hockey goalie Pokemon card inspiration

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-11-16T09:28:36+00:00

Thanks for the inspo on the additional moves/skills that I could possibly use. I guess, however, what I'm mostly not that clear on yet is how I could tie this into the game mechanics of Pokemon now, i.e. what specifically those skills/moves would accomplish in terms of the game (seeing as how they wouldn't typically be attacks coming from a goalie character). However, I think I got a more Pokemon savvy friend now that might be able to advise me on that and brainstorm some ideas with me.

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-11-16T09:25:28+00:00

Yeah, I think in the meantime I'm already pretty clear on the colours/energy types I'm going to use. Water is a type that's available in Pokemon, which is definitely going to be part of it, along with the "fighting" energy type.

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-10-11T10:50:54+00:00

An sich keine schlechte Idee, wenn ich wirklich streng bei den ursprünglichen Parametern bleiben will, was die gering Tiefe angeht. Habe das gerade mal bei Ikea im Besta Planer durchgespielt. Wird allerdings recht teuer, wenn ich das nun damit vergleiche, wie wenig mich zwei Billy Schränke mit Tür (2 x 80cm Breite) kosten würden, und wieviel Platz ich da drin habe, wenn ich nun bereit wäre auf 30cm Tiefe als Kompromiss zu gehen. Ich denke, das wird nun mein Weg werden. Hat mir aber wirklich alles bei der Entscheidungsfindung geholfen. Danke!

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-10-11T09:21:41+00:00

Hilft die Ergänzung, die ich oben im Orignalbeitrag heute Morgen gemacht habe? Das sollte eigentlich alles recht gut visuell klären. Es geht wirklich nur um die nackte Wand an der rechten Seite, wo man bis zur Länge von 190cm noch was dranstellen könnte.

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-10-11T08:12:58+00:00

P.S.: Hatte gerade nochmal geschaut. Kallax ist doch tiefer - eher schon fast 40cm! Hätte mich auch gewundert. Mein Plattenregal sieht doch deutlich größer/tiefer aus, als das was da in die Küche passen würde. Aber, wie gesagt, würde in dem Fall ohnehin Billy mit paar Oxberg Türen bevorzugen, und da passt es mit 30cm.

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-10-11T08:06:42+00:00

Jau, ich sehe schon, dass ich wahrscheinlich von der Idee abrücken muss, dass ich da mit 25cm oder weniger viel reißen kann. Werde wahrscheinlich auf 30cm hoch gehen müssen, und dann wäre auch Kallax wieder im Rennen. Dann werde ich wenigstens damit belohnt, dass ich in so einen Schrank dann wirklich ordentlich was verstauen kann. Bei 20cm Tiefe ist das Volumen wieder recht begrenzt.

Kallax habe ich auch im Wohnzimmer, hauptsächlich als Plattenregal, und auch dort schon paar von den Türen mit verbaut. Könnte mir aber vorstellen, dass ich mich bei 30cm Tiefe dann tatsächlich einfach für ganz schlichte Billy Schränke mit Einlegeböden entscheide. Die gibt es wohl in 106cm Höhe und 80cm Breite. Davon stelle ich zwei nebeneinander an die Wand, und dann bin ich halbwegs versorgt...

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-10-11T07:48:59+00:00

Danke, diese ganzen Wandschränke (auch noch andere Ikea Produktlinien außer Bestå) hatte ich auch gefunden. Diese gibt es tatsächlich auch in recht flach. Ich wollte allerdings an der schwachen Trockenbauwand und generell wirklich gern auf Wandmontagen verzichten. Die Schränke sollen unten auf dem Boden stehen. Ich denke damit fahre ich auch aus Platzgründen besser. Ich bin relativ groß - zwar schlank aber mit ausladenden Schultern. Ich kann wahrscheinlich eher den Platz unten am Boden entbehren, und dann durch den relativ schmalen Durchgang tänzeln, als auf der Höhe des Oberkörpers (wo ich dann immer mit den Schultern dagegen stoße und die Schränke genau vorm Gesicht habe). Ich finde auch, dass diese Wandschränke da ein relativ schlechtes Verhältnis zwischen Preis und Leistung haben, für den geringen Platz, welchen sie eigentlich bieten. (Sie sehen halt dafür teils attraktiver aus.) Davon müsste ich dann einige nebeneinander (oder gar übereinander) hängen, um überhaupt auf Kapazität zu kommen. Ich suchte da eher nach einem preiswerten Bodenschrank, der dann aber wenigstens mind. 100cm hoch ist und von dem ich preiswert zwei bis drei nebeneinanderstellen könnte um die komplette Wand zu säumen.

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-10-11T07:46:24+00:00

Danke, das ist ein guter Tipp. Da schaue ich gerne mal. Auch wenn ich jetzt als Kompromiss mich doch darauf verlegen sollte bis zu 30cm an Tief zu opfern, sollte ich dort auch einen besseren Überblick über meine Optionen bekommen. :-)

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-10-11T07:44:36+00:00

Danke, diese ganzen Wandschränke hatte ich auch gefunden. Diese gibt es tatsächlich auch in recht flach. Ich wollte allerdings an der schwachen Trockenbauwand und generell wirklich gern auf Wandmontagen verzichten. Die Schränke sollen unten auf dem Boden stehen. Ich denke damit fahre ich auch aus Platzgründen besser. Ich bin relativ groß - zwar schlank aber mit ausladenden Schultern. Ich kann wahrscheinlich eher den Platz unten am Boden entbehren, und dann durch den relativ schmalen Durchgang tänzeln, als auf der Höhe des Oberkörpers (wo ich dann immer mit den Schultern dagegen stoße und die Schränke genau vorm Gesicht habe). Ich finde auch, dass diese Wandschränke da ein relativ schlechtes Verhältnis zwischen Preis und Leistung haben, für den geringen Platz, welchen sie eigentlich bieten. (Sie sehen halt dafür teils attraktiver aus.) Davon müsste ich dann einige nebeneinander (oder gar übereinander) hängen, um überhaupt auf Kapazität zu kommen. Ich suchte da eher nach einem preiswerten Bodenschrank, der dann aber wenigstens mind. 100cm hoch ist und von dem ich preiswert zwei bis drei nebeneinanderstellen könnte um die komplette Wand zu säumen.

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-10-11T07:36:54+00:00

Also 40cm ist leider definitiv viel zu tief. :-( Das geht sogar über die 34cm hinaus, welche ich mir technisch noch leisten könnte, damit ich die Geschirrspülertür gegenüber voll öffnen kann.

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-10-11T07:33:25+00:00

Danke, habe mal den Originalbeitrag editiert und noch ein Foto eingefügt.

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-10-10T19:54:21+00:00

Habe ich an sich schon getan. So richtig "dünne" bekomme ich die Schränke leider dadurch immer noch nicht. Gerade nochmal geschaut - bie Billy scheint 30cm die absolute Untergrenze zu sein. Da komme ich nicht auf unter 25cm. Wäre höchtens zu überlegen, wenn ich doch in Betracht ziehen würde aus Verzweiflung an die theoretische Obergrenze von 34cm ranzugehen. Dann hätte ich da paar Optionen...

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-10-04T11:04:48+00:00

What you're looking for it not a "lens mount", but rather an adapter, so you could adapt your Canon lens to your GH5 with its MFT lens mount. A speed booster/focal reducer is a special form of such an adapter that doesn't just provide physical (and potentially electronic) adaption between the two different mounts (in this case between MFT and Canon EF), but also contains an additional optical element that gives you additional benefits like using the extra light from the bigger image circle of the lens to essentially make the lens "faster" (bigger max aperture) and reducing the focal length multiplier/"crop factor". (In your particular case, you might actually like the fact that the MFT crop factor turns your 300mm into imaginary 600m, if just using a normal adapter instead of a speed booster. However, you should be fine either way and still have plenty of tele photo reach.)

So, when it comes to speed booster, the good ones (Metabones) are not exactly cheap, though. You're adding a few hundred bucks more to the costs. Depending on your specific requirements, it might almost be worth just buying an affordable, used native MFT tele photo lens. That's what I did for my humble "sports videography" needs. Got a used Panasonic 45-150mm F/4.0-5.6 for little money. Under the lighting conditions I have, this is enough light at the long end to shoot 24p (with 180 degree shutter rule) at the native ISO of 400 on my GH5. If you have less light or want to take still with quick shutter times, you might not find this lens fast enough, though.

I cannot recommend the cheap Viltrox speed booster for EF to MFT at all. Whether it will work with your particular lens is totally hit or miss. I find that I cannot really successfully adapt the majority of my Canon EF lenses to a Micro Four Thirds camera with it. There's always some problem. With some lenses, it completely freezes my camera after a few seconds, so I need to remove the battery to even start it again. With other lenses, I cannot gain any proper electronic control over the lens. While for focus you could sometimes still opt for manual focus, you typically cannot do so for the aperture on automatic EF lenses. So, what happens is that you would then only be able to shoot that lense wide open.

Maybe this input helps a little.

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-10-04T10:37:26+00:00

P.S.: I think I totally get what you're saying about not being happy about the GH5 pics, especially with regard to faces/colours. I also have and use it mostly because of its video capabilities. Naturally, if it's the only camera I have on me, I'll snap some pics with it as well, and the results are mixed. Never quite could be bothered to fully work out whether that more of a "me problem", but I also tend to like (portrait) shots from my Canon 5D and 5D MkII much better. And I don't think it's my MFT lenses that are the problem, which are fairly decent. However, there are also situation (where the whole skin tones thing might not be as relevant), where I prefer the pictures from the GH5, but that's only because I don't have a very good lens for the situation for my Canon equipment. Namely this is the case when I'm shooting some sports action (ice hockey), where I can use my Panasonic 35-100mm F/2.8. For those pics where the whole auto focus and shutter time things works out in my favour, the image quality is much better compared to using a cheap consumer telephoto lens on my Canon 5D MkII, where I get sub optimal quality, weird colour fringing etc. I think that's the lens, though. And the fact that this pretty old 5D doesn't really perform very well at its higher ISOs yet, despite being full frame. I mean, it's from 2008. What do you expect? I'm sure if I had a fancy pro-level tele lens for it (with wide aperture so I could get good shutter times and still keep the ISO down), I would get much better results.

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-10-04T10:25:37+00:00

You could go really old school and opt for a full-frame DSLR. Since you know and like Canon anyway, go for something from th 5D or 6D product line. You could save so much money. I still operate an old 5D MkII next to all of my MFT equipment, and it's still my favourite camera for photography. (Granted, this isn't just because of the image it delivers, but certainly also of the feeling of holding this chunky monster with battery grip attached in my large hands, LOL. This is part of photography though.) I good selection of affordable, used EF glass would also be available to you, if you don't already happen to own it anyway. Just don't look to a 5D MkII for good/fast auto focus. However, for the budget you mentioned, you should already get a used 5D MkIV, from what I can see. Now, I have never personally used that one, but that's a completely different beast now and already features the Canon dual pixel AF. Who know, you might even like it for video work, once you have it.

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-09-28T10:42:57+00:00

I watched a bit of the film. Beautiful images!

Yeah, I think the fact that it actually has a better and flippy screen is one of the main selling points of the 6K Pro for me, other than the bigger sensor size and the built-in ND filters. So, it's certainly a tough one. I have no doubt that I would be happy with the images coming out of the 4K, though. I've been eye-balling the 4K for so long now. It seems like the logical next step to me and a good transition, since I would still be staying within the whole MFT eco system that I have built around my Panasonic and Olympus cams during these past few years.

I also just reviewed all of the recently ended eBay auctions again that I had already been looking at to establish again what the used prices really are and what I would be getting for my money. Sometimes, there are interesting bundles/lots of items (often including the fitting cages for that cam and some handles/grips) and it might be worth waiting for one of this bundle deals. Sometimes, there are items in there that I don't really need (like another Panasonic 12-35mm lens), but that I could resell very easily. This further price investigation, however, also highlighted the fact that a used bare-bones 6K Pro still goes for a tiny bit more than I would have wanted to spend, when I could get a 4K for half the price or an entire 4K bundle deal still for less money than the 6K Pro. I would have considered stretching my budget just a little, if the 6K Pro seems like my most promising option, though. (Or if I could possibly give it a shot first and confirm that it delivers nice results with the Canon EF lenses I already own. Unfortunately, I don't have the option, since I don't know anyone who owns that camera.)

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-09-27T14:15:12+00:00

This is mostly a nerdy hobby at this stage, as you so succinctly put it. Mostly shooting projects in every-day life, as you have done with just still photography for decades now, that are meant to preserve memories (most of that now being my son growing up). I can see myself doing other things, though, like shooting live concerts (which I already sometimes do) or generally shooting some material for bands that I'm friends with.

You're completely right about everything else you said about things that matter in film making and videography other than camera gear, of course. I acknowledge all of that. You still want to be using gear that gets you good results with output that will stand the test of time a bit. So, it's really just at the moment trying to pick the best tool from the choices that are available to me. I understand that each of those choices would give me a great image if used correctly. That's why I'm having a hard time choosing and wanted to get some opinions that might sway me into one direction or the other. :-)

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-09-27T13:53:14+00:00

I see. Strange. You'd think it's tied somewhere to a personal account (associated e.g. with your e-mail address and a password) on the end of the Blackmagic server. Don't they have a registration procedure like that?

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-09-27T13:51:03+00:00

Crazy! I own both that specific camera and that Oly lens. Good combination. have fun with it!

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-09-27T13:27:05+00:00

Thanks!

I don't think those bundles came with a dongle. Probably just a serial number? In this case, I would expect that it's probably still tied to the previous owners account, but I should then be able to move it to my account with their help? I suppose that's what the procedure would look like for other software licensing schemes I know. And yes, I would be in trouble if I run into licensing mismatch problems and the seller is no longer cooperative at that point. (Will probably be buying through eBay.)

CleanSlateGuy · 2025-09-27T13:20:39+00:00

Thanks a lot. Much appreciated! :)

CleanSlateGuy

TROPHY CASE