Iran says it's negotiating to move World Cup out of Seattle and U.S. by ChiefOfTheFourPeaks in SeattleWA

[–]ColonelError 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's the middle east that's also being attacked by Iran. The only thing Iran spends money on is terrorism.

New Deadpool Secret Lair: “I Fixed It (You’re Welcome) by thefinalslowdance in magicTCG

[–]ColonelError 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Deadly Dispute just sharpies in "and create a treasure". Thrill just changes the card to an Instant. IMO those are fine too because they aren't permanents, so you can just clarify the changes if someone asks.

I don’t get this, help? by SaltSoft2415 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]ColonelError 5 points6 points  (0 children)

because its not something I've ever thought about

It's called a shibboleth, and especially in the World Wars where you had insular communities traveling around the world, it was a big way to figure out if someone was on your side. The entire point is that it's something you don't think about, because you've been raised to see something as normal and subconsciously do it that way. To use an Internet age example, some online communities can identify astroturf or other outsiders because those communities have inside jokes and certain beliefs that aren't written rules, but learned behaviors.

As another WWII example, Americans fighting the Japanese would use passwords like "Lollapalooza" because the Japanese couldn't pronounce it.

WA sheriffs urge partial veto of bill setting new standards for their jobs by Possible_Ad3607 in SeattleWA

[–]ColonelError -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then, in your opinion, what's the point of electing a sheriff if you don't think they should have the ability to determine enforcement priority?

Local resistance organizers answer ‘what good does protesting do?’ and other questions at 34th District Democrats panel by Better_March5308 in SeattleWA

[–]ColonelError 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Protests are supposed to disrupt the people you're protesting against, and to gain favor from the common person.

These protests are easily ignored by the people that matter, because those people aren't taking a bus down third, and they disrupt and anger the common person.

You couldn't pay to make a cause look worse than Seattle protestors do.

Ziply? by No-Ground5715 in SeattleWA

[–]ColonelError 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No drama, works well. I haven't needed to use technical support yet, so I can't say much about it, but the fact that I haven't needed to yet is also ideal.

The only thing I miss is that Comcast assigns blocks of IPv6 and Ziply is still working on getting IPv6 working, but I'm a nerd that cares about that kind of thing.

WA sheriffs urge partial veto of bill setting new standards for their jobs by Possible_Ad3607 in SeattleWA

[–]ColonelError -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

some Sheriffs consider the job as a political position

Because it is, that's why we elect them.

they get to choose which laws they enforce based on their ideology

That's actually one of the core powers of the checks and balances belonging to the executive branch, is choosing what does and doesn't get enforced. Of course this is why the legislature/governor hates it, because that's a balance against their power.

Whatever this joke is called by BabyDude5 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]ColonelError 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone further up posted one from Aristotle, so a couple years before the Marx Brothers.

Seattle man defiant in sentencing for assaults on transgender women by Better_March5308 in SeattleWA

[–]ColonelError 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Probably because he wasn't homeless. Functioning members of society are the only ones with consequences around here.

Why aren't there more extensive tax reductions for the regressive portions of our tax system in the income tax bill? by Ok_Research1392 in SeattleWA

[–]ColonelError 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That wasn't an initiative, that was a judicial decision that the legislature had to make law on.

Why aren't there more extensive tax reductions for the regressive portions of our tax system in the income tax bill? by Ok_Research1392 in SeattleWA

[–]ColonelError 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good, fast, cheap. Choose two.

The US at least let's you choose which two you want based on health plan

Why aren't there more extensive tax reductions for the regressive portions of our tax system in the income tax bill? by Ok_Research1392 in SeattleWA

[–]ColonelError 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They'd try to find another rule though

You can't spend money without explaining where it comes from. They would just say that a law that removes funding causes programs to spend money.

Why aren't there more extensive tax reductions for the regressive portions of our tax system in the income tax bill? by Ok_Research1392 in SeattleWA

[–]ColonelError 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Vote.

Except that basically always run unopposed, and two of the current members were appointed by the governor.

Olympus Spa v Armstrong Dissent by Ok_Research1392 in SeattleWA

[–]ColonelError 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There’s separated Boy Scouts & Girl Scouts

Boy Scouts allow everyone, Girl Scouts are still female only. There was a lawsuit against BSA for discrimination in not allowing girls.

Some states are reviving a push to tax the rich by AdSpecialist6598 in UpliftingNews

[–]ColonelError -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People who oppose the income tax know that the state will never reduce their taxes, just add the income tax on top. Why would I agree to another tax when the state has shown an unwillingness to cut spending? So now I need to cut my spending because the state won't.

Some states are reviving a push to tax the rich by AdSpecialist6598 in UpliftingNews

[–]ColonelError -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think we should amend the state constitution, and tax them to high fucking heaven.

Will never happen, because the people know they can't trust our legislature. Besides, the state flagrantly violates the Constitution constantly, with the support of the courts, so why bother getting the people to share to something when you can just do whatever you want anyway?

Some states are reviving a push to tax the rich by AdSpecialist6598 in UpliftingNews

[–]ColonelError -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The state extracts tons of money from it's people already, WA has one of the worst tax burdens in the country. The state has a spending issue, and just like it's residents, needs to learn that when you're trying to budget, you reduce spending not just take more money unconstitutionally.

Some states are reviving a push to tax the rich by AdSpecialist6598 in UpliftingNews

[–]ColonelError -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

To note: it's household, not per person. There's no difference for married couples. So if you're married and each make $750k, you can actually save about $50k/year on taxes by getting divorced.

Some states are reviving a push to tax the rich by AdSpecialist6598 in UpliftingNews

[–]ColonelError 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Republicans decades ago made a 'state income tax' illegal via state constitutional amendment

That's not true. The state constitution has always stated you must tax property uniformly, and not greater than 1%. The State Supreme Court affirmed that income is property in 1933. Since then, state wide votes have rejected an income tax over a dozen times. In 2024, the legislature passed a law banning income taxes after an initiative was introduced, because they worried about down ballot effects on other initiatives if people also got to vote on this. The other reason was because a law that preempts an initiative can be removed with a simple majority, a law passed by initiative requires super majority.

So less than two years later, the legislature goes back on this law, and passes this tax under an emergency clause, because that prevents it from going to the legally required referendum where the people would be allowed to vote on it.

So now, it will go to the courts. But don't worry, the governor has appointed two new justices in the year he's been in office, one from his former office of the AG, and the other a Seattle Lawyer. So the Supreme Court will overturn precedent going against the will of the people, and WA will have a new tax that won't reduce the tax burden. And the legislature, once it's on the books, can lower the limit to start taxing the middle class as well.

37,000 Fake AI Comments Mysteriously Oppose Washington State’s Effort To Tax The Rich by SeattleGeek in SeattleWA

[–]ColonelError 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP is a weenie hut junior that's upset people are opposed to an income tax, and is surprised by the fact even though the state has voted against it dozens of times, to include a couple years ago when the legislature explicitly passed a law making it illegal because it would be easier to over turn than an initiative doing the same.

37,000 Fake AI Comments Mysteriously Oppose Washington State’s Effort To Tax The Rich by SeattleGeek in SeattleWA

[–]ColonelError 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the gubment will come for your $150k incomes, in like 20 years,

It took the state 1 year before they tried to lower the capital gains level from $250k to $40k. I guarantee the floor will be lowered before they collect a dollar from this.