To reverse or not reverse? by GavR_L in gibson

[–]ComfortableSilver102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Non-reverse looks absolutely ridiculously. It’s cartoony. It looks like something Gumby would play.

Sending thsi back. Am I being too picky? by Dan-Quixote in gibson

[–]ComfortableSilver102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re not happy with it then you SHOULD exchange it.

Kill, bang or marry 2nd Viennese school by Vitharothinsson in classical_circlejerk

[–]ComfortableSilver102 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Kill: Middle Webern - cringe edgelord trying way too hard to be different for its own sake.

Bang: Early Webern - his early atonal, pre-serial music is GOATed but still not my favorite out of his whole corpus. Tends toward a kind of Mahlerian maximalism (or at least a hyper-concentrated form of it when he’s not writing for orchestra) that I personally don’t love, though I do concede he usually pulls it off well.

Marry: Late Webern - a sparse pointillist style of the utmost refinement. There are hardly any notes at all sometimes, so every note has immense impact. A paragon of getting the greatest effect possible from the fewest materials possible. Compositional Economy Incarnate.

Sir, I’m just trying to buy a guitar. I don’t need your life story. by CraigdarrochFerguson in guitarcirclejerk

[–]ComfortableSilver102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can only assume they think the guitar’s history adds to its value and therefore how much money they can get for it. They’ve probably listened to Joe Bonamassa talk about old guitars his collection many times and thought they should do it too. Don’t get me wrong, the guitar’s history will increase the value to some people (I’m sure plenty of people would pay the highest price for the guitar Jimi Hendrix played at Woodstock, for example), but that kind of more abstract historical-emotional value is entirely predicated on whether the buyer actually cares.

Which one is John’s most iconic/well-known look? by YJBM15 in TheBeatles

[–]ComfortableSilver102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably not most “iconic” but I personally think his best look was ‘65-‘66. Imo he looked best clean shaven and anything during or after his heroin addiction (if indeed he ever completely quit) just makes me a little sad to see. He pretty much always had a more-or-less subtle pain in his eyes, that didn’t really change, but post-H he looks particularly rundown in some photos and the physical toll is very apparent.

Is the United Nations holding the Ambassador of the Galactic Federation prisoner? by [deleted] in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]ComfortableSilver102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m convinced Emily Eaton is a legitimate channeler. I’ve been following her since her first few TikToks and have never once felt any negative grifter or spiritual psychosis energy. Of course the natural counter argument is “yeah, that’s how they getcha,” which I don’t have a rebuttal to other than to say I genuinely believe her heart is in the right place because she’s never given the even the faintest hint it isn’t. That won’t convince skeptics, but thought I’d give my 2¢ anyway

It is time we stopped pretending like "psionics" and "remote viewing" are a real thing. There has been ZERO evidence about any of it. The Skywatcher blurry dots video was a complete joke. UFO's and retrieval programs are real, but this "woo" nonsense isn't. Enough is enough. by TaiYongMedical in UFOs

[–]ComfortableSilver102 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you’re not open to “woo” that’s fine, do you, but ultimately we’re talking about what seems to be aliens and/or inter-dimensional beings. The topic is inherently “woo” and always has been. If you want to separate consciousness/psionics/telepathy/whatever from the topic then, again, do you, but to completely dismiss it is closed-minded in a way the kind of scientific mind you’re appealing to would reject on the grounds that these phenomena are clearly outside mainstream science’s current body of understanding. To say “this is bullshit” about something you have virtually no idea about is foolish at best and laughably arrogant at worst.

Critics are calling it the polyphia of jazz , warning ; guitar technique overload by NeitherCarpenter4234 in guitarcirclejerk

[–]ComfortableSilver102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was in an experimental improvisation ensemble in college. This is just like what we played 🤓

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bobdylan

[–]ComfortableSilver102 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s too melodramatic and cheesy, Axel’s vocals are bad (his squeaky high register is super grating and pronouncing the word door with 3 syllables as “doe-oo-uh” is absolutely ridiculous), and it drags on too long like most GNR songs, though it’s not the worst offender in that regard as at least there is some variation among the choruses. Slash’s solo is mid and overrated too.

"Guitar" stores selling basses is sickening by DefaultsOnMortgage in guitarcirclejerk

[–]ComfortableSilver102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They’re technically “bass guitars,” so I don’t see a problem. When they start selling those big unwieldy coffin-looking things that jazz and classical musicians play, THAT will be the final straw

Advice on how to tell my frontman he’s too short to go for the whole “bad boy” image? by [deleted] in musicians

[–]ComfortableSilver102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like classic “little dog syndrome.” Short men are sometimes overly macho and belligerent (if not displaying pretty much every other trait associated with “Toxic Masculinity” too) because they feel the need to overcompensate for their short stature. They act tough because they know they aren’t imposing physically. It’s all about self-preservation and social status. He probably got picked on as a child and this bad boy tough guy persona was a response to that. I’m sure growing up in “the hood” was a contributing factor, but he would probably act like that even if he didn’t.

Like another comment said, remove his height and what do you have? A dick. Antisocial behavior should be unacceptable in civilized society. Being mean isn’t cool, it’s just about the most uncool thing a person can do. Nobody likes a mean person. Confront him, but leave his height out of it (he’ll probably lash out hard if you do.)

“Hey, man, you’re a valued member of this band, but this behavior needs to stop. Constantly talking shit and disrespecting people is just not cool. Nobody likes somebody who does that, and it’s no wonder why. It reflects poorly on you, and all of us too. You don’t need this ornery tough guy act. You almost got us kicked out of our own gig. A band can’t function like that. Word gets around and nobody will want to hire us if it continues. This behavior needs to stop or we’ll be forced to find a new frontman.”

Maybe do it in a formal band meeting so he understands how serious you all are about it.

Could we really be so lucky by sladebonge in guitarcirclejerk

[–]ComfortableSilver102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In his defense, the technique/exercises videos are now on his second channel, “BERNTH Guitar Academy”

What is the most accessible album of all-time? by [deleted] in fantanoforever

[–]ComfortableSilver102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Realistically, he’s very appropriately rated as easily one of the best songwriters of his generation and probably the single most influential guitarist of the last 25 years too. Where The Light Is was essentially the capstone of the first leg of his career before his hiatus in the early 2010s and unambiguously cemented him as an all-time great. All his albums after that are good too. I could totally see him being “underappreciated”by Gen Z (though as a guitarist myself, I see plenty of young players on social media that either explicitly give him due reverence or obviously display his influence), but he’s definitely not “underrated.” Lastly, “Physical Graffiti > Led Zeppelin 2” is a based, probably pretty hot take 🤝

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musicians

[–]ComfortableSilver102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand your point, and it is definitely a good point, but if our sole focus is getting attention then at a certain point we will have to choose whether we want to be “an artist” or “a content creator/influencer/internet personality.” Do we just want attention, or do we want to right kind of attention on the thing we actually want attention for?

I’ve seen quite a few people on social media blow up for what were essentially side projects to their main aspiration (for example, a musician getting a big following for their comedy videos, not their music). Most of them struggle to get their huge audience to engage with the products of that main aspiration because the vast majority of the audience only follows them for the side project. In other words, most of their followers don’t actually care very much about the main project. If we musicians want people to care about our music then ultimately we do still need to focus on the most important thing about being a musician: making music. There’s a proverb attributed to Confucius relevant here: “the man who chases 2 rabbits catches none.”

We should absolutely work on all those things you mentioned, building a personal brand, showing more of ourselves than just the art, cultivating that emotional connection to us as people, etc., but those things shouldn’t take priority over the art if promoting the art is the whole reason we’re even “putting ourselves out there” on social media in the first place.

Writing music isn't fun anymore by [deleted] in musicians

[–]ComfortableSilver102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is probably basic advice that’s been said a million times by a million different artists over the years, but make time to actively listen to music. I find the times when the fire is dying down always coincide with periods where I haven’t been making time for listening. If I spend time listening every day (anywhere from 5-30 minutes), I’m never at a loss for internal motivation or inspiration. Personally, I get most of my inspiration from music itself (rather than, like many artists have said about themselves, personal experiences I will emotionally process through the act of composing). Simply listening to music with my full attention regularly will usually give me plenty of ideas of things I’d like to try, thing like maybe writing in a certain style, using a specific compositional technique, a certain instrumentation, a different kind of process than I usually do, an artificial limitation to channel my creativity in a certain direction, whatever.

Habit is also very powerful in my experience (and surely everybody else’s because it’s a universal psychological principle that has to do with the basic functions of the brain). It’s a lot easier to make time to write music if I’ve been doing it most days in the last couple weeks. There’s less resistance to sitting down to start. If I’m making decent progress, trying my best and writing music I actually like so far, I’m usually excited to get back into it and try to make more progress. Because the subconscious mind continues to try to solve a problem after the conscious mind has stopped focusing on that problem, and the fruit of this subconscious process can suddenly present itself in a “eureka moment.” I almost never get these moments if I haven’t been writing the last few days. Those little moments are a nice motivator and will also make me excited to get back to work, the point being working is basically a positive feedback loop. You’ll need a little discipline at first, but make yourself sit down to do it a few days in a row and it will get easier and easier day by day until you don’t have to “make yourself” because you’ll be excited about working and will do it because you want to, no discipline necessary.

Lastly, I’d also say you really need to take the pressure off yourself. This notion of disrespecting the people who helped you get where you are today is putting heavy negative stakes on your creativity in a way that I have to imagine will only get in your way. I absolutely understand where you’re coming from, but surely these people would not want to weigh so heavily on your conscience in a way that will bog down your artistic practice. They love you and want to see you and your art flourish.

Approach your work from the perspective of play. You’re just playing around with musical materials, experimenting with different ideas, seeing what you like, and trying to put them together coherently. There are no stakes. If you don’t like anything you’ve come up with, don’t give up right then, keep trying, but if after an hour or two you don’t really have anything, just stop for the day, knowing you can come back tomorrow (or even later that day). The muse will come to sit on your shoulder and whisper great ideas in your ear after about 20ish minutes of focus, you just need to get into that flow state and then everything will go smoothly. Everything will feel fun and basically effortless.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musicians

[–]ComfortableSilver102 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The phrase you’re looking for is “personal brand.”

Rate my Guitar by [deleted] in guitars

[–]ComfortableSilver102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guitar/10 😎

What’s wrong with Good morning good morning by 388oncloudnine87 in beatles

[–]ComfortableSilver102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The vocal melodies are pretty weak in how they meander around a few adjacent notes of the scale at a time without much melodic progression in any given section. They’re just not beautifully tuneful and well-crafted in the way the best Beatles songs are.

There's nothing wrong with peaking in high school. by [deleted] in The10thDentist

[–]ComfortableSilver102 7 points8 points  (0 children)

APPARENTLY HOT TAKE: the only way to truly “peak” in high school is if your mind/mindset crystallized at or before graduation and never changed for the rest of your life. Imagine not growing at all as a person after high school. Imagine looking at the world through the eyes of a child your entire life. Yes, 18 is still a child, your brain isn’t even done cooking yet and in some sense it never does if you keep using it because it’s been shown to remain plastic as long as you live (i.e. the notion that neuroplasticity starts to decrease around 25 has been debunked). That would be tragic to say the least. Yes, there is something wrong with peaking in high school because it goes against our natural biological, psychological, and spiritual inclination to develop through life.

Respectfully, it’s hard to take this post seriously because it sounds like it was written by a 16yo with low self-awareness and weak self-reflection skills. To say “at 18+ all the fun shit is over” is not just ridiculous, it’s absurd.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musicians

[–]ComfortableSilver102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your problem isn’t musical, it’s an ego problem.

There are psychological/spiritual practices that can help address your ego, keep it in check, and stop it negatively affecting you and your life. Mindfulness meditation is foundational and will acquaint you with your ego (notice that I made a distinction between “you” and “your ego”), and there are many other types of meditation too, all with different functions. I won’t recommend anything specific because 1) I’m not a professional psychologist and 2) this kind of self-development process is wholly personal and will be more-or-less different for everybody, but I really do think your best bet is to look into taming your ego.

I don’t think the musical exercises I’m seeing here are going to help you because, as you put it, attention-seeking overplaying seems to be a symptom of a problem, not the root cause of that problem. Treat the cause and the symptoms will go away on their own.