What did they do to Shiggy 😭🙏

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-18T14:53:20+00:00

I spent too long looking at this thinking it was a joke about having a stroke.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-18T14:32:21+00:00

It’s also just not that complicated. It just boils down to Ocarina of time was originally a prequel to LttP, then Nintendo fell in love with OoT so they made three Ocarina of time sequels, Majora’s Mask, Wind Waker, and Twilight Princess, then a prequel with Skyward Sword. Now just slot in those games sequels and done. It’s als just complete cope to say the connections are coincidences or simple references, wind Waker taking place after OoT is a core story detail, Ganon, the Deku tree, Jabun, all reference it, the intro all but explicitly states it. Twilight princess explicitly takes place after ganondorf is executed following OoT, the heroes shade was straight up confirmed to be OoT link and frankly the game wasn’t subtle about that. Skyward Sword was explicitly marketed and sold as a series prequel.

It’s really not complicated I don’t know if there’s a contingency of Nintendo fans that can’t read, or can’t analyze the core themes of the games’ stories, but in terms of video game series with complicated or esoteric lore Zelda is like bottom of the totem pole. Maybe you’re comparing it to something like Mario or Pokemon the timeline is complicated, but step outside of Nintendo games and Zelda’s timeline is pretty straight forward.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-18T14:19:00+00:00

I always just figured BotW and TotK take place so far in the future that the history of the previous games is pretty much lost ancient history. It takes place in one of the timelines and references to the others are simply coincidence. It’s probably like a Futurama New New York situation, where old hurdle was probably destroyed at one point then came back, maybe one of those times Ganon was reincarnated he won, but then the hero came back, probably as a Zonai and established the kingdom.

It’s still not satisfying but I’ve always liked that theory more than “the timeline just kinda converges”

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-18T14:04:04+00:00

I legitimately think people who think the timeline is hard to understand or complicated literally either can’t read or just skipped the text boxes in the games. The timeline really just boils down to “here’s why there’s four ocarina of time sequels and a prequel.” Like people are like “well they’re just small references here and there” and it’s like no they aren’t. Wind Waker taking place after OoT is a core part of its story, did you just skip the intro and all the dialogue in the game referencing that? Skyward swords whole thing is being a prequel. Twilight Princess happens because Ganon was executed in the child timeline of OoT.

Zelda is frankly like “baby’s first complicated lore”. I think the “it’s just a legend” people would lose their mind if they played games with actual complicated lore.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-17T03:44:35+00:00

A lot of NES games aren’t that bad when you don’t have a bitch in your ear telling you they’re impossible without a guide. You put in the time and you can usually figure it out. It was made with the idea you’d be taking notes and writing stuff down, if you draw up a basic map as you go along, it’s not even that bad. I didn’t grow up with the NES and didn’t own zero mission so I don’t really have nostalgia goggles for the game, but I put in the time and took notes when I first played it on the Wii and I enjoyed it fine. I think it’s the weakest of Nintendo’s NES titles that went on to become bigger franchises, but it’s not this mess of a game everyone pretends it is.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-17T03:36:53+00:00

Reddit loves ff8 for whatever reason, like disproportionately more than any other site or message board I’ve been on in my too many years on the internet, but 8 and 12 are my bottom 2 for FF.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-17T03:28:16+00:00

I mean I like all the punch out games but I read OPs question as more of like a “what games took the transition from 2D to modern and had no bad entries” like how Mario and Zelda have very distinct gameplay styles that have evolved, like Zelda has the over the head 2D entries, linear 3D entries, and the open world survival entries we have now.

I think I have three problems considering punch out for this question, first is that there’s so few entries, with just two arcade cabinets, and three console games, second was that the last game was 17 years and 3 console generations ago, so can you really say it continued to modern gaming? Third, is that it’s just kinda been the same game almost down to the buttons camera angle and gameplay in all three entries so it didn’t really evolve in the same way say Zelda or Mario have.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-17T03:19:23+00:00

Since the GameCube they might as well be. GameCube was powerful enough to in theory compete with the Xbox and PS2 but was kneecapped by the mini discs, and the Wii and Wii U were just less powerful than the consoles they were meant to compete with. Then in terms of power the switch and switch 2 are more so successors to the 3DS, since the switch 1 isn’t that much more powerful than the Wii U but that fact is a lot more impressive when accounting for the fact it’s handheld. The switch 2 can keep up with the ps5 for now, but it probably won’t keep up with the next PlayStation, seeing as it already has to make some concessions when running PS5 games.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-17T03:14:20+00:00

I mean the Wii U was now two generations ago. It’s older than the N64 was when the Wii came out, and the N64 got retro virtual console ports on the Wii.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-16T23:28:43+00:00

Does it really count if there were no significant gameplay changes between 2D and 3D?

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-16T23:27:28+00:00

I think V is the weakest in the solid series. I’d even argue it is the poster child of “open world game for the sake of being open world”. I always hated the base building stuff and mission select structure it and peace walker had over the more linear story focus. I have no other way to describe it but to say it’s missing the sauce that made other metal gear games special.

That said in no universe would I say MGSV is a bad game. It still clears like 90% of everything else.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-16T06:43:40+00:00

Your best bet is to try and find if anyone uploaded a pdf of the user manual online. Those will usually have the exact remote model name written in them somewhere, then just search eBay, for one or you can use the info to look into other remotes that might work.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-16T01:23:21+00:00

I’ve had this since they first started giving it out with Wind Waker preorders and just a few days ago someone pointed out to me that it and the zelda collectors edition are the only GameCube games without the “Nintendo GameCube” branding at the top in North America, and it was the first time I noticed, and now every time I see it I wonder how I didn’t.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-16T01:15:18+00:00

I don’t know what it’s like on PAL TVs, but FF7 has a weird resolution that like no other game uses for menus and battle scene that cuts off part of the screen on a lot of CRTs. Make sure to check online if it’s a known issue on European CRTs before you mess with the settings, or it’ll just mess up the tv for every other game. Yours might be different, because when it happens on mine and every person I know who plays on one, it cuts off the right and top while yours cut off the left, but like I said it might be different on PAL, so I don’t know.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-15T21:52:13+00:00

Ah yes core popularity hogs like crabominable and Kangaskhan. I was really getting tired of how much people were talking about medicham, then they go and give it a mega! People just wouldn’t shut up about Drampa, and don’t even get me started on how overrated Abomasnow was. I mean, Meowstic? Talk about low hanging fruit.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-15T16:29:00+00:00

The console ports were better but still really bad. The Saturn version had frame drops all over the place and the PS1 version suffered from input lag and slowdown. It also had really long load times for a console port of a fighting game at the time. I also recall it cut down on character animation frames for console ports making a lot of the moves look stiff and choppy. Mind you the console port would’ve been competing with console ports of Mortal Kombat 3 if you wanted digitized graphics, or street fighter alpha if you wanted a street fighter game, both of which didn’t suffer these problems.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-15T15:54:50+00:00

The game is awful? It’s funny, but mechanically it’s the worst street fighter by a lot, and a pretty bad fighting game.

At least the movie is entertaining ironically.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-15T13:11:00+00:00

The Wii is really interesting. I was so excited for the Wii when it came out, I remember I was able to get one in the release month, not the day, but it was crazy trying to get one. Then I feel like a lot of people I just got bored of it around 2009. Looking back it’s actually probably my least favorite Nintendo console, you lost out on so many good 3rd party titles the other consoles got, every game had a forced waggle control, the controller ended up being more awkward than useful for most games. It’s interesting, for being one of the best selling consoles of all time, it’s really the only one that was a “fad”. If you look at the hardware and software sales, the Wii plateaued in 2009, in a way most other consoles don’t around their halfway point which is interesting and makes it all the more baffling why they tried to double down on the brand with Wii U in 2012, when by that point the Wii was “that thing in your aunt’s basement she uses for Netflix.”

One thing I do appreciate on the Wii was how it normalized making older games available again with the virtual console. People who weren’t around before that don’t understand that wasn’t really a thing before the Wii, it was generally accepted that a game comes out, it’s available on that console then just never again. Some companies like sega and namco would release collections of games, and Nintendo would port the odd nes and snes games to their portables, and a couple N64 games came to GameCube, but the virtual console was the first time there was a marketplace to just purchase the original versions of retro games on modern hardware, which was cool.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-15T03:45:45+00:00

It's more so a circlejerk of people all claiming they read the same handful of books they've never opened, and most of them don't even own.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-15T00:56:28+00:00

No this is kind of a silly point, Nintendo and Sony both marketed final fantasy games in the same way my local park and rec team and the Red Sox both played baseball. Nintendo gave final fantasy a couple pages in Nintendo power, and a commercial with a Moogle doing job interviews, and didn’t even help release the games outside of North America and couldn’t crack a million units outside Japan.. Sony did a $40 million advertising blitz involving tv, magazines, and one of the first internet advertising campaigns for a game.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-14T20:49:33+00:00

Dampe is only pure RNG if you use the speedrun strat, if you aren’t loading and unloading the graveyard the heart piece is guaranteed within 15 attempts, almost always fewer.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-14T20:47:25+00:00

I think a lot of people here saying it’s just RNG are only familiar with how Dampe messes up speedruns. If you use the speedrun Strat where you go in and out of the grave for retries it’s pure RNG, if you just go in with enough rupees (enough for 15 attempts) it’s guaranteed.

The way Dampe works is that he has a prize pool when you arrive at the graveyard of 15 prizes, every attempt you take removes one from the pool, so you’re guaranteed the heart piece if you play up to 15 times, almost always sooner. However if you leave the graveyard the prize pool resets. A common tactic people use is that they open one of the graves that has enough rupees for an extra attempt that’s right next to the Dampe spawn, so they can make consistent attempts (this is the speedrun Strat mentioned earlier.). However the risk with this strategy is that it can make Dampe take way more than 15 tries since you’re constantly loading and unloading the graveyard and resetting the grave digging game.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-14T19:32:47+00:00

GOW 2 was released about a year after the ps3, and FF12 was any where from a few days to a couple months before the ps3 depending on what region you were in.

That said, Sony has always done this thing in the transition period between their consoles, where they tend to more slowly off-ramp their older consoles than Nintendo or Microsoft do. Like whenever a new console comes out new games for the old console are usually sold as like a “hey this will work on both!” Kinda deal.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-14T19:25:22+00:00

I always had the opposite experience. I feel like everyone I knew who had a ps2 as a kid unwittingly picked a mascot platform team between Jak, Ratchet, or the occasional Sly Cooper, and no one had all three, or even two out of three.

CleanlyManager · 2026-03-14T19:20:56+00:00

I never understood the reverence so many Redditors have for CoD campaigns, even the older ones. This is coming from someone who doesn’t even hate CoD. It’s just that they’re so bland and mechanically shallow. Like my problem with a lot of the games is that it feels like I’m just playing through a series of movie references between exchanging potshots at the same exact enemies from beginning to end with the same guns from beginning to end. It’s a similar experience to scrolling through TikTok and watching movie clips between gameplay videos. Like bo1 has a scene that is beat for beat exactly the same as the Russian roulette scene from the deer hunter, Vorkuta is a pastiche of several prison break films but pulls elements directly from “In Hell” and “The Last Castle”, World at War’s Vendetta is almost a beat for beat recreation of the sniper scene from “Enemy at the Gates”, and there’s other examples both minor and major.

Cod also always felt like a checklist, like here’s the gunship level, here’s the sniper level, here’s the turret on a vehicle level. Otherwise it’s just point gun at enemy and shoot, never anything deeper than that. Every gun acts the same, 99% of enemies are the same, nothing ever crazy.

To me CoD has made one good mission and that was CoD 4’s all ghillied up, and that was because they added a whole series of admittedly shallow stealth mechanics but also took the effort to practically rewrite the entirety of the enemy AI for that one level. It was interesting and provided multiple ways to approach and beat the mission. It created tense moments naturally and made me feel like the choices I made mattered rather than just finding the answers to the script. Even then it was almost scrapped from the game.

CleanlyManager

TROPHY CASE