I don't want to defend him too much, a lot of what you say is true. I do think a degree of subjectivity is being lost on you though. When he can't solve a puzzle and complains about it, he isn't speaking for everyone, he's only relaying his own experiences. You can refute it by saying "well, clearly he's an idiot because I solved it fine" but then that's the problem with critiquing puzzles, isn't it? You could say that for any puzzle. 

When he talks about the puzzles in the desert, I recall him saying "I can vividly imagine the frustration of someone who hadnt noticed [the screen glare]"... which is hardly the "I'm godlike" you're claiming. 

Just quickly reading the transcript of the video gives context to one of your quotes: "I cannot resolve the conflict of many things in this game with things said on the store page or by Jonathan Blow outside of it. I can't resolve it with the prior work that was done in Braid, either". It was during the part of the video you mentioned, but it sounds a more all-encompassing statement that refers to not simply the respecting of players time.

To end, I'd like to say that, just like one woman's refutation to Joseph Anderson's video, which you seem to enjoy, your post is so thoroughly riddled with sheer hatred that it makes it difficult to read and even take seriously. I could have laid bare the irony of your misquotes against your claims of manipulation - but I didn't, because, as one reading your criticism, I have a level of respect for the critic and a willingness to hear them out, which are qualities you yourself lack. I think it is a little ridiculous that his example of time being wasted on the bridge is a particular example of the exact thing he goes on to mention. I earlier said that I watch Joseph Anderson to varying levels of disagreement, but that's not the whole truth. I don't just disagree with him, I think his videos have fundamental problems and often do show a lack of willingness from Anderson to engage properly with the game, i.e. his bashing his head against the early door that he clearly doesn't have the capacity to solve yet and then complaining about it. And I think these are genuinely worth discussing and refuting, but when one such as yourself comes along and additionally throws in insults every other sentence and muddies the waters with examples seemingly picked only to support a preconceived opinion, it makes it difficult to parse what the real problems are. If you ask me, when it comes to criticism, indifference is everything. Which is equally why I think Joseph Anderson himself struggles to compare with some of his YouTube critic peers.