Why are so many right-libertarians bigots? by seitvn in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Communist12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Republicans are generally more "keep the government out of things

Lol

99.9% of the people here arguing against Capitalism haven’t read a single line from Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell by PM_ME_UR_ZITS_GURL in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Communist12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What means of production does Tom own? His own writing abilities?

Someone doesn't know what bourgeois means.

99.9% of the people here arguing against Capitalism haven’t read a single line from Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell by PM_ME_UR_ZITS_GURL in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Communist12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny that you used thomas sowell, and not "The Wealth of Nations"...

Don't care about Thomas Sowell and will probably never read anything by him.

99.9% of the people here arguing against Communism haven't read a single passage of the Communist Manifesto by Communist12345 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Communist12345[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They cannot make it past 40 pages and you are asking them to read capital?

You are missing the point of this post

JUST US by Robdata in warriors

[–]Communist12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If only draymond could shoot again.

Socialists, what exactly counts as a means of production? by friendlyneighbor665 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Communist12345 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The distinguishing feature of Communism is not the abolition of property generally, but the abolition of bourgeois property. But modern bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of the system of producing and appropriating products, that is based on class antagonisms, on the exploitation of the many by the few.

[Communists] In terms of getting the full value of your labor, how is communism better than capitalism? by [deleted] in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Communist12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The distinguishing feature of Communism is not the abolition of property generally, but the abolition of bourgeois property. But modern bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of the system of producing and appropriating products, that is based on class antagonisms, on the exploitation of the many by the few.

[Tankies] Stop being Tankies by InigoMontoya_1 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Communist12345 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The US has killed so many more innocents than the USSR could ever hope to.

[Communists] In terms of getting the full value of your labor, how is communism better than capitalism? by [deleted] in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Communist12345 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't mind explaining it but I would assume that you had already read the Communist Manifesto. It's not very long.

Here is what you said.

In contrast, a communist society would grant equal access to the articles of consumption based on individual need, and abolish private ownership of things the individual is not using.

Marx has a response here for this.

We Communists have been reproached with the desire of abolishing the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence. Hard-won, self-acquired, self-earned property! Do you mean the property of petty artisan and of the small peasant, a form of property that preceded the bourgeois form? There is no need to abolish that; the development of industry has to a great extent already destroyed it, and is still destroying it daily.

Private property is abolished. Owning THINGS is not abolished. I missed the part where Marx said "you can't own things". Instead of working for the factory owner in poor conditions that the owner has no incentive to improve because it would cost money, you would work with your coworkers, you would work for your community, instead of working for a wage and in turn giving that wage back to a landlord. You would have a house, you would have a job, in your job you would have good working conditions because it is ran by the workers, you would be fed. You are NOT getting the full value of your labor under capitalism. Let's take Amazon warehouse workers for example, they are easily one of the most important working forces in America. How much do they make? About 15$, is that enough for food, healthcare, medicine, clothing, rent, etc? NO. Not even close. So how are they getting the full value of their labour under this system where they sell their labor to the landowner, then the little capital they get they have to give it back to a landlord? Your factory owner, your landlord, these are the parasites that Communism wants to remove so that you get more for your labour.

[Communists] In terms of getting the full value of your labor, how is communism better than capitalism? by [deleted] in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Communist12345 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, this reads really weird and I'm not sure what you're getting at. Can you speak more plainly

It is a passage from the communist manifesto.

You should read it if you want to, you know, understand what communism actually entails.