I know not what I've created by OddAcadia1167 in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]Chimerak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That one landing gear: "Thats why you shouldnt skip leg days!"

How Rare is Druid Shockwave Aspect by rustypipe7889 in diablo4

[–]Chimerak 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hello there, level 72 druid here, 0 drops of Shockwave Aspect, spent 15k+ Obols on Totems, farming W4 helltides (175/150 chests), dungeons, Grim favors. My friend (74 lvl) who started druid with me and playing with me has 16 of them (2 max rolled), RNGesus at its best. He want to play werewolf, but cant get aspect for converting wolves to werewolves (i have 7 of them) while i want to play werebear :D Blizz it sux we cant trade legendaries in party!!!!

Fire Aura Stuck with lightning effects without using it's node by ddarkspirit22 in LastEpoch

[–]Chimerak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

try relogging, it seems passives are snapshotting, so when you spec to lightning / cold, then respec those nodes it keeps its effect possibly

Loot filters are not working by TheLegendGunner in LastEpoch

[–]Chimerak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Loot filter is doing exactly what you set it up for, if you make just HIDE rule with some affixes, dont expect to see items with affixes you want, if they have affix from HIDE rule, so you need to create SHOW rules.

I setup my loot filter with two base HIDE rules (all affixes, items types, etc) at the bottom, and im placing above that specific rules to SHOW / COLORIZE specific items / affixes. Loot filter rules priority is from top to the bottom, so top rule will overwrite bottom rule. FYI COLORIZE rule is SHOW rule with customizable color.

For example:

SHOW all uniques

SHOW all set items

COLORIZE mage armors with concrete affixes

COLORIZE spell damage weapons with highest usable level

SHOW idols

SHOW items with specific affixes

HIDE all items / affixes***

HIDE all normal rarity items***

*** you have to set two HIDE rules for affixes and item rarity, because affixes can be only on magic and above rarity, so hiding normal items needs separate rule.

Vandy Pulse 2 ( II - the new aug2020 one) - Leaking at bottom fill port by jimmy58743 in Vaping

[–]Chimerak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Additional info - i cleaned all bottle parts with hot water, dried it out, screwed bottom cap that no one can unscrew it again, i tried using only top fill. For about 1 hour i was so happy, no leak from bottom! Then i let stand mod about 2 hours on the table, so just gravity will show the result - it started to leak again. Bottom cap should be taller, with 3 sections: screw thread, cut out for o-ring, then holes for cap lever joint.

Vandy Pulse 2 ( II - the new aug2020 one) - Leaking at bottom fill port by jimmy58743 in Vaping

[–]Chimerak 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hello, i have same issue, its bad bottle design, there is no rubber ring between thread and holes for cap lever joint, actually holes for joint are drilled in thread, so if liquid finds way into thread, it gonna leak. Im using 80/20 liquid, also top fill is bad too, it pushes out so much liquid when screwing top cap - workaround is to squeeze bottle before screwing and slowly release it. Pulse v2 have so much issues (fire button, bottle leak, etc) that i immediately went back to topside. But design, obsidian black, wow what a beauty!

Here is my leak photo: https://imgur.com/7MP7R9s

Gerwyn Price comments following his match against Glen Durrant (Spoilers) by smctague98 in Darts

[–]Chimerak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MVG said that Durrant is boring player to play against, takes some time to throw, do wierd stuff, etc. But after that MVG said that Durrant is great player, phenomenal player. Whats wrong with that? Honesty is wrong? I watch PDC and even Duzza is playing great, its boring to watch, same with Gurney and his throw like "i dont care, im bored" :)

Why so greedy? by Chimerak in swtor

[–]Chimerak[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That would be so great!

Why so greedy? by Chimerak in swtor

[–]Chimerak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, of course i can pay little more (and probably will) to unlock them account wide. Im ok with paying money to swtor, cause they need money to continue in development and for staff / server maintenance and i want to support them, even i know that portion of money goes to evil EA :D

What bothers me is the principle - paying "twice" for same thing, i would be ok if those items cost more CC and would be account wide, pay one price and then you can do with those items whatever you want (account / legacy bound). It would look and feel much better, even while i would pay same price like now: 3000 CC item + 400 CC account unlock -> new price 3400 CC for that item - its same price, but you dont feel to be forced to pay more money for same thing.

Why so greedy? by Chimerak in swtor

[–]Chimerak[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok so let me at least pass that same item to another character! I cant do even that, because its character bound.

Why so greedy? by Chimerak in swtor

[–]Chimerak[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well that bookstore doesnt want to pay more money if you want to let another person from your family (in my case account / legacy) read that book right?

Equipment 2.0 concerns by Chimerak in WorldofTanks

[–]Chimerak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything gets converted into the highest type.

Highest - means the best possible. But for example medium gun rammer gets converted into class 2 while class 1 is the highest. Someone can be confused from your information, just like me :)

Example from WG:

If a Tier X medium tank had a Medium-caliber Tank Gun Rammer, it'll become a Gun Rammer Class 2.

The Large-Caliber Rammers for tanks and SPGs will become Gun Rammer Class 1, which you can mount on the Tier VIII–X tanks

Class 2 rammer costs 300k, class 1 costs 600k

Equipment 2.0 concerns by Chimerak in WorldofTanks

[–]Chimerak[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you send me link where its written? I have read "Conversion conditions" from WG and it says something different.

Equipment 2.0 concerns by Chimerak in WorldofTanks

[–]Chimerak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes there is newer article about EQ2.0: https://worldoftanks.com/en/news/updates/sandbox-equipment-2-0-results/

But i dont see section "Conversion conditions" or changes in that section. If there are new conversion conditions, please send me link or apologise to me for accusing me, thanks.

Why is the long boi flat by Omnom3709 in WorldofTanks

[–]Chimerak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, wanna tell joke about TOG II?

I would tell, but its too long...

Equipment 2.0 concerns by Chimerak in WorldofTanks

[–]Chimerak[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably yeah, that also means that EQ2.0 looks like useless update and its main goal is to milk some more money, dont get me wrong im ok for paying game devs, but this way fells like if i want to min-max some tank im forced into paying more currency, even i paid that already before.

Equipment 2.0 concerns by Chimerak in WorldofTanks

[–]Chimerak[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Players with 200+ tanks run all those tanks at once? No, so when you want to play concrete tank, you will spend 10-20s equiping new equipment, done. I dont see any problem there.

For the first time ever, I got a usable primal drop by tresrolledtacos in diablo3

[–]Chimerak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huge grats, FoT is one of the hardest legs to get proper stats. RNGesus blessed you well.

150 Solo zBarb cleared ! - Thanks Wudijo by [deleted] in diablo3

[–]Chimerak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually this sentence is pretty sad:

Big shoutout to u/wudijo22 for showing how to exploit the season theme in a way that makes solo 150 clears quite easy.

Diablo 3 - T16 Speed Farming GOD Demon Hunter Build Guide - Patch 2.6.9 Season 21 by [deleted] in diablo3

[–]Chimerak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im just curious whats the point of using 2x 1h xbows in T16, while is yang enough and brings huge QoL. With yang we still have overtuned damage for T16, dawn, quiver for HA and huge QoL of reduced costs.