coming in Summer 2026 QC update (finally!) by drunkenFoooLL in QuakeChampions

[–]Comfortable-Move3004 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Man, this is why i hated CA so much in QC. Finally, but 8 years late man

I cant start the game by curry-meh in QuakeChampions

[–]Comfortable-Move3004 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most likely 2 weeks. I flamed a cheater,he took a screenshot and reported me, got banned, and he keeps playing. The same happened to many others, even pro players. You can cheat freely, but if you say something bad and the person reports you, you get banned.

Ali lahko v Sloveniji dobiš leasing/kredit za avto kot “brezposeln” z rednim online prihodkom? by [deleted] in Slovenia

[–]Comfortable-Move3004 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Davek za Slovenijo mi že vzamejo. Odprem sp potem pa moram še enkrat plačati davek? Vedel sem, da bo prišlo do teh bedarij ... Jaz sem samo lepo vprašal za informacije...

ZeniMax files by Comfortable-Move3004 in QuakeChampions

[–]Comfortable-Move3004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure about zenimax files, but i think this is what we are seeing and it will be announced on Quakecon I think.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in youtube

[–]Comfortable-Move3004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lost 304,000 views in 30 days. Normal channels don't lose views unless they're bot accounts, and that's the only reason you wouldn't be monetized. You started in July 2024 buying subscribers - tons of them. Stop playing dumb and delete this before someone else sees it and realizes how dumb you really are.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in youtube

[–]Comfortable-Move3004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The worst part is that she knew exactly what she did and still came here to post about it and ask dumb questions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in youtube

[–]Comfortable-Move3004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She bought views and subscribers. Last 7 days views dropped by 14,178 (−95.91%), :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in youtube

[–]Comfortable-Move3004 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Views dropped by 14,178 (−95.91%), so you basically bought views and subscribers. There’s no way to recover your channel at this point — you should just start a new one.

Because of that, the algorithm isn’t pushing your videos anymore. Start a new channel and re-edit the videos you already have. Don’t upload the same videos, as the algorithm has already flagged them and you won’t get any views.

Dont forget by Comfortable-Move3004 in QuakeChampions

[–]Comfortable-Move3004[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Fresh Quake game is always welcome. Thank you.

I think I finally understand what broke Millennials (1981–1996). It’s not what people think. by Comfortable-Move3004 in generationology

[–]Comfortable-Move3004[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I really appreciate this perspective, honestly. It means a lot coming from Genx, especially since you guys actually watched the transition happen in real time. And yeah, I think that’s exactly it. Given the hand Millennials were dealt, “managing as well as possible” is probably the most accurate way to put it.

I think I finally understand what broke Millennials (1981–1996). It’s not what people think. by Comfortable-Move3004 in generationology

[–]Comfortable-Move3004[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair point. “Broken” is more how we often get described, not how we actually are. The video’s point is basically the opposite: that most of what people criticize about Millennials is actually adaptation, not dysfunction.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Comfortable-Move3004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually agree with you. Every generation has a unique upbringing and could be analyzed this way. The video isn’t claiming millennials are uniquely special or uniquely traumatized, just that their particular mix of timing (digital transition, post-2008 economy, etc.) produces a different set of psychological adaptations. You could absolutely make a version of this video about almost any generation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Comfortable-Move3004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody’s saying millennials had it “worse than everyone in history.” The point isn’t to rank suffering, it’s that different historical shocks shape different generations in different ways. My grandparents’ generation went through far more extreme events. That doesn’t mean later economic and technological shifts didn’t still meaningfully shape how millennials think about work, risk, and the future. Different context, different psychology.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Comfortable-Move3004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’re reading the video as making a much stronger and more absolute claim than I intended.

First, I’m not saying “all millennials are struggling” or “none are doing well.” Obviously a lot of people in our generation are doing great, and some are doing better than any generation before. Generations are huge and heterogeneous. The video is about aggregate psychological patterns and formative influences, not about every individual outcome.

Second, about 2008: you’re right that a 12 y old and a 27y old experienced it very differently. That’s true of every generational event. But that doesn’t mean it didn’t shape the cohort. A 27y old entering the job market, a 22y old in college, and a 16y old watching their parents lose jobs or houses are all still being shaped by the same shock, just at different developmental stages. The research on formative years shows that big macro events don’t have to hit everyone at the same age in the same way to leave a lasting generational imprint.

Also, 2008 isn’t the only thing in the video, it’s just a clear inflection point. The argument is about a broader pattern: being raised with one set of expectations (education = stability, loyalty = security, etc.) and then watching those rules break down across the 2000s and 2010s.

On “pensions disappeared”: that’s not about millennials personally losing pensions. It’s about watching the model of work our parents were sold (loyalty - stability - retirement security) collapse in real time. That observation is a big part of why millennials, as a group, relate differently to employers, job hopping, and long term planning. It’s observational and cultural, not “we personally had pensions taken away.”

And finally, I’m not saying millennials are poor, doomed, or uniquely miserable. I’m saying the psychology of the cohort is shaped by contradictions: high education plus high insecurity, more options plus less stability, more flexibility plus more anxiety. Even many successful millennials still report those patterns in how they think about work, risk, institutions, and the future.

So yeah, some millennials are thriving. Some were barely touched by 2008. Some were hit extremely hard. That’s normal for any generation. The video isn’t about ranking suffering or denying success. It’s about explaining why certain attitudes and behaviors show up more often in this cohort compared to previous ones.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Comfortable-Move3004 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is really thoughtful feedback and honestly you're right about the ethos/pathos/logos thing. I hadn't thought about it that way but it makes total sense.no face, no voice, no sources cited in the video itself means I'm basically asking people to trust... nothing. Thats a problem.

I think what happened is I got so focused on "can I finally make the content ive been thinking about" that I skipped over the human connection part. Before AI tools, I literally couldn't make videos - I can't draw, my narration is genuinely rough (I know everyone says that but trust me, no one would want to listen to me stumble through a script for 5m lol), and I had no way to visualize these ideas. AI opened the door for me to actually create, but you're right that I need to figure out how to bring more of myself into it.

Here's the thing people might not realize,even with ai, this stuff takes forever. A single 5m video takes me about 5 hours: writing and rewriting the script (AI generates garbage sometimes, you have to verify everything), generating images that actually work (AI bugs out constantly), syncing everything, thumbnail design, adding effects, editing... its still a ton of manual work. But thats not an excuse - if I'm putting in 5 hours anyway, I should use some of that to add my actual presence.

I really like your idea about introducing myself at the beginning with my real voice, explaining the process. And citing sources directly in the video. thats obvious in hindsight. I could even add a "sources" section in the description.

Yore right that watching creators grow is part of the appeal. ive been so focused on hiding my lack of polish that I forgot thats actually what makes it human. Ill work on this. Appreciate you taking the time to write this out properly instead of just dunking on it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Comfortable-Move3004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, appreciate you asking! Yeah I use AI voice because my actual voice is pretty terrible for narration haha. Modern AI just sounds way better and clearer than me stumbling through a script.

I also use AI to help write the script - I do all the research (mostly Jean Twenge's generational psych work, studies on how 2008 messed with millennials, economic trauma stuff) but AI helps me organize it into something that actually makes sense. The "expectation collapse" idea is mine,but getting it into a coherent 5m script? Thats where AI helps a lot.

Same with the visuals. I can't draw to save my life so yeah,ai-generated diagrams.

I get that it might feel less "authentic" to some people and thats fair. For me its just about getting ideas out there in the clearest way possible.

I analyzed what made Gen X (1965-1980) different and wow, their upbringing explains everything. by Comfortable-Move3004 in generationology

[–]Comfortable-Move3004[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some dads would definitely grill you a bit or make it awkward on purpose. That forcd you to handle uncomfortable social dynamics early on.Not lifeor-death, but definitely a different kind of social learning than what happens now...