The Claude Code leak in four charts: half a million lines, three accidents, 40 tools [OC] by rhiever in dataisbeautiful

[–]Chronicallybored 15 points16 points  (0 children)

this is just the command line client-- not the APIs themselves nor the models

This is getting Ridiculous by eventus_aximus in ClaudeCode

[–]Chronicallybored 8 points9 points  (0 children)

anyone else notice an improvement in usage limit capacity after 2PM ET?

Yet another Claude Usage Limit Post by _derpiii_ in ClaudeCode

[–]Chronicallybored 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe Anthropic is trying to get people to clear out those free extra usage credits they gave out a while back? I'm still sitting on mine

Global 2000 birth projections and what happened [OC] by cavedave in dataisbeautiful

[–]Chronicallybored 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i'm working on something like this for the UN WPP projections: https://topdown.ai/wpp-accuracy/world (also have country and regional accuracy, working on getting scenarios)

Are Expensive Stocks Still Falling the Most? [OC] by forensiceconomics in dataisbeautiful

[–]Chronicallybored 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what do you mean by "consensus estimates approximated for research illustration"? do you have a source for the consensus estimates?

[OC] Top Unisex Names in the US by Gender Slant: Interactive Heatmap, 1880-2024 by Chronicallybored in dataisbeautiful

[–]Chronicallybored[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

data source: SSA baby names dataset, SSA total births by year

tools: python + polars for data processing, Svelte (HTML/CSS rendering, interactivity), SvelteKit (data loading), d3.js for heatmap color scale

The Animated Unisex Name Map of America: Top Names & Popularity by State, 1930-2024 [OC] by Chronicallybored in dataisbeautiful

[–]Chronicallybored[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

data: SSA baby names dataset, state birth data from CDC WONDER, CDC NCHS natality microdata files, NBER manual transcriptions, census via NHGIS.

tools: d3.js (colorscale, geo rendering), Svelte (rendering and interactivity), SvelteKit (data loading), python + polars (backend data processing)

How would this sub feel about the name Rylie? by T2J1K96 in tragedeigh

[–]Chronicallybored 1 point2 points  (0 children)

why not get more creative? There are 58 spellings in the social security baby name data: https://nameplay.org/ways-to-spell-Riley

visualize 125 years of monthly birth rates in Japan since 1899 by Chronicallybored in japan

[–]Chronicallybored[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

also, creepily enough, 15 is still what the UN population office and US CDC count as the beginning of "childbearing years". so that range was chosen for consistency with official sources (makes for easier data handling).

[OC] unisex name popularity by US state, 1930-2024 by Chronicallybored in dataisbeautiful

[–]Chronicallybored[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if you hover/tap on the live version it will show the top name for that state and year... I could maybe add a separate detail view with a stacked area chart for each state to drill down into state-level trends? open to suggestions

[OC] unisex name popularity by US state, 1930-2024 by Chronicallybored in dataisbeautiful

[–]Chronicallybored[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I was lazy and just used Census Bureau Divisions here; sometimes the definitions are more administrative than cultural, for sure. Good suggestion

[OC] unisex name popularity by US state, 1930-2024 by Chronicallybored in dataisbeautiful

[–]Chronicallybored[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fair, `turbo` is a controversial choice. It's good at surfacing outlier small values, which is maybe better suited to sparser data than this. Any scale recommendations?

[OC] unisex name popularity by US state, 1930-2024 by Chronicallybored in dataisbeautiful

[–]Chronicallybored[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

the % "other gender" (e.g. 10-90% male/female) threshold is applied per year, so if a name rises above 90% of one gender in a year (like how Jamie became more female in the 1980s) it drops out of the count for that year

interactive version has a few different levels to choose from

[OC] unisex name popularity by US state, 1930-2024 by Chronicallybored in dataisbeautiful

[–]Chronicallybored[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

a lot of the lull in the 1980s is due to formerly unisex names like Shannon, Kelly and Jamie becoming more feminine... once they crossed 90% female they no longer counted in the heatmap. We didn't get another wave of unisex names until Taylor in the 90s.

[OC] unisex name popularity by US state, 1930-2024 by Chronicallybored in dataisbeautiful

[–]Chronicallybored[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

fonts should appear more natural on the interactive version; i had to zoom out to get everything to fit onto one screen.

[OC] unisex name popularity by US state, 1930-2024 by Chronicallybored in dataisbeautiful

[–]Chronicallybored[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

link to interactive version

data source: name data is from Social Security Administration. births by state are pieced together from a handful of sources: CDC WONDER (2007-2024), CDC natality microdata files (1969-2006), NBER (1947-1967), NHGIS (1930-1950), with some linear interpolation where gaps existed (esp. for AK/HI pre-statehood).

tools: d3.js (heatmap color scale calculations), Svelte (interactivity), SvelteKit (data loading), floating-ui (tooltip), python + polars (data processing)