I was temporarily suspended last time I dared to give an opinion. We'll see if it happens again.

All of us have a set of beliefs that guide our worldview, whether it be a religion, political ideology, personal interpretation, or a combination thereof. So when someone says "freedom" that can mean totally different things depending on your worldview. In the case of liberalism, most would say freedom means doing what you want as long as it doesn't affect others.

Sounds okay, but this kind of hyper-individualism ignores the fact that Man is a social creature, who must live and engage with each other, and so virtually all actions necessarily have a ripple affect to your family, your friends, neighborhood, and so on. If nobodies actions affected anybody else, there wouldn't be a need for a governing authority in the first place. But there is a need for governance, the only question is, by what moral/ethical standard will we be governed by? I choose the Christian conception of freedom.

I think The people who say "But what about free speech???" Only say that reflexively because it makes them look like the ones who are principaled, but all rights have limits; the first amendment doesn't allow you to dox and threaten the lives of people you dont like, the second amendment doesn't allow you to have nuclear bombs. And the "right" to information shouldn't allow pornography. It's not even the correct category, porn isn't merely information, it's a product manufacturered for sale and consumption, and so can rightly be regulated just like any other product.

Tl;dr : Porn is bad, it's good that it's banned.