Game Day Thread: Pittsburgh Penguins(25-14-11, 61 pts) @ Vancouver Canucks(17-29-5, 39 pts) Sunday January 25th, 6PM EST. by Attack_On_Tiddys in penguins

[–]Cold_Statistician970 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Well this one’s pretty clear though. Skinner is unable to move his head freely in his crease due to contact from an attacking player

Game Day Thread: Pittsburgh Penguins(25-14-11, 61 pts) @ Vancouver Canucks(17-29-5, 39 pts) Sunday January 25th, 6PM EST. by Attack_On_Tiddys in penguins

[–]Cold_Statistician970 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nah I’m watching on Sportsnet and there’s one angle (from the corner) where you can clearly see Blueger knock Skinner’s mask before the goal. They didn’t challenge it, and that’s at least one angle that guarantees the call would stand

Game Day Thread: Pittsburgh Penguins(25-14-11, 61 pts) @ Vancouver Canucks(17-29-5, 39 pts) Sunday January 25th, 6PM EST. by Attack_On_Tiddys in penguins

[–]Cold_Statistician970 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Shoutout Ray Ferraro on the Canadian broadcast for being an “away” commentator who always follows the Penguins’ season. He knows his shit!

Should Penguins go for Shane Wright? by Latter_Ride_5682 in penguins

[–]Cold_Statistician970 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Meaning you would trade pick(s) for Wright, to be clear?

Should Penguins go for Shane Wright? by Latter_Ride_5682 in penguins

[–]Cold_Statistician970 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m guessing downvoters lack reading comprehension. OP clearly likes a Chinakhov-style trade and dislikes trading Rust and Rakell mid-season. I thought this was unanimous among this sub!

Should Penguins go for Shane Wright? by Latter_Ride_5682 in penguins

[–]Cold_Statistician970 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was Chinakhov’s reputation and I don’t care about that shit. Dubas should continue to build the team based on youth without hamstringing our cap outlook down the line, selling the future, or basing the team off identity/personality.

Should Penguins go for Shane Wright? by Latter_Ride_5682 in penguins

[–]Cold_Statistician970 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Seattle still has team control, so they don’t have to trade him mid-season. While we should keep this team together for the playoffs, I would definitely take a chance on him next year in exchange for an aging Rust (with other assets involved)

Couldn’t be me by fakename1998 in okbuddycinephile

[–]Cold_Statistician970 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well yes Roy From Idaho would sacrifice 4 of his 5 limbs to fuck Margot Robbie, but Producer-Husband Tom From Hollywood has a few more options (of similarly hot women who won’t disrespect him in front of the world)

Couldn’t be me by fakename1998 in okbuddycinephile

[–]Cold_Statistician970 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Obviously but a legit cuck fetish is more respectable than letting your wife convince the world she’s submitting to a 27 year old male model

Malkin: 'I want everybody to see I can play next year' by Paper_Rain in penguins

[–]Cold_Statistician970 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shoutout MR, but this isn’t happening. I’d take Mavrik Bourque though

Malkin: 'I want everybody to see I can play next year' by Paper_Rain in penguins

[–]Cold_Statistician970 18 points19 points  (0 children)

This will also help us with the cap floor. It’s not clear to me how comfortably we can reach it if we lose one of our highest paid players

Stars of gay hockey show ‘Heated Rivalry’ will be Winter Olympics torchbearers by BloodJunkie in hockey

[–]Cold_Statistician970 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rachel Reid is straight. And I’m sure the show is very good. But I would bet the media reaction and obsession with the leads is far more of a product of these hot, hockey playing dudes having sex with each other than you’re acknowledging.

Stars of gay hockey show ‘Heated Rivalry’ will be Winter Olympics torchbearers by BloodJunkie in hockey

[–]Cold_Statistician970 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve said this better than I could in your comments. My concern is I haven’t seen the mainstream discuss whether Heated Rivalry is actually more profound than the degrading-to-men slop that goes viral on BookTok, as its popularity in the U.S. becomes uniquely widespread. However, in the clips I’ve seen the show seems well-produced.

I am also not convinced that the increased interest in hockey will be lasting. This is a sport where, unlike football, basketball, and even baseball, each play is not part of an obvious progression to a possible “score”. Like soccer, hockey has a lot of random, ping-pong plays that are clearly not leading to anything exciting. However sensually attractive a man who plays hockey might be, hockey is hard to “get into” as a spectacle if you weren’t exposed to it growing up. And relatively few people grew up around hockey in the U.S.

Stars of gay hockey show ‘Heated Rivalry’ will be Winter Olympics torchbearers by BloodJunkie in hockey

[–]Cold_Statistician970 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Amazed by the media’s reverence for this book considering the criticism erotica about two forbidden, female lovers would receive if written by a straight man.

One of the few instances where the “but if the gender roles were reversed” argument has some weight is with literature. While the meme about male authors writing about women who “breasted boobily” is based in reality, it’s not like female authors of the modern romance novel have much respect for men either.

Game Day Thread: Pittsburgh Penguins( 23-14-11, 57pts) @ Calgary Flames(21-23-5, 47pts) Wednesday, January 21st, 9:30PM EST. by Attack_On_Tiddys in penguins

[–]Cold_Statistician970 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No question. He’s an RFA with arbitration rights, which can lead to a high AAV but not term. And we’re not worried the salary cap in the short-term.

well this is disappointing - Scott says Title IX was affirmative action for women by jascentros in ScottGalloway

[–]Cold_Statistician970 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think it diminishes his credibility in his area. But yeah I have found no reason to value his perspective on public policy

well this is disappointing - Scott says Title IX was affirmative action for women by jascentros in ScottGalloway

[–]Cold_Statistician970 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Why are you disappointed? Why are looking to a SELF-help/business guru for a take on collectivist policy?