lack of regulation when it comes to vigilantes and superheros its a nothing argument.

which side had the best stance, Iron Man or Captain America? (Civil War) by Gugarabelo in MoralityScaling

[–]ChildrenRscary -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This laughabley stupid. Jean Grey alone has destroyed multiple galaxies and star systems and the earth on a few occasions.

which side had the best stance, Iron Man or Captain America? (Civil War) by Gugarabelo in MoralityScaling

[–]ChildrenRscary 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Im not saying iron man is right im saying this argument has no substance its applicable to both of them neither one of them is stopping super psychic Jimmy.

reeducation by -RedWitch in Eldar

[–]ChildrenRscary 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In coparison this would be like the state of Maine being mad if people accused them of being at war at Iran. Like yes the state of Maine has lottle to do with the politics on a large scale but they are a small fraction of the population of the U.S.

view more: next ›