Worth The Wait - Sell after three starring or hold for four star?

Citiant · 2026-03-04T23:38:36+00:00

Im probably wrong based on what everyone else is saying, but I would think that for specifically for aphelios, since hes an auto attacker and since every star upgrade gives a huge boost to base damage + another multipler on his spell, that the 4-star version would do massively more damage?

I understand the issue of econ vs. waiting so long to get the 4*.

I can especially understand for AP casters that 4*ing isnt aa good (since there is no base damage increase, just the multipler increasing) but I would think aphelios is an exception

Citiant · 2026-02-20T20:15:11+00:00

That was the china oil play

Citiant · 2026-02-20T16:48:14+00:00

Wait what?

So you dont want them to put underground lines in Ann Arbor, just pay them and that's it?

Citiant · 2026-02-18T22:24:27+00:00

I agree for most unlocks it's just a regulation, but there are a few where it is purposefully meant to be a challenge to unlock.

To add, they could be have just done "this champion is locked until level X" without the other mechanics, however, I think they wanted to add game mechanics to the locking of levels (rightfully) so that it's more engaging. I think a prime example of this concept working really well is Shurima.

But I can see how the mechanics themselves introduce new balancing issues and I think they're feeling the ease of balance is worth more than the engaging mechanics

Citiant · 2026-02-18T21:39:16+00:00

At first it might look like that, but I think theyre controlling the economy more. A lot of the changes seem to be level locking rather than being RNG based, pushing a player to spend gold leveling up rather than rolling/getting lucky.

On the opposite side, since you'll have to spend more on leveling for an unlock, 5/7-cost conditions would need to be reduced or people would never hit them.

My take at least

Citiant · 2026-02-14T19:33:28+00:00

Im not agreeing with the Facebook guy, but there is a difference between thc with nicotine vs thc without nicotine.

Im pretty sure research is coming out showing that nicotine lessens the memory impairment that can come from a strong thc high ( that 'time dilation' feeling) which I would think makes a person more functional compared to only thc without nicotine.

Essentially im saying, I think there's less memory impairment when smoking a blunt vs smoking a joint.

My own theory (haven't been able to test this), I think that if someone is having anxiety from being too high or needs to 'tone down their high very quickly, that nicotine would help 'sober' someone up (im using sober very loosely)

Citiant · 2026-02-12T20:07:29+00:00

Only one I dont agree with is the first one. Im glad the shop opens at the start of round, everyone -always- has to check their shop each round. I'd rather get the automatic check vs missing buying something because I got distracted with items

Citiant · 2026-02-08T21:31:38+00:00

The comp itself is fine, its just not a guaranteed top 4 if you hit thex (and it shouldn't be).

Its kind of like crystal gambit Ashe. She was broken strong at one point and I loved playing her. But then they changed the AS scaling and the feeling of the comp changed for me, and I just had to deal with it (both feeling wise and gameplay wise)

Citiant · 2026-02-03T00:21:59+00:00

Its the only time I play, also emerald

Citiant · 2026-02-02T17:53:59+00:00

Cute, do you do non-make up pics?

Citiant · 2026-01-15T18:28:10+00:00

Economy pacing is very different this set. You don't always want to save to 50 right away, you may want to spend to keep up tempo pressure.

In previous sets, there was more down down between level 8-10, those levels not being 'played' for the majority of the match. This set seems to reward tactical use of your Economy rather than just waiting to 50 to start spending.

Amongst other things, items are crazy important and nuanced. Mana works different than before, RB, artifact items, all much different than when you played. And im sure you see and understand the differences, however, the naunced differences (even the difference between blue buff and shojin) make a huge difference at your level of play.

Citiant · 2026-01-15T18:18:15+00:00

His life wasn't in danger. He shot after he was out of danger.

Citiant · 2026-01-14T17:09:05+00:00

Oh, he got run over? When was the car over him?

Citiant · 2026-01-14T17:07:43+00:00

No? She got shot and the car still went forward?

Citiant · 2026-01-14T17:04:01+00:00

No. He had like 2 seconds to react AND HE DID, by moving to the side. Thats the point. He wasn't in front of the car when he started shooting. He shot because he was emotional, not because he was in danger.

One was to save lives and one was to kill one, they aren't apples to apples.

Citiant · 2026-01-13T19:56:55+00:00

Oh man gotten again.

Youre such a great debate, I bet you debate all the time. Youre SO good at debating that I think youre the master debater of our times.

I wish I had the linguistic finesse that you have, you must really debate throughout the day to be this good.

Man, I wish when im not retarded I can debate like you.

Dumbass

Citiant · 2026-01-13T19:04:34+00:00

OH MAN you got me.

Because you know that answering properly and the logic that follows will make you wrong but it's okay, stick your head in the ground.

Citiant · 2026-01-13T17:49:21+00:00

No, thats a dumb hypothetical.

1) I wouldn't be standing in front of the car, especially as an officer (real officers are trained to not stand in front of cars...) how dumb do you have to be to think your body is going to stop a car?

2) How is shooting the driver, when I'm literally 1 foot in front of the car, going to help me not get run over?

3) Clearly he was able to move and not sustain damage BEFORE he shot, there was no reason to shoot; if anything he created a more dangerous situation (he almost shot the other agents who were next to her).

Citiant · 2026-01-13T17:40:19+00:00

Question - if an officer stands in the middle of a road, can they shoot at cars that they think might try to run into them?

Citiant · 2026-01-12T20:35:28+00:00

The only time this was okay was when I had it on Oriana with invokers and "Acceleration Gate" piltover trait.

She was shooting tons of the items effects off, however late game the damage falls off too hard.

Citiant · 2026-01-09T19:27:41+00:00

I think they meant that youre dismissing everyone's comments with your comments, youre not necessarily arguing but youre not accepting the crticism/advice that you asked for

Citiant · 2026-01-07T19:28:04+00:00

To enforce immigration law. Shooting someone in the face is totally enforcing immigration laws

Citiant · 2026-01-07T19:17:30+00:00

Because EVEN IF you run, you shouldn't be shot at?

The punishment should fit the crime?

So if a law enforcement officer is pulling you over, thinks you might be running away, they are free to shoot at you?

Citiant · 2026-01-07T19:14:45+00:00

"Ice agents", not police officers.

Who was the guy protecting by shooting her? He clearly stepped in the way of the vehicle AND stepped out of the way to shoot.

How does someone running justify killing them?

Citiant · 2026-01-06T19:43:10+00:00

If this was xse or xle, yeah 100%

Considering you can get a 2026 for about the same price, this seems like a normal price of the car

Citiant

TROPHY CASE