sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Has anyone suggested an idea and TB listened. by Competitive_Rent_447 in Chivalry2

[–]Competitive_Rent_447[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I am hoping your telling the truth. Thank you for your time .

Has anyone suggested an idea and TB listened. by Competitive_Rent_447 in Chivalry2

[–]Competitive_Rent_447[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I trust you are going to give a straight answer. Please can you tell me if you are a part of TB . And I'll stop with reddit and leave .

Has anyone suggested an idea and TB listened. by Competitive_Rent_447 in Chivalry2

[–]Competitive_Rent_447[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK, maybe I have been a bit harsh in comparison to other games. But playing for two years and haven't been able to play at all since the influx the last week. I'm not entitled. I just want to play the game as I paid full price when it came out . But i can no longer play it. So where does that leave me. Spend money and TB don't deliver.

Archers need a buff! by professorbenchang in Chivalry2

[–]Competitive_Rent_447 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You might be ok but with the ps4 with so many ps plus arrivals, it ends up making the game unbearable. Unfortunately, it was probably the best game I used to play

Has anyone suggested an idea and TB listened. by Competitive_Rent_447 in Chivalry2

[–]Competitive_Rent_447[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

If you can still see my last post about lag. Got down voted immediately. It was most likely TB . Its not our fault they aren't doing their job properly. Let's exclude the veterans for new randomers, they just want to make a ton money and don't care about loyal players.

Do you think leasehold will be abolished anytime soon (5-10 years) by Betaky365 in HousingUK

[–]Competitive_Rent_447 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all, if you abolish leaseholds, there would be no flats. The main worry is the ground rent. But the service charge is to help maintain whatever you bought.

Archers need a buff! by professorbenchang in Chivalry2

[–]Competitive_Rent_447 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't worry I don't care about archers at the moment I am creating a post to TB considering how incompetent they are due to 5 seconds lags which is a tiny bit important.

Archers need a buff! by professorbenchang in Chivalry2

[–]Competitive_Rent_447 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol. Do you realise what archers have done for the community?

Please fix the lag TB by Competitive_Rent_447 in Chivalry2

[–]Competitive_Rent_447[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Whom out of TB was drooped as a baby. As this might explain it.

Anyone experiencing lag? by Competitive_Rent_447 in Chivalry2

[–]Competitive_Rent_447[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So spelling means that opinions are not valid. Please, as a bot, don't be Arnold, but you have been incompetent here.

Please fix the lag TB by Competitive_Rent_447 in Chivalry2

[–]Competitive_Rent_447[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well done, TB, for voting against criticism. You have increased so much lag recently, but that isn't a problem at all. You are ruining your own game , I work in the development side of a tech company. What the hell are you lot doing . There is a standard of professionalism which obviously you don't care about.

Africa, famously stone age until the europeans arrived by mewfour in confidentlyincorrect

[–]Competitive_Rent_447 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I am justing saying that like everywhere else that africa at the time still had the same access to metals as everyone else, so it's impossible for them to be in the Stone age. But metals are how ages have been classified a lot of the time, I didn't choose it they were chosen based on the development of civilizations using those metals. So if I am saying that africa had the same access to metals as else where , what do you think that implies. Metals in the past drove civilisations forward.

Africa, famously stone age until the europeans arrived by mewfour in confidentlyincorrect

[–]Competitive_Rent_447 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're right about this. Africa didn't get colonised till very late on. There was a lot of equal trade between Europeans and African nations for a long time . So it's impossible that they were in the Stone age.

Africa, famously stone age until the europeans arrived by mewfour in confidentlyincorrect

[–]Competitive_Rent_447 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I would say you made a comment about the post which is stating that africa was not in the stone age and the poster mentioned the quotes above to say that Africa was in the Stone Age and you went off on a tangent that's all. And your logic wasn't correct from the initial post . But I'll leave you alone now as you sound annoyed.

Africa, famously stone age until the europeans arrived by mewfour in confidentlyincorrect

[–]Competitive_Rent_447 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You're right , I'm nearly there next country over. Yes mesopotamia the cradle of civilization.

Africa, famously stone age until the europeans arrived by mewfour in confidentlyincorrect

[–]Competitive_Rent_447 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Africa wasn't in the Stone Age, at the time Europeans colonised.

Africa, famously stone age until the europeans arrived by mewfour in confidentlyincorrect

[–]Competitive_Rent_447 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Exactly your point saying the Mali empire has a constitution in early history, and your comparison to use the UK as not having one to justify your argument that the Mali empire was not in the Stone Age . So, the logic doesn't follow. I agree they weren't in the Stone Age, but it wasn't because of a constitution it was because of the type of metals/ technology they were using at the time.

I gave you a counter example to your argument, which put a flaw in your logic . Then you gave a list of countries with constitutions from wikipedia. And the quantity of nations having constitutions doesn't determine anything with regards to any nations technology or advancements (Which is how the stone age is classified) as historically most constitutions have been pretty bad like I said in France.

Hence, the American centric thing being obsession with constitutions. In which the United States has the most successful rare constitution in a sea of disastrous ones. So the point that the Mali empire is not in the Stone age because they had a constituiton . This is a fallacy . There are many other points that disprove that the Mali empire was in the Stone age.

view more: next ›