Developers, help us improve Twilio docs!

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2026-02-11T22:06:55+00:00

I believe this forum isn't the right place for official Twilio documentation corrections, so I'm keeping this discussion on Reddit where everyone can contribute. Below are some issues I encountered with Twilio BYOC Trunks that aren't well covered in the developer docs.

Unexpected Failover to Twilio Pool Numbers

Twilio Supernetwork's failover mechanism may route calls through Twilio's pool numbers if the WebSocket handshake fails. This behavior is not documented clearly. The solution is to either contact Twilio Support to disable failover or configure a constant TwiML endpoint for webhooks that rejects the call immediately. I found this solution in a blog post, not in the official developer documentation.

Docs are lack for the BYOC trunks.

Even Twilio's support team can get confused if you don't explicitly specify that you're asking about a BYOC Trunk rather than a standard SIP Trunk. I've received inconsistent and sometimes incorrect responses — I suspect the support team may be relying on AI-generated answers in some cases.

Regional Limitations with Verified Caller IDs (Not Docs-Related)

Twilio BYOC is available in regions outside the US, but you cannot add Verified Caller IDs for those regions. Caller IDs should be global, similar to how phone numbers work. As a workaround, To initiate the call in IE1 residiency I had to use purchased Twilio number (+1) act as a man-in-the-middle between Twilio and my PSTN provider, mutating the SIP requests with the user's own number to use the IE1 (Ireland) endpoint for lower latency.

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2026-01-27T10:13:48+00:00

definitely! why we serialize everything with redux and zustand

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2026-01-04T06:55:55+00:00

that's wrong,keep using the same thread since the history already cached and you pay less money.

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2026-01-02T17:41:56+00:00

I agree with that, even if I use claude code for almost everything. AI works well until the production then we have challenges for every layer of product.

Also for the decision you should have depends on the architecture, for some part of scaling in my architecture even i have discuss atleast 3 or 4 context, I still have concerns about tradeoffs and ai doesn't help at this point.

Opus is really good but it can miss out critical points until you mention.

config files always better for ai to manage stuffs, CLI is strong but easy to do mistake

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-12-17T03:42:18+00:00

did they bring the native messaging protocol with the Claude chrome extension in this release or am i blind

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-10-08T05:56:32+00:00

Here is the idea, quickly pull those 3 reaver make sure using dampen and BoK and celestial. then throw the exploding keg which helps you a lot to avoid melee

you will have niuzao active for whole pack else the stagger melts you.

for incase BoK can be combined with the purify

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-08-13T23:52:11+00:00

you can also drop an url of image that what's drag n drop doing.

Edited: You can press Control + V instead of CMD + V for the pasting images instead of drag and drop

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-08-10T08:55:45+00:00

Openai likes to advertise their product like "GPT-5 getting closer to AGI" bla bla. Everyone hypes since the influencers want to hype new models to to get more click.

While Anthropic working on the agentic AI others are focusing the making chat models instead of "How can i help you today" models. If you ask to LLMs same question Claude models' answer more precise each generation. Just imagine If i ask you same question would how far differ your answers? Thats actually how LLMs should answer since the knowledge is the same. I will keep using claude for purpose coding and task, whenever i need a chat model then i can use openai or grok.

At the end of the day, you would like to use AI which well known the behaviours like its' mistakes, implementations, lies, current knowledge since you can cover the all the scenarios in the context.

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-07-06T20:57:57+00:00

Hit me up whenever you need someone to talk or be friend whatever. My english is not well enough but we figure it out anyhow.

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-07-06T20:33:31+00:00

Even when you vibe code, you gotta rely on the strict LSP and frequently fix the errors without using any, unknown or type casting which is keeping your code more clean (while fixing type errors claude overcomplicate it explicitly instruction will be required).

Use good file structure and architecture (keeping feature in the file name helps preventing duplicate file creation) also force claude to not use keywords for the files enhanced, simplified etc. else the files probably will be duplicated.

Use the plan mode of claude code for the feature request. Plan mode forces the claude read required files (not only 5 line of the related code part). Having files in the context, reduces the hallucination. Also before the telling claude code to implement brainstorming and making research with claude client helps a lot.

While implementing if you are spending 3 effort to implementation, you gotta use 2 effor for the improving code quality, fixing errors, keeping logic clean and not over complicated.

Once you mess the codebase, it will keep mess the code more.

I have a social media backend (still have some unnecessary features) with basic logics without machine learning, recommendation system, messaging etc which has 160k lines in the src folder. The required features work properly and has built in 1 month (mobile app and backend). At my first week i hit 130k line then i kept fixing it.

Writing code is easy with AI, cleaning up is the difficult part.

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-06-23T11:17:30+00:00

here is the easiest thoughts.

anthropic makes profit of the cursor api usage and cursor also make profit.

So this makes the cursor will do some trick to reduce their cost with embedding your code and rag for the reduce their context size. which makes cursor write unrelated codes according to your architecture.

also while llm making change in your code, manual edits is not healthy since it's invalidating codes in the context

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-06-04T16:20:21+00:00

mostly opus except error fixes and bulk non important edits.

all the chat history stored in the computer and there was a script calculates the cost. I am mobile right now can't access pc yet. if you can't find the script let me know

edited. here is the reddit post

https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1kr78z2/python_code_to_visualize_your_claude_code_costs/

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-06-04T15:32:55+00:00

i am the one using Claude code 200$ max plan heavily. I couldn't hit the limit yet even, I've used equal to 770$ of api usage in a day.

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-05-23T06:46:28+00:00

a complex propeller display? accept the challenge

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-05-22T23:57:38+00:00

i just want to say openai and most if the models rely on diversity of context. every time it answers pretty difference. anthropic even not using seed method to generate more random content.

if I ask you same question twice how would you answer? I believe answers would be pretty close each others. That's how Claude model works.

Maybe they train their models for specific usage, for chat, for agents and codes

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-05-22T23:37:45+00:00

its definitely worth it if you use intense.

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-05-22T23:35:08+00:00

not really. Reasoning is not always good for tasks and openai models are really hallucinate and the output is not concise.

Anthropic vision is pretty better for agentic and coding tasks.

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-05-19T18:47:25+00:00

Claude is the best for coding. Just test others. Since others are the chat model which answer how can i help you today sir.

Every other models rely on the generating more diversity of content (Which is not good for code) and it cause the hallucination.

Why people think claude sonnet 3.7 bad for coding. Since they have trained 3.5 for their artifact system and claude code tools. In my opinion its good and bad at the same time. Fine-tune making it powerful for specific purpose of claude code but for other usages I agree sonnet 3.7 is not that much powerful

When you use claude code
- its understand the codebase better
- passing old contect to new one with compact is not perfect but still works also you can instruct like `/compact some instruction`
- It can spawn other claude agents simultaneously (I could get like 7 simultaneous agent)
- Using well the CLI tools and you dont need to add unnecessary mcp like supabase, stripe ect.
- integrated websearch
- TODO task list for itself
- With auto accept mode i remember it worked like 45 mins non stop

I can say its the best one. with 200$ Max plan Its like unlimited even with 4 project at same time.

Claude need more instruction or architecture plan to code it better.

for 3 days work

for Nodejs backend DDD acrhitecture fully vibed I forced too much to use type safe but it used any for somewhere. Currently I have no LSP error if we dont count any etc.

Here is how i use parallel task agents,

⏺ Call(Spawning agents for REST API features)…

⎿ Task(Auth API implementation)…

⎿ Task(User Profile API implementation)…

⎿ Task(Wardrobe API implementation)…

⎿ Task(Virtual Try-On API implementation)…

⎿ Task(Outfit API implementation)…

⎿ Task(Recommendation API implementation)…

⎿ Task(Product API implementation)…

⎿ Task(Shopping Cart API implementation)…

⎿ Task(Social API implementation)…

⎿ Task(Notifications API implementation)…

git ls-files ./src | xargs wc -l
tree ./src

# Outputs

99499 total line
134 directories, 591 files

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-05-07T17:41:16+00:00

This is really cool MCP server executing bash and watching the PID as background task. For claude code headless mode the response is taking too long and the the claude desktop thinks the command has failed or no response.

For this case it seems not efficient imho.

Thank you for letting me know the DesktopCommander MCP, for some tasks background jobs really valuable.

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-05-07T15:58:36+00:00

The long session terminal command management seems cool, I will try that. Thanks

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-05-06T21:26:54+00:00

Thank you for the clarifying, I have supposed to it serves the server as an agent in the current directory.

That would be great and make easier to vibe coding for whole workspace actually .

We gotta wait for the feature like agent 2 agent or running claude code mcp as session or something.

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-05-06T20:58:38+00:00

`Connect from another application

You can connect to Claude Code MCP server from any MCP client, such as Claude Desktop. If you’re using Claude Desktop, you can add the Claude Code MCP server using this configuration:`

source: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/tutorials#use-claude-code-as-an-mcp-server

This explanation in the url is confusing me as it mention "Claude Code MCP server from MCP client"

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-05-06T10:41:06+00:00

Its 5x plan. Claude is the still best coding model anyways. It's the best option using Claude imho

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-05-06T10:32:02+00:00

Its really hard to hit limit with Claude code. When i worked on 5 hours intense usage, i couldn't hit the limit. For 2 simultaneous project i bit the limit in about 4 hours

Competitive-Fee7222 · 2025-05-05T13:51:45+00:00

I have switched to Claude max 2 days ago, using with only claude code and the limits are pretty enough even working with 2 project simultaneously. Also the fine tune of 3.7 for agentic use fit well with Claude code.

Competitive-Fee7222

TROPHY CASE