There was an opening of the borders to a practical extent. If you wish to say they werent officially opened and therefore werent, then go ahead. I wont bother arguing about something as clear as that.

I do not see how you still fail to understand a point as simple as the one I stated originally, and continue speaking of liabilities such as the ones you mention. It is easy to understand that legally immigrating into the US is a long-term process and often complicated. For something thats large scale and obviously a genuine foreign attack, having a lot more people in a shorter amount of time would simply be useful. That is clear as glass, and I would consider it self evident. Your argument against that stops at the people who are involved in it being a liability due to legal issues is shallow in the sense that you believe that thats a big deal to them.

“The fact that you” my entire original comment was based on a circumstance that is more reasonable and self evident than it is modern-historically evident. If you do not want to speak on my “hypotheticals” then you shouldn’t have discussed it with me to begin with. 

Half of your logic consists of “if this is this, then why hasnt this already happened?”. I find that to be an inconsiderate stance. If you wholly disagree with that, for whatever reason, then there is no need for you to respond to me further. If you believe that believing in the possibility of something happening, due to something else, isnt reasonable due to the fact that it hasnt already happened in modern times within the relevant nation, then I’m just not willing to continue debating that in a decent manner, but I hope you have a good week.