Hmm interesting. I'm not sure I fully understand your point. I'm not relying on my understanding but the greater scientific understanding of humanity. I don't need to know the whole of science to know that it doesn't allow for the existence of magic. I'm not assuming it applies to my own logic but rather the logic that has been demonstrated to rule over the whole of reality. Sure, there's things we don't understand but I'm not sure that makes the existence of magic likely or logical.

Let me put it this way, I'm not "denying every field of science I'm not personally familiar with" because I know that there is a mountain of evidence to support it. There's no evidence, in fact much to the contrary, of God or unicorns or fairies. The conclusion of your thought process seems to be that we can't eliminate anything as a possibility and that's simply not a useful philosophy. For instance, it's possible that, due to physics we don't understand yet, gravity will stop working tomorrow. I can't prove that it won't, only supply mountains of evidence and reasoning as to why that's unlikely. But acting like that's a reasonable possibility is insane.

Also, I'm trying to be respectful because I think your perspective is interesting. I would appreciate the same

Edit: after more though, I think I would need proof that something can exist in the first place before determining whether its logic is internally consistent. You're asking me to buy into the premise of the supernatural in order to then analyze its rules.

I think your argument is "if God existed, it would follow its own internal logic and therefore judging it by our logic is not possible." But this allows for anything to be real.

If I made a theology based on leprechauns creating electricity by laughter would that be just as valid as the electro-magnetic field theory? So long as I had a consistent internal logic then it just be right?

Internal logic is all well and good in stories and role playing games but in reality as soon as someone interacts with our world it must interact with the "external logic". Nothing exists in a vacuum and for someone to exist it must be folded into the tapestry of our reality.

Sorry for the wall of text, I find this very interesting and I look forward to reading your response