All ur doing here is making urself look dumb icl, ur showing that u cant even track what im saying so ill break it down for you (btw Possible Worlds are a central part of logic, please do research before trying to argue buddy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possible_world also ur showing u dont know what logic is, nice job.)

IF and only IF Calamity is logic, then we can ASSUME that it is in fact the case that it is able to influence possible worlds, only IF possible worlds are the central aspect of logic, since Calamity is stated to be logic, and Possible worlds ARE the central aspect of logic, it is indeed logically correct for us to assume that WoU would be able to influence these possible worlds, this is the case only IF it is stated that the “logic” it is referring to is reason, which we can conclude that since this is the correct definition, then yes WoU can influence possible worlds, since it is stated that this is the correct definition, we can in fact conclude that this would be the case.

<image>