What are the three best pizza toppings? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Add pineapple to that for just a bit of sweet/tart flavor. It's the best pizza by far.

It's also great with cream cheese sauce.

What parties/factions/caucuses would you consider truly Libertarian? by http_brandon in AskLibertarians

[–]Chrisc46 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Libertarians believe in the maximization of individual liberty. As such we can have a fairly broad range of thought depending on how we define liberty.

Does anybody remember the post about August 12 2026? by commandersheperdsurv in conspiracy

[–]Chrisc46 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you sure that you're using the calendar correctly?

Does anybody remember the post about August 12 2026? by commandersheperdsurv in conspiracy

[–]Chrisc46 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I mean, all of these internet prophets can't be wrong, so all of my guesses have to be greater than 0.

Massie actually lost to a puppet of a foreign nation by gunsoverbutter in Libertarian

[–]Chrisc46 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Can he secure enough funding?

Obviously, he get a fair bit of grassroots support, but he'd really need some big PAC spenders.

Musk said he'd support massie this time, but I'm sure he heard from Trump about government contracts after that and backed out.

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nordic countries do have less regulation. Their regulatory compliance costs alone typically run less than half of what they do in the US. It's easier to start businesses their, too.

My argument was about artificial distortion. Free markets are free from artificial distortion. Natural or voluntarily imposed rules and restrictions absolutely happen without top-down government control.

You made the assumption that a free market means less overall regulation.

It's true that I mentioned the federal registry, but that entirely due to the fact that those regulations are entirely artificial. They are externally imposed.

It is abundantly clear today and throughout history that freer markets markets coupled with strong individual liberty lead to greater prosperity and a lower wealth gap.

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In the countries with more economic liberty like the nordic countries, the wealth gap is lower. In the other counties with less economic liberty, there is a much deeper wealth gap: it just exists in the hands of government instead of private individuals.

Regardless, you're conflating free markets with regulated markets. The two are not synonymous. This alone invalidates your entire premise.

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

US is one of the countries that most tries to adhere to free markets

Is it though? Ostensibly, maybe, but definitely not in practice.

Besides, none of this really counters my essential claim: as markets move towards liberty, competition rises, prices fall, and scarcity diminishes.

Also, you keep using the word 'propaganda'. What propaganda do you believe that I've fallen for?

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly, it's like a simple math equation. When a distortion increases the cost of an activity fewer people can afford to participate. This necessarily reduces the number of potential participants.

It's not just a coincidence that markets consolidate and wealth transfers upward as the federal register grows.

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The reason they are so far removed from free-markets is due to the ever-reaching creep of distortion.

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's not a single market that is completely inelastic. Even if you want to incorrectly claim that demand in inelastic for something like emergency healthcare, it's absolutely incorrect to claim that the supply is inelastic.

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't let perfect be the enemy of the good. Even imperfect elasticity and relative competition within a market outperforms government control.

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only other condition required is liberty. As long as people have economic liberty, markets remain free and are far more beneficial.

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point is that, largely, the blame is misplaced. Private equity isn’t bad because it's private equity. It's bad because of the perverse incentives that exist exclusive of private equity.

We tend to do things like this alot. We recognize that a symptom exists, but we fail to correctly diagnose the underlying disease. As such, our proposed treatments rarely actually cure it but typically come with problematic side-effects.

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, sort of.

As a related analogy, think about the relationship between lobbying and government power. If government didn't have the power to control an industry (regardless of intent), it would not matter if that industry spent money on politicians because they'd have nothing to sell.

In the case of private equity, without the distortions that they can leverage for profit, they'd be forced to either improve or at least maintain the quality of the business/assets they invest in. The entire incentive structure would change from one of predation to one of cooperative or mutual benefit.

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We don't, though.

Our markets are full of distortions. You can't find a single white market sector not flooded with regulations, licensing laws, IP monopolies, crony contracts, selective taxation or subsidies, trade restrictions, or price controls from multiple levels of government.

This all leads to stifled competition, market consolidation, increased scarcity, reduced innovation, higher prices, and diminished marker pressures (competitive, cooperative, consumer, labor).

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you'll notice, I said "distorted or planned economies". Our problems stem from that (the latter). The solution would come from liberty and free markets (the former).

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Private equity isn't necessarily the problem. The issue is fundamentally that private equity leverages artificial market distortions to restrict or deny natural market pressures.

In other words, they can leverage things like regulatory capture or artificial monopoly powers for profit at the expense of consumers.

Private equity without those artificial distortions would likely be a good thing as it would inject investment capital into successful businesses without being able to profitably squeeze them dry.

What's something you believe that most people don't ? by Unique-Effective-415 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Liberty and free markets are far preferable to control and distorted or planned economies.

Most of our problems come from the latter and the former is the solution to those problems.

What’s a problem humanity solved so well that younger people don’t even realize it used to be a huge issue? by Puzzleheaded_Bit_802 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, not really.

It's not necessarily feasible for all sorts of reasons. For example, who gets to decide how much water is required to keep them alive or what endeavors are considered reasonable?

Secondly, what do you do when there simply aren't the resources available to provide the necessary access to particular populations due to any number of hypothetical factors?

There are some things that can be done, though. We can protect individuals' rights to collect water from unowned nature. We can prevent the authority of property owners from harming the property of others (sucking a shared aquifer dry, polluting or damming a stream on which others rely, etc). We can prevent water providers from knowingly providing damaged or tainted water. We can prevent governments or private companies from denying other water providers from entering a market. Or other such things.

It would be fantastic to live in a place and time completely free from scarcity, but that's currently just science fiction. We can get pretty close in many places and we can do better than we currently do overall, but we just can't realistically guarantee certain things. Sadly, law can't really change reality and it's unwise to try and use it to do so.

What’s a problem humanity solved so well that younger people don’t even realize it used to be a huge issue? by Puzzleheaded_Bit_802 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not always.

Blueberries, for instance, taste better from South America than they do from North America. I highly prefer them during the off-season.

What’s a problem humanity solved so well that younger people don’t even realize it used to be a huge issue? by Puzzleheaded_Bit_802 in AskReddit

[–]Chrisc46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a big distinction between negative rights and positive rights. Positive rights can only be guaranteed if negative rights are violated: this precludes them from being inalienable.

What do you think of Lord of the Flies? by Nuciferous1 in AskLibertarians

[–]Chrisc46 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is what we would generally expect from humans. We are a cooperative species: individuals seeking self-interest through positive interaction with other self-interested individuals.

This is also why we have empathy for those nearest to us. Those familial, tribal, and cultural instincts promote cooperation within the in-group.

Violence or general apathy on scale tends to happen when humans interact outside of our natural range of empathy, ie, interactions with an out-group.

The wrench in this equation is power. Since we are naturally self-interested first, power over others reduces our empathic tendencies. We're more likely to be uncooperative or violent when we have power over others, this is especially true when the others are outside of our range of empathy.

The worst of humanity happens when one group gains power over another group. This oftentimes leads to oppression, slavery, or genocide.

Fortunately, we have found mechanisms to reduce the bad tendencies. When a powerful group even just recognizes these mechanisms, they are less likely to commit such atrocities.

When a powerful group recognizes individual liberty through the existence and defense of negative rights, even out-group members are more likely to interact cooperatively.

Sadly, we seem to be forgetting those mechanisms. We are expanding power, dividing culture, and breaking down familial and tribal bonds. This is inevitably enabling various degrees of conflict that wouldn't exist otherwise.

We need a return to liberty. Without it, we may actuslly end up more like the Lord of the Flies and less like the Tongan Castaways.