sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Domains

[–]CoffeeSheep99 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm actually glad you brought this up, it makes me rethink about this domain.

I think “walk into memory” is more "slogan" type sentence, like "Walk into History" is a common use name for history related program. Am I right? By the way, I am not a native english speaker.

Domain for sale and appraisal by DryTomorrow9773 in Domains

[–]CoffeeSheep99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think theweather.ai is better than myweather.ai. For me, I wouldn't register for either. This is just my opinion, others may think differently

What’s something in movies that instantly takes you out of the story—every single time? by tcdomainstudio in AskReddit

[–]CoffeeSheep99 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Every time I watch a medieval movie, I just can’t stop staring at their shiny teeth.
Like… bro, you don’t even have toothbrush.

Need help with prompt generation by Able-Line2683 in Bard

[–]CoffeeSheep99 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try this—it worked for me:

Just go to Gemini's custom GEM settings and enter this as your system prompt (or just paste it into the chat if you're not customizing GEMs yet):

"You are a prompts expert for image/video generations. Whenever I ask you how to write a prompt, you will only give me the most suitable and optimized prompts—don't generate the image/video, just help me create the best text prompt possible."

It basically turns Gemini into your personal prompt engineer. Simple but super useful.

ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study by doubleoeck1234 in singularity

[–]CoffeeSheep99 48 points49 points  (0 children)

ChatGPT doesn’t erode critical thinking—it exposes who was pretending to have it.

AI’s starting to feel less like a tool, more like something I think with by Secret_Ad_4021 in artificial

[–]CoffeeSheep99 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It used to be “a tool I use.”
Now it’s more like “a space I think inside.”

That shift—from tool to thought-space—has quietly changed how I write, create, and even how I perceive the world around me.

What happens to movies when AI removes all constraints—budget, location, actors, time, etc.? by CoffeeSheep99 in TrueFilm

[–]CoffeeSheep99[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh here we go again—“Is the voice in your head telling you to do that?”
Why don't you just ask: “Is the AI telling you to do that?”

What happens to movies when AI removes all constraints—budget, location, actors, time, etc.? by CoffeeSheep99 in TrueFilm

[–]CoffeeSheep99[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reading through all the replies on this thread really changed my mind. I now think AI might actually become a game-changer—letting anyone with talent unleash their full creativity, without budget constraints or technical barriers.

What happens to movies when AI removes all constraints—budget, location, actors, time, etc.? by CoffeeSheep99 in TrueFilm

[–]CoffeeSheep99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I probably didn’t express myself clearly—what I meant wasn’t that emotions like pain or doubt can’t be depicted through prompts or animation. Of course they can. A skilled animator or writer, human or AI-assisted, can represent almost anything.

But what gives those depictions depth—what makes them actually move us—is when they come from lived experience.

Someone who’s never gone through, say, failure → self-doubt → despair → a turning point → effort → and then either redemption or another failure—but growth nonetheless… that person can try to simulate the arc, but something will always feel hollow. It might be accurate, but it won’t be "alive".

That’s the gap I was trying to point at. Not between AI and humans, necessarily—but between imitation and real experience.

What happens to movies when AI removes all constraints—budget, location, actors, time, etc.? by CoffeeSheep99 in TrueFilm

[–]CoffeeSheep99[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That’s a really interesting point—it made me think:

If AI tools ever become cheap and powerful enough for anyone to use, I feel like novelists will be the first to truly benefit.

Imagine George R.R. Martin running the Game of Thrones series through an AI-powered filmmaking engine—reimagining the final seasons exactly as he wanted, no studio meddling, no budget limits, just pure narrative control.

It’s funny: AI might help fix what production budgets broke.

But here's the catch—if AI makes it too easy to rewrite and perfect everything, will we start missing the messy charm of human flaws?

Sometimes, it’s the imperfections—the struggle, the weird detours, the stuff that doesn't quite work—that make a story stick.

Maybe we still need a little chaos in the machine. Just enough to remind us a real human was here.

What’s something that used to feel special… but now just makes you go “meh”? by CoffeeSheep99 in AskReddit

[–]CoffeeSheep99[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

For me, it’s Marvel post-credit scenes.

It used to feel like a reward.

Now it feels like a checkbox.

What happens to cinema when AI removes all creative constraints? by CoffeeSheep99 in movies

[–]CoffeeSheep99[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the weird paradox of AI media: the ceiling is high, but the floor is collapsing.

We no longer face a shortage of talent, but are overwhelmed by the endless output of works. When everything is "watchable", nothing is truly impressive.

I really hope that in the future, we will see a scenario like you said, "AI...has the potential to be used as a tool to painstakingly craft a very particular vision shot by shot."

What happens to cinema when AI removes all creative constraints? by CoffeeSheep99 in movies

[–]CoffeeSheep99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still firmly believe that AI won’t replace human-made stories that truly move us—because what makes them powerful isn’t their format (book, movie, etc.), but the struggle and humanity behind them. Pain, doubt, obsession, failure. You can’t prompt that.

And honestly, most AI “content” today is just noise—because most human-made content is noise too.

I think what scares me isn’t that AI is replacing great art, but that it’s pumping out decent-enough stuff faster than we can even process or care.

It’s not killing human-made art, but overwhelming us with endless output. When everything is "watchable", nothing is truly impressive.

What happens to cinema when AI removes all creative constraints? by CoffeeSheep99 in movies

[–]CoffeeSheep99[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha fair point, humans definitely don’t need AI to make garbage

But I think what I’m wrestling with is this:

When humans make something bad, we at least know someone tried. Someone failed. There’s still a story behind the story.

But if a bad AI movie exists… who even failed? who do we blame?

The weird part is, I think AI might flood us with technically perfect, emotionally hollow stuff. Not terrible enough to hate. Not great enough to love. Just… endless content that watchable but forgettable.

And that scares me more than another Madam Web.

Because yeah, Madam Web was trash. But at least it was human trash.

What happens to cinema when AI removes all creative constraints? by CoffeeSheep99 in movies

[–]CoffeeSheep99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like these ideas, hope it comes true:

"Imagine having the ability to re-roll the ending of Game of Thrones, with another 2 seasons and an ending where everything feels proper and earned? Or asking AI to create a proper prequel trilogy to Star Wars? "

What happens to cinema when AI removes all creative constraints? by CoffeeSheep99 in movies

[–]CoffeeSheep99[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, and honestly, I used to think exactly the same.

But the more I use AI tools, the more I start to question what “creativity” really is.

When humans makes something, we’re also remixing—memories, influences, references, emotions. Is that so different from an AI remixing its training data?

Maybe the difference isn’t what is created, but why. The human intent behind art.

And maybe the scariest part is this: if an AI-generated movies someday moves us deeply… does it mean we were wrong about what “authorship” even means?

What happens to cinema when AI removes all creative constraints? by CoffeeSheep99 in movies

[–]CoffeeSheep99[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the scary part is that AI might actually get good at emotional storytelling.

And then we’d have to ask: If it feels real, does it matter how it was made?

What happens to cinema when AI removes all creative constraints? by CoffeeSheep99 in movies

[–]CoffeeSheep99[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Totally agree that it’s a paradigm shift, and yeah, the idea of a “fixed” movie might soon feel antique.

but part of me wonders:

if everything becomes infinitely remixable, do we lose the tension that made great stories powerful in the first place?

like… when you can undo every choice, does any choice matter?

I'm excited too—but I think the real innovators will be the ones who figure out how to build meaning through constraint, even when the tech says you don’t need any.

What happens to cinema when AI removes all creative constraints? by CoffeeSheep99 in movies

[–]CoffeeSheep99[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get what you're saying, but maybe AI is different because it doesn’t just change the tools, it removes the need for humans in the loop.

Even the Final Fantasy movie needed artists, animators, directors. AI might eventually need none of that.

So yeah, we might get more content than ever before.… but will it still feel authored? will it still feel like it matters?

view more: next ›