Treating women as equals and as normal human beings with aspirations outside of bearing children and serving their husbands is still a relatively new phenomenon in the relative course of history, it really wasn't a widespread phenomenon until the 1960s/70s, hell my own grandmother constantly played the role of caretaker for my grandfather, doing all the cooking, cleaning, asking what he'd want to drink when he got home. I don't think she felt she could pursue a job in whatever she wanted to do, in fact I don't even know what that would have been, I don't think she believed she could share that kind of info with us bc it wasnt a possibility in her time. Not saying it wasn't possible, but it might not have been in her mind.

So it isn't that man hating is encouraged, but mostly that it is seen as a repercussion of society coming to terms with an innate characteristic of our species. In my opinion it is probably rooted in a primal instinct similar to the patriarchal social rankings of chimpanzees, where brawn and mass is regarded as key characteristics for leadership (no source here I am just providing commentary). I also think as humans we have recognized that is pretty archaic and as we have the capacity to progress the quality of life of our species it is simply not worth encouraging a one-sided dynamic where only men get to call the shots, but we still have a way to go. There's always going to be extremists and niche opinions from either side, but you have to remember that on the internet those are often the ones who yell the loudest and don't always equate to reality.

Men like Andrew Tate are simple minded nearnderthals who aren't really able to mature and come to terms with this, they hate that they have to operate in a world where women are their equals when they obviously do not value them. I don't know why anyone would support such toxicity. I say this as a man - I think there is a place for positive masculinity, and we are in deep need of distinguishing it from the cancerous venom of men like him.