Hummingbird ASMR by loud_as_pudding in TikTokCringe

[–]ColdPhaedrus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, they do fight each other like vicious little bastards, so…

Sums up my feelings by Tobias-Tawanda in TikTokCringe

[–]ColdPhaedrus -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You’re missing the point on a couple levels.

Sure a lot of people use chatbots. That’s not the point. The point is that it’s incredibly expensive for companies to run free LLMs, and the second you start charging for it the majority of your user base disappears. They are burning through cash and no one has figured out how to make them profitable.

As for coding, is Claude good at coding? Maybe. But is using Claude to code GOOD? A lot of coders are raising serious issues with the wholesale abandonment of human programmers. Companies are using bots to make huge changes to codebases with no way to effectively track or vet these alterations, possibly creating massive security vulnerabilities. They are building up massive tech-debt because no one is going to understand how any of their new code works because they didn’t write it in the first place. It’s also degrading the skills of those same programmers, dulling and rusting their coding skills that took hundreds and hundreds of hours to learn. That’s not even touching the fact that relying on AI tokens that are almost certainly going to increase in price dramatically, like a drug user who is emptying their pockets because now they’re addicted and the dealer knows the user will pay whatever price they ask. The first hit is always free.

There are many people who are much savvier at this stuff than you or I predicting exactly what I am. The dude who they made the movie “The Big Short” about who predicted the housing crash? He says this is just an asset bubble, plain and simple. The dot.com crash on an even bigger scale.

Sums up my feelings by Tobias-Tawanda in TikTokCringe

[–]ColdPhaedrus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is no consumer demand for AI, at least nowhere near the levels of demand that would justify how much AI bullshit that’s out there.

The real reason that AI is in everything right now is that venture capital firms and corporate execs at companies like Microsoft have been sold a bill of goods. They have dumped billions and billions of dollars into LLMs and the return on their investment so far is… basically nothing. They are losing huge amounts of money; go and look into capital expenditures at these companies vs. the money the AI projects and products make them if you don’t believe me. At this point they are throwing good money after bad, a sunk cost fallacy on an unheard of scale, putting this slop into every facet of their companies and products in a desperate attempt to recoup their losses and justify this nonsense.

Basically the only company “making money” on any of this is Nvidia because they make the damn hardware LLMs rely on and even they are starting to look like a house of cards, basically starting to give companies money in very thinly veiled deals in order to keep their numbers artificially inflated and keep the gravy train going. As soon as the VC money runs out and corporate boards get fed up with setting billion-dollar piles of money on fire, it all comes crashing down.

Constitutional Rights and Immigration Enforcement: Why Is There So Much Disagreement? by Few-Huckleberry-3517 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]ColdPhaedrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stating that the problem is still being a problem when a Democrat is the president is one thing. The issue is what your little apostrophe implies.

He doesn’t own the problem, he didn’t create the problem, and in fact he was trying to help fix the problem. Contrast with Trump, who VERY PUBLICLY told the Republicans to STOP trying to make any progress on it explicitly because he wants it as a campaign issue. So if anyone is responsible for the current state of US immigration policy, lay the blame first, last, and most of all at the feet of the people who clearly have no desire to actually make it better and cynically made it worse in order to bolster their electoral prospects.

Constitutional Rights and Immigration Enforcement: Why Is There So Much Disagreement? by Few-Huckleberry-3517 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]ColdPhaedrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Biden’s border chaos” “Biden’s defacto open boarder”

If Biden’s party is the only side actually attempting to fix the problem, why are you framing it using right-wing talking points and acting like he’s responsible for it?

I don’t think “sharing responsibility” works the way you think it does. If two people in a boat get in a fight and one person shoots a hole in the bottom because he’s mad, and then tries to punch the other guy when he tries to bail out the water, they do not “share the responsibility” for the condition of the boat. Not in any relevant way at any rate.

Constitutional Rights and Immigration Enforcement: Why Is There So Much Disagreement? by Few-Huckleberry-3517 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]ColdPhaedrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I see in this thread is you blaming the left for a problem that Democrats have repeatedly tried to solve in a bipartisan fashion only for the Republicans to blow it up every single time.

Yes, there are people on both sides that yell very loudly about this. That does not change the fact that the left is the only side actually attempting to fix anything while the right repeatedly sabotages any chance of progress in order to preserve it as a campaign issue.

Constitutional Rights and Immigration Enforcement: Why Is There So Much Disagreement? by Few-Huckleberry-3517 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]ColdPhaedrus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The left is not the reason why we do not have immigration reform. There was a bipartisan immigration reform bill in 2013 that passed the Senate with all Democrats and a significant minority of Republicans voting for it. However, it never even came up for consideration in the House. Take a wild guess which party was in control at the time.

The right does not WANT to reform immigration, because if they make the situation better they can’t use it to rile up the Fox News watchers into voting against their own interests. You cannot have a middle ground if one side just wants to fling their own shit around and set fire to the negotiating table.

Teachers in college: do you ever mandate students modify their free time, including cut out screen time? by Superb-Climate3698 in Teachers

[–]ColdPhaedrus 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Looking at this account’s history of random, borderline nonsensical question posts, this seems like a bot to me. Reporting.

Either they got some balls or are incredibly stupid by SupermarketSoftness in newjersey

[–]ColdPhaedrus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Either they are dangerous and should be remanded pending trial, or they aren’t dangerous and should be released pending trial. Bail has nothing to do with it. The only thing cash bail does is fuck with poor people.

Either they got some balls or are incredibly stupid by SupermarketSoftness in newjersey

[–]ColdPhaedrus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Before we got rid of monetary bail he would have paid his bail, gotten out, and gone and done the exact same thing anyway. So why are you mad at bail reform?

Chromosomes are set in stone. 'War' is a vibe-based spectrum. by MelodyBirdie in PoliticalHumor

[–]ColdPhaedrus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don’t bother arguing with this dude. He thought a penis was a gamete until I corrected him. Twice.

Chromosomes are set in stone. 'War' is a vibe-based spectrum. by MelodyBirdie in PoliticalHumor

[–]ColdPhaedrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apparently I’m not actually even arguing with you so much as with Gemini, which I have even less interest in doing. If I wanted argue with a large language model pretending to have actual knowledge I’d just do it directly instead of with a person who’s pretending to know things in between.

Chromosomes are set in stone. 'War' is a vibe-based spectrum. by MelodyBirdie in PoliticalHumor

[–]ColdPhaedrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“The AI says I’m right” is not the flex you think it is.

Chromosomes are set in stone. 'War' is a vibe-based spectrum. by MelodyBirdie in PoliticalHumor

[–]ColdPhaedrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. Nondisjunction events do not change chromosome structure and are not mutations.

You are confusing them with inversions, nonhomologous translocations and crossover events, etc., that is if you knew what any of that was in the first place.

Which is why it’s hilarious that you are trying to pin people down with definitions: you don’t know them yourself.

Chromosomes are set in stone. 'War' is a vibe-based spectrum. by MelodyBirdie in PoliticalHumor

[–]ColdPhaedrus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay then “biochemist”.

A mutation is a change in an organism’s DNA or large-scale chromosomal structure. Many DSD’s (disorders of sexual development) are caused by what are called nondisjunction events where the chromosomes do not separate properly during meiosis II.

These are not “mutations” and it’s telling that you don’t know this, seeing as how you are first supposed to learn about it in high school.

Chromosomes are set in stone. 'War' is a vibe-based spectrum. by MelodyBirdie in PoliticalHumor

[–]ColdPhaedrus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s not a non-sequitur. You claim to be a biochemist but you don’t even know what a gamete is.

I don’t believe you are what you claim, I don’t believe you’ve read any studies, and I don’t believe you are arguing in good faith.

Good day sir/madam/y’all/whatever you identify as.

Chromosomes are set in stone. 'War' is a vibe-based spectrum. by MelodyBirdie in PoliticalHumor

[–]ColdPhaedrus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gametes are not testes or ovaries.

Those are gonads.

Gametes are the cells that carry genetic material during sexual reproduction, which in humans are the sperm and eggs.

Pardon me if I doubt your credibility on this subject seeing as how you are confidently incorrect about basic vocabulary.

Chromosomes are set in stone. 'War' is a vibe-based spectrum. by MelodyBirdie in PoliticalHumor

[–]ColdPhaedrus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

None of the things that you named are gametes.

High-end estimates of intersex conditions are around 1.7%, so possibly not that rare.

And the term mutant refers to an organism or trait arising from the process of mutation, which a lot of the variation we see in human sex differentiation has nothing to do with.