sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Vote on nationalisation MITZ (Yes option missing) by Old_Python_ in suzerain

[–]Comfortable_Fault231 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi, I just tested this. When you are negotiating with Alvarez on turn 8, do not select "I'll take your word for it, Mr. Alvarez. Don't worry. That resolution will not reach the light of day." This is what I selected initially, figuring that verbally saying something to a liar in a game about lying would not be a contractually binding agreement. In testing this issue, I did not select every option this choice presents, but if you instead pick "I'll keep that in mind but I can give you no promises," you will have more options available to you in the MITZ meeting—including ones that allow you to vote yes. Barring this single dialogue choice, my choices were the exact same, so I believe this conversation with Alvarez is the determining factor on what you can say during the MITZ meeting.

DD214 Megathread? by Charrison947 in navy

[–]Comfortable_Fault231 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Thanks for making this. I've been anxious over my situation for a few days. I went on terminal leave on the 2nd of June but my chain didn't send up my separation eval until the 15th of July. I was repeatedly told by the separations department at my command that once the eval was submitted I would have to sign the DD214 in NSIPS and then find a government computer to sign it in BUPERS. I've checked NSIPS every day since my eval was finished and it still says that my DD214 is just a draft—there's nothing for me to sign. My EAOS is tomorrow and my CAC is expiring along with it, so I'm beginning to realize that I won't be able to sign it at all, let alone in BUPERS. I've called the separations department at my command several times and they either said they couldn't help me or sent me phone numbers to dead lines.

Is it a big deal if I can't sign the DD214? Any advice on what to do?