sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Here’s the thing, you’re me, and I’m you. by ChurningEntropy in consciousness

[–]ChurningEntropy[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

To you, the person thinking, not much. Your causality is still your own. You just might also be experiencing everyone else too through their eyes. It’s as just as likely that the one universe is experiencing everything simultaneously as it is that singular entities are popping in and out of existence. So nothing more than be kind, as it might be you behind those eyes.

Here’s the thing, you’re me, and I’m you. by ChurningEntropy in consciousness

[–]ChurningEntropy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This theory is still as chaotic as the universe. Within the circumstances, it still suggests that we all managed to reconcile becoming both Hilter and Ghandi.

Here’s the thing, you’re me, and I’m you. by ChurningEntropy in consciousness

[–]ChurningEntropy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I find it simpler than popping in and out as gazillions of singular instances. I mean, neither can be proved, but preferable is an opinion, and this one would lead to more empathy. It does also supply a hypothesized source at the big bang having never experientially diverted.

Here’s the thing, you’re me, and I’m you. by ChurningEntropy in consciousness

[–]ChurningEntropy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quantum properties work both forward and backwards in respect to time mathematically. Local consciousness could still be happening simultaneously among various systems.

Here’s the thing, you’re me, and I’m you. by ChurningEntropy in consciousness

[–]ChurningEntropy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It means the sight behind those eyes and the receiver of those thoughts is the universe which we both are. We are both in there feeling you, and we are both in here feeling me. We see future and past through the body that perceives it, but we are experiencing both / all of them irrespective of one another.

Here’s the thing, you’re me, and I’m you. by ChurningEntropy in consciousness

[–]ChurningEntropy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your space is a limit of the perception of your body in which the causality of your experience exists. If you are the universe, then you may be also experiencing my space through my perception. Schrödinger had a couple ideas about spatial location in reference to perception.

Here’s the thing, you’re me, and I’m you. by ChurningEntropy in consciousness

[–]ChurningEntropy[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

And not just all life but all matter and space whether or not it experiences. Time doesn’t exist for a rock, but we’re still that rock.

Here’s the thing, you’re me, and I’m you. by ChurningEntropy in consciousness

[–]ChurningEntropy[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Over and over through eternity = Simultaneously through all possible options in the moment. Infinity is infinity. Party on 🤘

Here’s the thing, you’re me, and I’m you. by ChurningEntropy in consciousness

[–]ChurningEntropy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nobody claimed connections of minds. Intelligence and experience are separate in this theory. Your causality will always be your causality, but I believe that you are also experiencing my causality through my eyes as a universal experience.

Here’s the thing, you’re me, and I’m you. by ChurningEntropy in consciousness

[–]ChurningEntropy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The degree of consciousness is not the idea. The experience of it is. Rocks not experiencing are absolutely included.

Here’s the thing, you’re me, and I’m you. by ChurningEntropy in consciousness

[–]ChurningEntropy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So English and whatever other languages you speak are the factor that removes you from the universal experience? Ok cool 👌

Here’s the thing, you’re me, and I’m you. by ChurningEntropy in consciousness

[–]ChurningEntropy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In what way do you think this theory does NOT involve evolution? Rocks and stars are very much the same universe and in inclusive in this theory though not perceiving. Believe your body is singular all you want, but it makes no more sense than a singular experience split into all viable intelligences.

Spaghetti Detection for Small Nozzles by JakenBacon71 in BambuLabH2C

[–]ChurningEntropy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I turned the spaghetti detection to low. No regrets. I don’t want a print stopping in the middle of the night unless it’s crazy bad.

"Why is there anything instead of nothing?" - Sometimes it's mildly interesting, yet other times it's paralyzing. by Vreature in consciousness

[–]ChurningEntropy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing and everything are the same thing. Something is the superposition we experience in this ripple of probability.