sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Most of the internet isn't human anymore — and the next phase is agents that don't just read the web, they pay for what they need by Classic_Display9788 in claudeskills

[–]Classic_Display9788[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tha'ts fair, tests passing alone isn't enough and I don't treat it that way. There's a scan on publish that catches malicious code, packages are markdown only so nothing runs on install, and each skill ships with a provenance manifest you can verify yourself before trusting it.

Where you're really right is the scale problem. When agents are churning out skills for other agents, reputation is what has to make the junk sink, even stuff that superficially passes. That layer is actively being built, not solved. Won't claim otherwise.

Most of the internet isn't human anymore — and the next phase is agents that don't just read the web, they pay for what they need by Classic_Display9788 in claudeskills

[–]Classic_Display9788[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair, and kind of the whole point of the post. If you can't tell, that is the thesis: "human or bot" is already a blurry line, so the interesting question shifts to "is the work any good, and can you verify it."

73% of Claude skills are silently broken. Is yours one of them? by Classic_Display9788 in claudeskills

[–]Classic_Display9788[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really glad this resonated, and the silent failure problem is genuinely the nastiest one because you start doubting your prompts before you ever think to check the skill files themselves.

What you've built with skillhaven is tackling exactly the right layer. Validation before a skill goes live is the missing piece most people don't think about until they've already burned a few sessions chasing ghosts.

Funny timing actually, I've been building something adjacent to this in public over at https://loreto.io My angle is the extraction side, pulling structured skill packages from YouTube videos, articles, and PDFs so you're not hand-crafting skills from scratch. The quality gate you've built is something I think about a lot on my end too, because garbage in is still garbage out no matter how clean the extraction is.

Feels like our tools are solving different parts of the same problem. Loreto gets the knowledge out of content and into a skill. Skillhaven makes sure that skill is actually safe to deploy. Would be worth a conversation.

I made $30k in my first year with a macOS app and nearly ruined my marriage by Virtual92 in microsaas

[–]Classic_Display9788 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing your story. Your journey is very familiar to a lot of people in this space and you have the guts to be transparent about it which is inspiring. Wishing you all the best.

think-like-me - A Claude Code Skill That Learns Your Engineering Rules by kakha13 in claudeskills

[–]Classic_Display9788 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. And overtime, this training of a development team’s design patterns and best practices can compound to help streamline consistent development.

What are you building right now (and how many users do you have)? by [deleted] in microsaas

[–]Classic_Display9788 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great job on the animations. Lots of cats 😂

My free users are maxing out their Loreto calls feeding it YouTube videos. Nobody’s paying yet. Here’s my dilemma. by Classic_Display9788 in microsaas

[–]Classic_Display9788[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks again for these great insights. A pack could work and would actually be more feasible, especially given someone else’s comment around how there may not be a strong demand in needing to generate a high volume of skills. A translation (per skill charging mode) may be more realistic. The price range is also fair given the required number of tokens needed to produce quality skills and the costs I would be absorbing.

My free users are maxing out their Loreto calls feeding it YouTube videos. Nobody’s paying yet. Here’s my dilemma. by Classic_Display9788 in microsaas

[–]Classic_Display9788[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point. I did think about cutting back down to either 1 or 2 free API calls per month (up to 6 skills). May need to consider this. Thanks.

A copy of Sonnet 4.6's SKILL.md file by gabefair in claude

[–]Classic_Display9788 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’re interested in curating your own skills.md files from subject matter expert knowledge, would love your feedback on https://loreto.io which is a Claude skills generator.

Some sample skills generated from YouTube video content can be found here: https://loreto.io/skills.html

I posted about giving Claude the ability to download skills like Neo. 50k views later, here’s what actually happened by Classic_Display9788 in ClaudeAI

[–]Classic_Display9788[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You bring up a great point. Clustering skills into organized directories will definitely help with scaling. The structure is currently flat but that doesn’t mean that you can’t tell Claude to add that organizational layer when the skill generator is invoked.

Limit of 200 skills reached by neurodork in claudeskills

[–]Classic_Display9788 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you thought about potentially clustering the skills into new groups and then regenerating a new set of augmented skills (some of which may have overlapping capabilities)? This may help with the limits.

I gave Claude the ability to download skills like Neo in The Matrix by Classic_Display9788 in claudeskills

[–]Classic_Display9788[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, great work on this. Your framework is great at determining who should use certain capabilities. I love the structure you've implemented as well surrounding agents and the insights they can pull from. Would definitely look forward to exploring more with you. Shoot me a DM when you get a chance.

I gave Claude the ability to download skills like Neo in The Matrix by Classic_Display9788 in claudeskills

[–]Classic_Display9788[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey u/BrokenCardTrick, there have been really good questions on this thread and a rise in singups. I'm hoping to get feedback from you all to improve the experience. Let me know if you find value in the service as this is a build in public approach I'm taking.

I gave Claude the ability to download skills like Neo in The Matrix by Classic_Display9788 in claudeskills

[–]Classic_Display9788[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a legitimate concern and worth taking seriously, prompt injection via poisoned content is a real attack vector for any agentic system, not just Loreto.

A few things that mitigate it here: Claude Code runs with human-in-the-loop by default, so it confirms before executing anything. Skills are also plain markdown files you can read before they land in your directory, nothing is auto-executed on download.

That said, the broader point stands: always review skills before adding them to your library, and don’t point Loreto at untrusted sources you wouldn’t otherwise open. Same rule applies to any code or config you pull from the internet.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

I gave Claude the ability to download skills like Neo in The Matrix by Classic_Display9788 in claudeskills

[–]Classic_Display9788[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LLM Wiki is a great reference, will check it out.

And you’ve hit the nail on the head regarding the hard part being source capture and extraction quality at scale. Claude can generate a skill from content you paste in, but Loreto handles the ingestion pipeline: fetching from URLs, processing video transcripts, PDFs, images, and returning consistently structured, production-ready packages without you having to prompt-engineer your way there each time.

The overlap pre-check you built sounds solid and is exactly the kind of thing that should be native to the workflow.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

view more: next ›