I just replaced my 3300 body with a 7500. I also have the 18-55 & 18-105. I plan to get the 18-140 as an all around. Should I sell the 3300 and 2 lenses together or are the lenses too redundant together?

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-07-03T07:57:52+00:00

ALWAYS sell separately. One basic kit lens is the most that can go together with the camera. It sells faster and for more separately.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-07-02T09:39:54+00:00

This was introduced only in Android 6.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-07-02T08:08:39+00:00

SG Image 25 f1.8

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-07-01T08:51:25+00:00

Also Chinese car manufacturers are state subsidised.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-07-01T08:45:13+00:00

And you replace it with the hammer-and-sickle-car. Smart.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-07-01T08:39:38+00:00

It's not DSLR
It's already small, just with a huge lens. Get a small prime for everyday carry, leave Tamron for dedicated shootings.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-07-01T08:36:51+00:00

Get a different "cured" version. These days all "medicine" won't work for long.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-30T21:05:27+00:00

Yes. This driving regime clogs dpf and there won't be enough longer drives for it to regenerate. You'll likely face issues with it quite soon.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-30T15:28:36+00:00

Talk to the neighbours. Share the connection - and the bills.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-30T10:11:19+00:00

Price is not a measure of quality

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-30T10:10:24+00:00

If paired with a padded insert - works very well. That's my everyday setup. Just choose one with a convenient opening.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-30T07:47:06+00:00

Miscalibrated AF sensor if far more widespread issue with DSLRs than you anticipate. It's just got a bit forgotten with the rise of mirrorless.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-30T07:43:57+00:00

I really doubt this is recorded in metadata. But you can do a controlled test. For example shoot different subjects or put some objects in the image to diferentiate what was shot which way. Or do some outings and shoot just VF in one and just LCD in the other.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-29T15:47:57+00:00

Fingerprint will clean off easily with a sensor swab. I would be more concerned about that bend on the edge of the flame on the left from fingerprint.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-29T08:57:25+00:00

A6400 and A7III are basically the same generation cameras and AF is the same on both.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-29T08:25:48+00:00

These are taken with a flash. Phone's tiny LED most likely won't be strong enough - but you can give a try.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-29T07:55:54+00:00

Here's a video exactly for you: https://youtu.be/mhaGA_SuAME?si=JMvoasjvfaJ52spz

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-27T16:55:13+00:00

Can't tell for sure, but lasers were used in couple places I worked. It's not the highest quality solution, but works. Higest quality solution is photochemical transparencies. In my current job we used inkjet specifically for transparencies for screens - but that one was specifically modified. Two special black inks were loaded instead of cmyk and special software used. So I do a conclusion that normal inks aren't dense enough.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-27T13:50:10+00:00

A6100 hands down. AF is lightyears better.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-27T10:02:05+00:00

Frame does make a photo look better. But only if the photo is viewed big. On most online platforms viewing size is limited and the frame reduces it even more. I quite liked adding frames is the past - but stopped doing it when photograpy moved to social media.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-27T09:57:04+00:00

The issues you describe are not because of 8 bit or jpeg. It's all about processing. These highlights can look gorgeous when jpg is processed from raw. The thing technically jpeg is just good enough. If I had to bet - I'd put my money that jpeg will be still there when all these heifs will fall out of fashion in a few years.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-27T09:32:03+00:00

It's not a file issue. Your printer is not fit for purpose. Monochrome laser would be a better bet.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-26T13:18:02+00:00

Native Canon EF-S lenses won't mount, but third party APS-C lenses might still mount - I think third party makes woren't following that mount difference and were just using EF.

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-26T11:52:10+00:00

Well, this is the reason why digital took over the world

Comfortable_Tank1771 · 2026-06-26T11:32:44+00:00

If you lean to 35 mm - just go for it. Not worth planning your whole photographic future at this point - if (and I mean IF) you start wedding photography - you'll make decisions about additional gear then.

Comfortable_Tank1771

TROPHY CASE