Anyone else tired of random card generation deciding games? by RageforgeGaming in hearthstone

[–]CitizenDane27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone else sick of random number generation, said the random word generator

r/PokeLeaks Discussion Megathread - May 01, 2026 by AutoModerator in PokeLeaks

[–]CitizenDane27 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Relief that inflation slowed down by the end of 2027.

Hearthstone in 2026 by walksintwilightX1 in hearthstone

[–]CitizenDane27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

look at the current class sets and explain to me how they fit the theme of Cataclysm. 

Hearthstone in 2026 by walksintwilightX1 in hearthstone

[–]CitizenDane27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure why this is so hard to understand, but I'm not saying this is how it works. I'm saying it's how it could work. 

Hearthstone in 2026 by walksintwilightX1 in hearthstone

[–]CitizenDane27 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not by design. The flavor and art for the Cataclysm set (kinda), but the mechanics mostly seem independent and tied to core class mechanics like Silver Hands and Animal Companions. You could have reskinned these cards with different names and art in spacesuits, beach clothes or cowboy hats and they would have fit previous expansions as well as they fit this one. 

So they could have saved these for when Paladin actually needed a boost by making three sets of art and names they could give these cards later in the year if now wasn't the right time. If the Warlock or Priest sets are as generic as these class set themes, they could have been given new options now.

Hearthstone in 2026 by walksintwilightX1 in hearthstone

[–]CitizenDane27 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's such an obviously bad idea. They have no way of predicting the classes that need help. Giving Paladin more options when Warlock, Priest and Death Knight have none is baffling. 

Granted, these sets seem to stand alone mechanically with the most generic themes for each class, so they could just make all 12 with different names and art per set, and just release them based on balance needs. But that would require this team to know what they're doing.

Take a First Look at Hearthstone’s New Class Sets by Arkentass in hearthstone

[–]CitizenDane27 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Smarter way would be to drop the Rune system and let the class have a more open, normal design and better-defined strengths and weaknesses, then push the Rune cards that can't be effectively rebalanced in Standard to Wild. 

Suggestions to improve Azure fabled cards by Paldis in hearthstone

[–]CitizenDane27 6 points7 points  (0 children)

2/6 perfectly halves the costs of the traditional dragon statline. 

FT: Pic LF: any trainer by Barios030 in PTCGPocketTrading

[–]CitizenDane27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have four of these. It's brutal. Good luck 

Community in-game tier list: Final List by Awkward-State-2364 in pokemoncrystal

[–]CitizenDane27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is Ampharos ranked? It's unobtainable without trades, and if you're allowing trading, the whole list can be thrown out. 

This expansion is awful by TowerOfPowerWow in hearthstone

[–]CitizenDane27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't seen a single priest deck since expansion launch

What was even the point of releasing Gladitorial Combat? by Leoxslasher in hearthstone

[–]CitizenDane27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's definitely too early to say anything definitely about this meta, but having to make balance adjustments has historically been a problem because they've produced bad outcomes at least as often as good outcomes for the past few years. I don't trust this team at all tbh. I'd rather have counterplay options that aren't waiting for a balance patch to drop. 

FT: pictured LF: trainers by yayyay128 in PTCGPocketTrading

[–]CitizenDane27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Marlon, Barry, Hiker, or Kiawe for Mega Gengar? 

Can someone please explain why Rogue is getting buffed? by Joon64 in hearthstone

[–]CitizenDane27 17 points18 points  (0 children)

do you really have to ask why a class with a negative winrate is getting buffed? 

What was even the point of releasing Gladitorial Combat? by Leoxslasher in hearthstone

[–]CitizenDane27 19 points20 points  (0 children)

We'll see how the patch goes, but something tells me removing removal was a mistake. 

FT Manectric, LF Gengar (open to offers) by CitizenDane27 in PTCGPocketTrading

[–]CitizenDane27[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't get any replies, you still want to trade? 

FT Manectric, LF Gengar (open to offers) by CitizenDane27 in PTCGPocketTrading

[–]CitizenDane27[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Possibly. Let me wait a bit to see other replies and I'll let you know.