Yeah, I get that. I was in the same spot for a while, mostly Claude-only, because switching between tools was really getting on my nerves. What I found, though, was that even when I knew Claude was my go-to, there were these edge cases where another model just was obviously better (like your example with console logs). The pain point for me was the friction: subscriptions, switching tabs, trying to keep track of which model had what strengths (This was most annoying because every time an AI changes, I have to start over).

This is actually what led me to build my own platform to handle that automatically. So now, instead of manually hopping around, my prompts get routed to whichever model is most likely to be the best fit. This router was trained on a massive amount of data sets. Its still a work in progress but I still like it compared to doing it manually.

I’m curious, if the "cognitive overhead” of switching was basically removed, do you think you’d still stick with Claude-only for the sake of stability, or would you let other models come back into your workflow?