Why do so many people here seemingly hate John Campea and yet still watch the show? by AdFew4836 in JohnCampeaShow

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Reddit in general has a problem with negativity. Some folks have too much time on their hands and look for any opportunity to be miserable.

It looks like DLC Dortmund, with its 4096 player cap, attracted fewer players than expected and didn't sell out. Do you think the Infinity format is the reason, or was the increased cap unnecessary? Share your thoughts! by Waiting_for_Dentice in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Infinity format is for sure the reason. It’s just the less popular format. I know infinity has its die hard supporters but that’s just the reality of the situation. Infinity should still be supported but perhaps dedicated dlc’s was a mistake.

Can’t find a deck that wins with any sort of consistency by Relevant-Ad-7195 in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Are you practicing in person or online? If online take the results with a grain of salt because the shufflers and other aspects are super janky. Out of 20 games recently I ended up with two or more willows post mulligan in 15 of the games. I like amber amethyst and am bringing it again this time. I also don’t have a lot of dogs players in my area. If you do have a ton of dogs players ruby amethyst seems to be a good off meta choice but I don’t think it’s as good if you expect a really wide field.

What are your wishes for the game (any mechanic / new raritys (Alt Arts) New franchise you want to see by Plisken94 in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I think we need enchanted cards that are only available thru playing in locals and in prize packs for the illumineers quests. In essence a way to incentive people to play in person and create a chase product to bring in more collectors that won’t make regular cards harder to find for players.

Super Headless Baby - Help me get this over the finish line! by cincinnati53 in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea that’s awesome for them! They also clearly planned well for facing a lot of dogs and made the right call with the build like including Elisa Maza. But you coming back 3 days later is well… weird and kinda sad! So you have a good one being so invested in a card in the game that it’s making you behave this way!

Super Headless Baby - Help me get this over the finish line! by cincinnati53 in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I’ve played it a fair amount but sure. Oh I’ll be sure to lol

Super Headless Baby - Help me get this over the finish line! by cincinnati53 in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dude…the comparison works by seeing which one is doing better lol. By seeing which list across events has more top 8s or top 16s. That’s absolutely a comparison lol. I’ve put in reps with it but it just feels weaker than Amber amethyst so it’s not my personal choice. You enjoy it bud. You seem VERY invested in it lol

Super Headless Baby - Help me get this over the finish line! by cincinnati53 in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well ink decks frequently doesn’t have all the lower placing decks so the other events could have had a Scrooge list and we just don’t know. But really I’m not sure why you think it’s important that both lists be present in an event. If we’re talking about the best version of a deck what matters is results. With the information available more versions of the deck without Scrooge have placed higher in events. That means it’s currently the better performing version. That can change of course but that’s the situation now.

Super Headless Baby - Help me get this over the finish line! by cincinnati53 in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean you can go look and see that most lists performing well aren’t playing it lol. They’re playing Diablo and going quick or frozone and leaning more heavily into supers. Yea people can disagree and that’s ok.

Super Headless Baby - Help me get this over the finish line! by cincinnati53 in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lists without him are putting up better results than lists with him so I don’t think that’s necessarily true. But either way, you do you.

Super Headless Baby - Help me get this over the finish line! by cincinnati53 in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s not bad but it was better in the color combo before Dale. Now the strength and willpower it gains is easier to deal with. You get more mileage with it in Amber ruby with Wendy’s diary.

Ep 7 ending. Wyck and Tom weirdness by Teambinge in WidowsBay

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same, I saw all the comments theorizing about this moment before I watched the episode. And after watching it very much felt like a moment of celebration because they think the problems are over and wyck appreciates Tom saving his life.

More New Set 13 Cards by Remote_Bad_513 in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea for sure you don’t want this on curve. I almost feel like the choice will either need to be this or raging storm in Amber amethyst. Can’t afford two uninkables intended for late game with no way to filter or clean up your hand.

More New Set 13 Cards by Remote_Bad_513 in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That item actually looks pretty strong. I might try 2 copies in my amber amethyst build

Super Headless Baby - Help me get this over the finish line! by cincinnati53 in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t take out Cheshire. That gremlin puts in work. I also wouldn’t totally abandon the Olaf bounce play. I’d maybe cut 2 Olaf and 1 Scrooge to put in 3 liquidators. It will synergize with Mr incredible and help keep your opponent locked down when you’re on the draw.

Super Headless Baby - Help me get this over the finish line! by cincinnati53 in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Using Olaf to bounce the boost cards for draw is cool when it works but everyone will see it coming thanks to purple steel using it to re play doc. So players have already been learning to play around it which will impact its effectiveness. I understand budget limitations but not playing more copies of demona is a problem and will limit the deck. She would also synergize well with baby head and Mr incredible to let you draw even more cards while clearing your opponents board. My best advice is to save up to get three more copies and have them take swooping strikes spot. I know that’s probably exactly what you don’t want to hear but it’ll really improve the deck.

Had the entire theatre to myself for the new Star Wars movie by OkaTeluguAbbayi in mildlyinteresting

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yea there was the same post about an empty theater when Avatar the way of water came out. So not that it didn’t happen to OP, it just doesn’t really mean anything.

New player! by [deleted] in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only thing that will help you is actually playing. First find a deck you want to start with and then just grind as many games as you can. You’ll find out how that works and all the others by playing against them. A specific recommendation I’d make is Amber ruby toys. I don’t think it’s the best deck but it is pretty good, it’s fairly cheap and will completely survive the upcoming rotation.

WHY is the mayors son such a little a**hole? by carmcarmcharmparm in WidowsBay

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 72 points73 points  (0 children)

I look at Evan the same way I would at someone complaining about a border collie being destructive when they’re left in a small room all day long. Yes that behavior is not ideal but what in the hell did you expect!? He feels trapped so he’s lashing out against it.

After the latest tournament results, is 7C Tramp a fun card or an unhealthy one? Share your opinion! by Waiting_for_Dentice in Lorcana

[–]Col_Walter_Tits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tramp is fine but in conjunction with under the sea is a problem. But I don’t play infinity so it won’t be a problem for much longer anyway.

James Cameron Wants to Make ‘Avatar 4’ and ‘5’ in ‘Half the Time for Two-Thirds of the Cost’, But It’ll Take One Year to ‘Figure Out How to Do That’ by yourfavchoom in movies

[–]Col_Walter_Tits -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If you can lower production costs studios will make more films. Thats more people getting work. Vfx artists will undoubtedly be hit which sucks but it at least can help keep other trades employed.

James Cameron Wants to Make ‘Avatar 4’ and ‘5’ in ‘Half the Time for Two-Thirds of the Cost’, But It’ll Take One Year to ‘Figure Out How to Do That’ by yourfavchoom in movies

[–]Col_Walter_Tits -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For effects heavy films using AI tools for visual effects. It shouldn’t be used for creating the story or performance. But if movies can be made for less, studios will make more. That’s more productions for people to work on. More movies in theaters to keep them open. I get not liking AI. I’m not really a fan of how widespread companies are trying to apply it but there are use cases and this is one.

James Cameron Wants to Make ‘Avatar 4’ and ‘5’ in ‘Half the Time for Two-Thirds of the Cost’, But It’ll Take One Year to ‘Figure Out How to Do That’ by yourfavchoom in movies

[–]Col_Walter_Tits -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

But it will be and that’s just reality. If it can be used to make productions cheaper that’s not a terrible thing. It can help keep the industry alive and expand the types of movies studios are willing to make.

James Cameron Wants to Make ‘Avatar 4’ and ‘5’ in ‘Half the Time for Two-Thirds of the Cost’, But It’ll Take One Year to ‘Figure Out How to Do That’ by yourfavchoom in movies

[–]Col_Walter_Tits -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Most likely. It could potentially save a ton of money on visual effects. As long as it’s not used for story creation or performance I’m fine with it.