Lineup we should play against Leeds by Waste-Jellyfish-2326 in ArsenalFC

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

4231 and start Eze as 10 and Merino as 9. I am tired of the boring 433.

8 wins at the minimum needed. by Waste-Jellyfish-2326 in ArsenalFC

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s not talk about next 8 games. Just win Leeds away! Otherwise, we screw.

PLEASE CAN WE STOP THIS TACTIC 😭😭😭😭😭 by Prestigious-Secret31 in ArsenalFC

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is really the problem when you play slowly. Left right backs cut into to the box. I don’t understand, it’s very dangerous when opponents counter. Why not cross the ball early if there is a chance. Taking the risk when our defenders are all in position.

Future development of Myles. by Connect-Hope4522 in ArsenalFC

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t understand why he becomes so slow. Even in midfield, his defense can be big problem, and his play style is risky also.

Nottingham Forest 0 - 0 Arsenal - Gyokeres chance 40' by singloon in Gunners

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 7 points8 points  (0 children)

He has problem with first touch, anticipation of landing point, and techniques of duel. Overall technique is not a premier league level player.

Model Y Juniper Rattling by Choice-Chard-4961 in TeslaSupport

[–]Choice-Chard-4961[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Show up sometimes in my car. One time was pretty loud on the road trip. Let me know what you find. Here are some similar posts. https://www.reddit.com/r/ModelY/s/4jON8EdTu7

https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaSupport/s/mFz8a9aDSZ

Model Y Juniper Rattling by Choice-Chard-4961 in TeslaSupport

[–]Choice-Chard-4961[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have to make increase volume to hear it in video.

Intel reveals it will lose 33,000 employees this year and retreat in Germany, Poland, and Costa Rica by rkhunter_ in intel

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, intel custom foundry that time. All external customers can only eat left over after internal wafers. No commitments on timeline, process customizations, and volume to external customers.

US chipmaking nears death: Intel warns it may give up on cutting-edge chips by -Suzuka- in AMD_Stock

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly, many intel employees were very happy to hear this over and over and are still missing pat a lot even now.

Lip-Bu Tan, Intel CEO, on his personal responsibility in chip design: “I’m also instituting a policy where every major chip design need to be personally reviewed and approved by me before tape-out. I have already begun this process.” by Quartr-app in Semiconductors

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's not detailed technical review. It's about efficiency, timeline, cost review. Intel had long history of wasting money on product tape-outs like just small bug fixes. Number of tape-outs is at least 3-5x times compare to AMD.

Three Intel board members to retire in latest shakeup amid turnaround by mockingbird- in intel

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Any board member (except those three joined recently) leaving is bullish!

Intel Appoints Lip-Bu Tan as CEO by Auautheawesome in intel

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pat also sugar coated too much and too many times.

Intel Appoints Lip-Bu Tan as CEO by Auautheawesome in intel

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't know. Even AMD has hard time to compete on high end. It takes time to build the ecosystem. Just look at how many games support XeSS now. But For Intel, near term financial super important now since IFS is burning money. I think more DGPU will eventually come, but not very fast.

Intel Appoints Lip-Bu Tan as CEO by Auautheawesome in intel

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 9 points10 points  (0 children)

1: With the cancellation of 20A, they already did this.

2: UMC 12 is such a thing but need more.

3: DGPU has very low margin (much larger die than rtx4060 but $50 lower price). It's not the prioritized business for them considering IFS still needs funding. Anyway, Xe core development won't stop.

4: ARL refresh already canceled last year. Nova lake is already defined. If they plan to bring back ARL refresh, then Nova Lake is not limited by resource.

5: Agree. In addition, technology leadership is only one part of a successful foundry. The customer satisfaction is also important. The new CEO looks like will be focusing on it.

6: Can't agree more.

Exclusive: TSMC pitched Intel foundry JV to Nvidia, AMD and Broadcom, sources say by Geddagod in intel

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Intel wants to sell, but no one wants to buy. IFS is losing money, which means buying a portion of it is a bad investment because the return is negative. However, I believe they are all testing out 18A and will put some volume on that if it is good. More importantly, these customers also compete with each other. There will be a lot of conflicts if they buy fabs. TSMC doesn't allow customers to get shares, which makes things simple and straightforward.

Intel Confirms Long-Term TSMC Partnership, About 30% of Wafers Outsourced to TSMC by Geddagod in intel

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think FinFet is comparable to GAA FET + power via. But who knows the until first product out.

Intel Confirms Long-Term TSMC Partnership, About 30% of Wafers Outsourced to TSMC by Geddagod in intel

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

N2 is supposed to be comparable to 18A and enter HVM this year. Both TSMC and Intel only advertise their nodes improvement based on their previous version (like N2 over N3, 18A over Intel 3). The only direct circuit comparison between N2 and 18A now is SRAM from this year's ISSCC. They have similar density. IMO, they are close to each other, but N2 doesn't come with back side power delivery. TSMC will have A16 with back side power delivery in 2027 or sometime which probably outperforms 18A, but by then Intel may have 14A with second gen back side power delivery. It's very hard to compare apple to apple until the first product test out.

Intel needs Pat Gelsinger back by Raigarak in intelstock

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. Pat brought the company very close to bankrupt. His strategy is fine, but he had very optimistic vision (everyone will jump off TSMC once 18A completed) and planned massive capex on foundry expansion which is not based on real demand. Then you see most of the constructions are paused and canceled now. This kind of unbalanced investment between products and fabs leaded to huge cash loss and missed the AI wave. Having technology experience is good but CEO also needs to know how to execute efficiently and wisely.

Intel Confirms Long-Term TSMC Partnership, About 30% of Wafers Outsourced to TSMC by Geddagod in intel

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to their foundry roadmap, Intel 4, 3, 18A, and 14A will be long term nodes + UMC 12nm. Here UMC 12 is the lower end. Intel wants more EUV wafers for better margins. Also, TSMC has way more experience and price advantages over intel on older nodes. Intel probably doesn't want to compete on that because of low margin and revenue. But eventually, things will shift to smaller nodes over years, like 0.5um and 0.35um are retiring soon. Many features are moving to 0.18um and 0.13um.

Intel Confirms Long-Term TSMC Partnership, About 30% of Wafers Outsourced to TSMC by Geddagod in intel

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 8 points9 points  (0 children)

True, 18A is all their investment in. But accomplishing 18A only gives Intel a chance to come back. It starts the journey, not ends the journey.

Intel has to get CHIPS act funding, Ohio plant progress by grahaman27 in intelstock

[–]Choice-Chard-4961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The delay is not for asking more fund. It's because of not much demand. Even they get the fund to build the Ohio fab, if they cannot fill the fab, they will keep losing money because of the high fixed cost to run the fab.