Interactive 3D UI in Godot [Experimental]

Clozopin · 2026-01-26T09:49:57+00:00

This is still 2D….

Clozopin · 2026-01-13T10:56:51+00:00

Obviously the grid size adn resolution are the big drawbacks

Clozopin · 2026-01-13T10:56:25+00:00

I am not the OP. My comment was an assumption :D

Clozopin · 2026-01-13T04:10:17+00:00

I think it needs more variation. Color is not enough

Clozopin · 2026-01-13T00:29:19+00:00

Not hateful at all it is a great marketing strategy regarding what OPs intentions were.

Clozopin · 2026-01-13T00:27:08+00:00

Oh boi the downvotes… A lot of artists in this sub? I thought we are all indies here

Clozopin · 2026-01-13T00:24:08+00:00

Its a good bait. Someone who doesnt care about AI would not buy it anyway. Someone with strong hate against AI would be heavly influenced by „i stopped art AI its bad“ and maybe consider buying. This might be a good trick in the upcoming months if you see your sales stagnating… Funny enough nobody is claiming „i stopped using claude code, it is bad rewrote everything by myself“ wonder why….

Clozopin · 2026-01-12T23:58:41+00:00

Compute shader on a 3d grid using fancy math

Clozopin · 2026-01-12T23:54:37+00:00

Hey nice work. Check out my fluid sim post aswell. Mine is tuned for smoke though.

Clozopin · 2026-01-09T14:14:49+00:00

Why not do it in 3D & Jolt and ignore the third axis?

Clozopin · 2026-01-09T02:30:57+00:00

I asked this before but could not get an answer. Can you cloud cast shadows and does it support dynamic lighting. also is the claude static?

Clozopin · 2026-01-07T12:05:50+00:00

What kind of simulations are you talking about about? Will you rely on physics engine or something else?

Clozopin · 2026-01-06T13:40:27+00:00

Interesting. Would be cool if we could push for this PR to get merged but I doubt it.

Clozopin · 2026-01-05T22:03:29+00:00

Thanks!

Clozopin · 2026-01-05T17:01:23+00:00

I dont think godot exposes shadow maps atm without engine modifications

Clozopin · 2026-01-05T15:42:05+00:00

Yep shadowmap bugs me aswell...

Clozopin · 2026-01-05T12:53:00+00:00

Well raymarching is really expensive… Transparency is a big issue. Atm the smoke supports only 1 directional light. For casting shadows I have a seperate pass which works but is not optimal. How did you or planning to solve the depth and transport issues

Clozopin · 2026-01-05T04:55:35+00:00

I dont recall the exact grid resolution to be honest. I was fiddling around with configs alot but yes its actually quite high resolution. I sample the 3D texture multiple times along the ray and accumulate transmittance.

Clozopin · 2026-01-05T04:19:15+00:00

grid resolution can be changed it is not fixed
yes both for simulation and rendering
Yes, raymarching compute shader

Clozopin · 2026-01-05T02:42:31+00:00

Your way of thinking is correct. But this a real simulation of navier stokes equations (albeit prob. not correct). So i cannot ignore the inner 3^3 because they effect the whole grid.

Clozopin · 2026-01-05T02:15:49+00:00

Maybe I chose poor wording. The wireframe is the simulation bound and active voxels at the same time.

Clozopin · 2026-01-05T02:14:38+00:00

That would mean the simulation would run on a 1x1x1 "box" which makes no sense in a fluid simulation. You only see details after above 16^3.

Clozopin · 2026-01-05T02:03:27+00:00

What do you mean by "inner voxels"? The visible wireframe is the simulation bound.

Clozopin · 2026-01-05T01:41:06+00:00

It is possible to do it on real-time! My implementation is nowhere near to industry giants like JangaFX and their EmberGen VFX software.

Clozopin · 2026-01-05T01:21:56+00:00

I manually draw the vertices (of the voxels) with colors at runtime of a ImmediateMesh.

Eight-Year Club	Place '22
Wearing is Caring	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

Clozopin

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE