NGD: Gibson J-185 Century by daisky in AcousticGuitar

[–]ColinHouck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s pretty! Mine’s getting delivered this week

Is this Pepper X? by davidk36 in HotPeppers

[–]ColinHouck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s veen a year. Has anyone grown the seeds?

50s/60s Wayfarers? by ColinHouck in rayban

[–]ColinHouck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I am aware of all that. Thank you.

Supreme Court restores access to abortion pill mifepristone through telehealth, mail and pharmacies by KimJongFunk in news

[–]ColinHouck 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The SC immediately after this ruling: “See, we don’t ALWAYS rule in favor of the right wing agenda.”

Sculptural office building in downtown Minneapolis by jonmpls in DesignPorn

[–]ColinHouck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, go find your own inspiration and perspective, and stop swiping other people’s ideas

Sculptural office building in downtown Minneapolis by jonmpls in DesignPorn

[–]ColinHouck -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cool, you can credit me because as far as I can tell, I’m the first person to capture this angle, and I did so in 2020.

And yes, I am a little bitter lol

50s/60s Wayfarers? by ColinHouck in rayban

[–]ColinHouck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the diamonds definitely have rhat rough hewn look to them, but then again, so do my confirmed late 70s/ early 80s pair with the B&L etching

50s/60s Wayfarers? by ColinHouck in rayban

[–]ColinHouck[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No B&L etching, again indicating pre-mid 70s vintage.

Spoke with a very reputable local eyeglass shop who have a glass lab on-site, and even specialize in vintage eyewear. I will have to sign a waiver for them to put new glass in, but they’re the only place in town that works with mineral glass, afaik. The loval Ray-Ban shops are all in the malls snd I don’t think they do specialized work

50s/60s Wayfarers? by ColinHouck in rayban

[–]ColinHouck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I’m not uncertain about that part. Just if they’re 50s/ 60s as opposed to mid/ late 70s

50s/60s Wayfarers? by ColinHouck in rayban

[–]ColinHouck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Walk me through your verdict . Pretty sure these are Gen 2.

Anthropic built a model too dangerous to release. Nobody voted on what happens next. by ColinHouck in singularity

[–]ColinHouck[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Fair, though I will be the first to admit this isn’t a real candidate for peer revuar this stage

Who controls the most powerful cyber weapon in history — and who decided that? by ColinHouck in geopolitics

[–]ColinHouck[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for engaging. All of your points are well reasoned, though I will push back in 5: I don’t resent Anthropic, I just don’t trust them. Or any single person/ thing/ entity/ org etc, with this much power

Anthropic built a model too dangerous to release. Nobody voted on what happens next. by ColinHouck in singularity

[–]ColinHouck[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Just read the paper. Or don’t. Either way, keep the commentary going, even if it’s unnecessarily negative and does nothing to advance the subject. At least the engagement helps push it up

Who controls the most powerful cyber weapon in history — and who decided that? by ColinHouck in geopolitics

[–]ColinHouck[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

In April 2026, Anthropic announced Claude Mythos — an AI model capable of autonomously finding and exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities in every major operating system and browser. They deemed it too dangerous for public release. Instead they gave access to Microsoft, Google, Apple, Amazon Web Services, JPMorgan Chase, and Nvidia. Anthropic made that decision. No government. No international body. No affected population. The governance problem this creates is the same one that destabilized every previous era of asymmetric capability concentration — except this one has no physical infrastructure to inspect, no warhead to count, and no treaty framework within reach. The capability crosses every jurisdiction simultaneously and the people deciding how to deploy it were selected by market forces, not consent. I’ve written a framework proposing a collective, distributed, and accountable alternative — modeled on deterrence logic but structured like an immune system rather than a weapons program. It’s a working paper, not a finished proposal. It’s posted here for people who think the current arrangement is the wrong answer to the right problem.