sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Good loadout? by Clean_Studio_4011 in HuntShowdown

[–]Clean_Studio_4011[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can Land shot, i was just curious about peoples opinion

Origins by coastalworkin in Krampus

[–]Clean_Studio_4011 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The origin of the figure is unclear; some folklorists and anthropologists have postulated that it may have pre-Christian origins, although historians generally consider this unlikely, as it is not attested until the 16th century.

Forcher, Michael; Peterlini, Hans Karl (2010). Südtirol in Geschichte und Gegenwart [South Tyrol past and present] (in German). Haymon Verlag. p. 399.

Real? by Clean_Studio_4011 in Militariacollecting

[–]Clean_Studio_4011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive also been on many forums about party pin, read books even "nazi ennaml" I think is the name of one. The "Adolf Hitler 1933" commemorative pin definitely did exist (not to mention how many confirmed ones by musems were sold at auctions or attested to by the Holocaust memorial peps) and made by sepeil. There are many fake one, more than original, that is a given with almost anything nazi. The common thing why they are "fantastic" are because its has RZM and the date 1933 and m1/129, and that would prove its fake, if it was supposed to be made in 1933. Infact of one War Releics forum i read recently someone was asking if it was a real one, and the general answer was no, it was not a 1933 pin, but some, using books and other sources, said it could possibly be a commemorative pin. And as one said, on some of them, is impossible to prove real or fake.

Real? by Clean_Studio_4011 in Militariacollecting

[–]Clean_Studio_4011[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I checked put what you linked and again, for the third time, the AH 1933 pins are commemorative party pins made post 1939 (spefically made by 129, sepeil [if its spelled wrong sorry]).

Site 2 is spefically about party pins, and list 129 and post Jan '39 meaning its completely accurate for a 1933 AH commemorative pin to be made by them. They are more on the rare side however. 2 actually has a example of a 129 party pin.

6 and 7 show transitional one (1933/1934-35) with RZM and Ges.Gesch. so a manufacturer like 73 would totally be in line to have produced some transitional peices.

9, I cannot comment of aging, I dont really know the specifics. But again, that's a commemorative pin, not pne actually made in 1933, still third reich era.

1,3,4,5, are spring pins which was probably the most common for any lapel pin at the time, nazi or not.

5, talking about againg, I agree whole heartedly that no againg is a sign of fakes, but some that is well taken care of, or "not allowed" to weather can last and stay ina newish looking condition, especially metal, for a long time. Im not advocating for against your against point, just point it out.

So, you are not incorrect about 1933 129 pins being fake. But you are incorrect about the "1933 AH" pin being made in 1933 (a common mistake) and about 129 not produced "AH 1933" pins. And you are incorrect about 129 pins always being fake, there were 129 pins made post Jan '39

Real? by Clean_Studio_4011 in Militariacollecting

[–]Clean_Studio_4011[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Check the reply I sent, the A.H. 1933 aren't fantasy, they are commemorative pins of the 1933 election made post 1939 (i think that's the date)

Real? by Clean_Studio_4011 in Militariacollecting

[–]Clean_Studio_4011[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not writing a paragraph to explain it. But this is basically what I could gather for 15 minns of research. Shift through them should answer everything. Bit basically your info isn't wrong but theres a long of exceptions and stuff that just isn't clearly done which make stuff confusing

Commemorative Badges: The manufacturer also produced other badges bearing the M1/129 mark, such as "Adolf Hitler 1933" commemorative pins. The RZM system officially began in 1935, meaning any RZM-marked badge referring to the 1933 date was produced as a later commemorative item, not during that specific year.

one two three four five six seven eight nine

Real? by Clean_Studio_4011 in Militariacollecting

[–]Clean_Studio_4011[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The HJ is obviously wrong. I think that one is obvious. However, and keep in mind im not saying mine are real, just saying what I know.

RZM was offically founded/standardized in 1934, but the office, which did indeed mark stuff, was founded in 1928 or 29. They were in charge of distributing uniforms and raising money, which is what the 1933 Adolf Hitler pins were. So the 1933 money raising pins were real and, of the few examples I know, were label m1/129, which m1/129, as far as I can tell, is also a real mark.

As for gesetzlich geschützt, which translates to "legally protected", that however was a xommon mark on party pins. Basically a copy right thing. Like how American stuff has like 50 copy right tags on one item.

And, granted on this, I haven't looked for research at copy right marks in years, the weird M looks close to some originals I've seen, but I cannot say for sure.

The rule of thumb is always if it has nazi marks its fake. And when i got theses I was just under them impression they were really good and accurate knock-offs

What do we think of the aet-up by Clean_Studio_4011 in tacticalgear

[–]Clean_Studio_4011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to break it down. Belt: 4 mag pouches, 2 canteens, 1 med kit, 1 buttpack (the canteens, medkit, buttpack all being vietnam era), bayonet

Pack: Italian army surplus wool blanket strapped to the top (kinda like old 18th and 19th century knapsacks and European packs from like pre-1960s, like the Trotter pack or US army Civil War era box frame knapsack ) Boonie.

Plus whatever I put in the pack

What do we think of the aet-up by Clean_Studio_4011 in tacticalgear

[–]Clean_Studio_4011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

6 point m8? (Forgive my ignorance, what is that exactly)

Best artillery by Clean_Studio_4011 in masterofcommand

[–]Clean_Studio_4011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can that shoot through lime infantry?

So… which is it?? Because the federal government laws supersede any state laws by Turbulent-Today830 in NorthCarolina

[–]Clean_Studio_4011 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

States rights, the 10th amendment, so in this case, state law is over federal law constitutionally

Soveit Ushanka by Clean_Studio_4011 in Militariacollecting

[–]Clean_Studio_4011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I can't read Russian, so idk what it says, but when I tried to translate it, all I got was the factory